Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T02:28:43.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polypropylene Crystallization on Maleated Polypropylene-Treated Wood Surfaces: Effects on Interfacial Adhesion in Wood Polypropylene Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Paul C. Kolosick
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Chemical Engineering Department, Madison, WI
George E. Myers
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI
James A. Koutsky
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Chemical Engineering Department, Madison, WI
Get access

Abstract

Polypropylene (PP)-wood veneer laminates were used as a model system to investigate adhesion in wood-polypropylene composites. Wood veneers were treated with maleated polypropylene waxes (MA-PP). PP films were then compression molded to the wood surfaces and peel forces were measured.

Low MA-PP treatment levels increased the peel adhesion over that for untreated surfaces. High MA-PP treatment levels decreased the peel adhesion and intermediate MA-PP levels had no effect on the peel adhesion. Microscopy of the fracture surfaces indicated PP penetration into lumens in both treated and untreated wood veneer. Untreated surfaces also exhibited PP penetration into pits and intercellular spaces, while treated surfaces exhibited only hindered penetration on this scale. The penetrated PP formed tendrils during fracture. DSC of PP on wood and cellulose surfaces showed higher PP crystallization temperatures on untreated surfaces than on treated surfaces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Han, G.-S., Saka, S. and Shiraishi, N., Mokuzai Gakkaishi 37, 241 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Felix, J.M. and Gatenholm, P., J. of App. Pol. Sci. 42, 609 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Krzysik, A.M. and Youngquist, J.A., Intern. J. of Adhesion and Adhesives. 11 (4), 235 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Myers, G.E., Chahyadi, I.S., Coberly, C.A. and Ermer, D.S., Inter. J. of Pol. Mat. 15, 21 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Olsen, D.J. in ANTEC '91 (Soc. of Plas. Eng., Inc., Tech. Papers 37, Montreal, ON, 1991) pp. 18861891.Google Scholar
6. Kolosick, P.C., Scott, C.T., Koutsky, J.A. and Myers, G.E. in Materials Interactions Relevant to the Pulp, Paper. and Wood Industries, edited by Caulfield, D.F., Passaretti, J.D. and Sobczynski, S.F. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 197, San Francisco, CA 1990) pp. 119124.Google Scholar