Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:17:56.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Gas Phase Decomposition in the ALE Growth of III–V Compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

K. G. Reid
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Raleigh, NC
H. M. Urdianyk
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Raleigh, NC
N. A. El-Masry
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Raleigh, NC
S. M. Bedair
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Raleigh, NC
Get access

Abstract

The effects of the growth temperature and exposure time to TMGa for ALE of gallium arsenide was studied using TMGa and AsH3 in a modified, vertical, atmospheric, MOCVD reactor with a rotating susceptor. It was found that the temperature range for ALE growth could -be extended from 450°C to 700°C by adjustment of the exposure time to TMGa. The maximum exposure time to TMGa was found to decrease as growth temperature increased with high temperature growth limited to exposures of only fractions of a second. Beyond a critical exposure time to TMGa, gallium droplets form on the surface. It is known that premature decomposition of TMGa in the heated gaseous boundary layer causes the formation of the gallium droplets and the consequent loss of ALE growth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mochizuki, K., Ozeki, M., Kodama, K., and Ohtsuka, N., J. Cryst. Growth 29,557 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Ozeki, M., Mochizuki, K., Ohtsuka, N., and Kodama, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1509 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Bedair, S.M., Tischler, M.A., Katsuyama, T., and El-Masry, N.A., Appl. Phys.Lett. 47, 51 (1985).Google Scholar
4. de Croon, M.H.J.M. and Giling, L.J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 2867 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Kodama, K., Ozeki, M., Mochizuki, K., and Ohtsuka, N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 656 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Colas, E., Bhat, R., Skromme, B.J., and Nihous, G.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 2769 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Katsuyama, T. and Bedair, S.M., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 5098 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Ming Yu, L., Ulrich Memmert, and Thomas Kuech, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 1011 (1989).Google Scholar