Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:48:20.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reactions in the System Basalt/Simulated Spent Fuel/Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

D.E. Grandstaff
Affiliation:
DeDartment of Geology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122
G.L. Mckeon
Affiliation:
DeDartment of Geology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122
E.L. Moore
Affiliation:
DeDartment of Geology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122
G.C. Ulmer
Affiliation:
DeDartment of Geology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122
Get access

Abstract

The Grande Ronde Basalts underlying the Hanford Site are being evaluated as a possible site for a high-level nuclear waste repository. Experiments, in which basalt from the Umtanun flow of the Grande Ronde Basalt and basalt with simulated spent fuel were reacted with synthetic Hanford groundwater, were conducted to determine steady state concentrations which can be used in radionuclide release-rate models. Tests were performed at temperatures of 100°, 200°, and 300°C; 30 MPa pressure, and a solution:solid mass ratio of 10:1 for durations up to 7,000 hr. Solution aliquots were extracted periodically during the experiments for analysis. The pH was measured at 250°C and recalculated to higher temperatures. In the basalt-water system the stable high-temperature pH values achieved were 7.2 (100°C), 7.5 (200°C), and 7.6 (300°C). Solution composition variations are due to mesostasis (glass) dissolution and precipitation of secondary phases. Solution measurements indicate a redox potential (Eh) of about -0.7 volts at 300°C. Secondary phases produced include silica, potassium feldspar, iron oxides, clays, scapolite, and zeolites. Tests in the basalt + simulated spent fuel + water systen show that calculated pH values stabilized near 7.6 (100°C), 7.2 (200°C), and 7.7 (300°C). At higher temperatures, solution concentrations were controlled by secondary phases similar to those found in basalt-water tests. Less than 1% of uranium, thorium, samarium, rhenium, cerium, and palladium were released to solution while somewhat higher amounts of iodine, molybdenum, and cesium were released. The UO2 component was unreactive; however, other components (e.g., cesium-bearing phases) were almost completely dissolved. Secondary phases incorporating radionuclide-analog elements include clays, palladium sulfide, powellite, coffinite, and a potassium-uranium silicate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Apted, M.J., Overview of Hydrothermal Testing of Waste Package Barrier Materials by the Basalt Waste Isolation Project, RHO-BW-SA-228, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1982).Google Scholar
2. Apted, M.J. and Myers, J., Comparison of the Hydrothermal Stability of Simulated Spent Fuel and Borosilicate Glass in a Basaltic Environment, RHO-BW-ST-38, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1982).Google Scholar
3. Myers, J., Apted, M.J., and Mazer, J.J., Hydrothermal Reaction of Simulated Waste Forms with Barrier Materials Under Conditions Expected in a Nuclear Waste Repository in Basalt, SD-BWI-TI-141, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1983).Google Scholar
4. Dickson, F.W., Blount, C.W., and Tunnell, G., Am. Jour. Sci. 26 (1), 6178 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Seyfried, W.E., Gordon, P., and Dickson, F.W., Am. Mineral 64, 646649 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Woodley, R.E., Wilson, C.N., and Hervig, R.L., The Chemical and Physical Characteristics of Spent Light Water Reactor Fuel and a Method for Simulation of a Non-radioactive Analog, RHO-BWI-C-114, Rockwell Hanford Opertions, Richland, WA (1981).Google Scholar
7. Long, P.E., “Stratigraphy of the Grande Ronde Basalt,” in Myers, , Price, C.W., , S.M., eds., Subsurface Geology of the Cold Creek Syncline, RHO-BWI-ST-14, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1981).Google Scholar
8. Smith, M.J., BWIP Data Package for Reference Chemistry of and Procedures for Preparation of Synthetic Grande Ronde Basalt and Mabton Interbed Groundwaters, RSD-BWI-DP-007, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1981).Google Scholar
9. Moore, E.L., Hydrothermal Interactions of Columbia River Basalt and its Coexisting Groundwater, unpublished M. A. Thesis, Temple University (1983).Google Scholar
10. Reed, M.H., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 46, 513528 (1982).10.1016/0016-7037(82)90155-7Google Scholar
11. Arnorsson, E., Gunnlaugsson, E., and Svavarsson, H., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 47, 547566 (1983).10.1016/0016-7037(83)90277-6Google Scholar