Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:08:19.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation of Strontium Titanate Powders by Decomposition of Polymeric Precursors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

S. L. Peschke
Affiliation:
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM
M. Ciftcioglu
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico, Dept. of Chemical and Nuclear Eng., Albuquerque, NM 87131
D. H. Doughty
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
J. A. Voigt
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

The effects of substituting poly(acrylic acid), PAA, and mucic acid for citric acid in the standard Pechini powder synthesis process was studied. Strontium titanate was chosen as the model system for this study. Powders were prepared from precursor solutions in which PAA (average molecular weight = 2,000 and 5000) was substituted for citric acid (up to 70% by weight), and with reduced weight of total organic reagents (50% reduction). The powders prepared with a 30% substitution of PAA for citric acid produced weakly agglomerated submicron particles after calcining. These powders contained a larger fraction of weak agglomerates than the powders prepared by the original Pechini process. As such, the PAA derived powder could be easily fractionated and dispersed with greater than 70% of the calcined powder having particle sizes less than 0.5 μm

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lessing, P. A., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bul., 68 1002–7 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Zeldin, M. et al., Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers, ACS Symp. Series 360, 1988;Google Scholar
Chick, L. A. et al., Mat. Sci. Let., 10 612 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Pechini, M., U. S. Patent 3,330,697, July 11, 1967.Google Scholar
4. Eror, N. G. and Anderson, H. U., in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry II, edited by Brinker, C. J., Clark, D. E. and Ulrich, D. R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 73., Pittsburgh, PA, 1986) pp. 571–7.Google Scholar
5. Tai, Lone-Wen and Lessing, P. A., J. Mater. Res. 7 511519 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Budd, K. D. and Payne, D. A., in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry II, edited by Brinker, C. J., Clark, D. E. and Ulrich, D. R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 32, Pittsburgh, PA, 1984) pp. 239244.Google Scholar
7. Peschke, S. L., Masters Thesis, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 1991.Google Scholar
8. Ciftcioglu, M., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bul., 67 1591–6 (1986).Google Scholar