Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:29:39.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selected Area Growth of GaAs by Laser Induced Pyrolysis of Adsorbed Ga-Alkyls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

V. M. Donnelly
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Ave., Murray Hill NJ, 07974; current address: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla CA, 92093
J. A. McCaulley
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Ave., Murray Hill NJ, 07974; current address: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla CA, 92093
V. R. McCrary
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Ave., Murray Hill NJ, 07974; current address: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla CA, 92093
C. W. Tu
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Ave., Murray Hill NJ, 07974; current address: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla CA, 92093
Get access

Abstract

We compare three approaches to excimer laser assisted growth of GaAs: 1) Film growth is dominated by gas phase photolysis of deposition precursor gases at 193 nm under low pressure metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) conditions. This approach leads to rapid deposition at low substrate temperature, but with very low spatial resolution (∼1 cm). 2) Growth is controlled by laser induced pyrolysis of adsorbed triethylgallium (TEGa) at 193 nm under metal organic molecular beam epitaxy (MOMBE) conditions. Films grown under these conditions have the potential for high spatial resolution (i.e. submicron), but geometric constraints in MBE conflict with the requirement of a short working distance between the lens and substrate, making it difficult to attain this limit. 3) Areaselective growth is controlled by laser induced pyrolysis of adsorbed TEGa at 351 nm (XeF excimer laser) under low pressure MOCVD conditions. This approach combines the advantage of laser controlled surface chemistry with the potential for much shorter working distances.

Selected area growth of GaAs occurs in this latter mode because TEGa dissociatively chemisorbs at 400°C to form a stable layer which decomposes further under laser irradiation to liberate hydrocarbon products. The Ga left behind on the surface reacts with As2 and As4 (formed by pyrolysis of trimethlyarsine or triethylarsine in a side tube) to grow GaAs in irradiated areas. Since the gas does not absorb at 351 nm the process is highly areaselective. Patterned films with feature sizes of ∼70µm (limited by the mask dimensions) were grown by this method. Interference between the incident beam and light scattered along the surface also causes a substructure of parallel lines to form on the features with a line spacing about equal to the laser wavelength 0.35µm. This indicates that the ultimate spatial resolution is comparable to that predicted by thermal diffusion calculations (∼0.3µm).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Donnelly, V. M., Geva, M., Long, J., and Karlicek, R. F., Appl. Phys. Lett., 44, 951 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Donnelly, V. M., Brasen, D., Appelbaum, A., and Geva, M., J. Appl. Phys., 58, 2022 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Donnelly, V. M., McCrary, V. R., Appelbaum, A., Brasen, D., and Lowe, W. P., J. Appl. Phys., 61, 1410 (1987).Google Scholar
4. McCrary, V. R., Donnelly, V. M., Brasen, D., Appelbaum, A., and Farrow, R. C., in Photon, Beam, and Plasma Stimulated Chemical Processes at Surfaces, ed. Donnelly, V. M., Herman, I. P., and Hirose, M., Vol. 75, (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh PA, 1987), pp. 223231.Google Scholar
5. Balk, P., Heinecke, H., Plass, C., Pütz, N., and Lüth, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A4, 711 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Haigh, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A4, 1456 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Nishizawa, J., Abe, H., Kurabayashi, T., and Sakurai, N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A4, 706 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Doi, A., Aoyagi, Y., and Namba, S., in Photon, Beam, and Plasma Stimulated Chemical Processes at Surfaces, ed. Donnelly, V. M., Herman, I. P., and Hirose, M., Vol. 75, (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh PA, 1987), pp. 217222.Google Scholar
9. Karam, N. H., Bedair, S. M., El-Masry, N. A., and Griffis, D., in Photon, Beam, and Plasma Stimulated Chemical Processes at Surfaces, ed. Donnelly, V. M., Herman, I. P., and Hirose, M., Vol. 75, (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh PA, 1987), pp. 241248.Google Scholar
10. Irvine, S. J. C., Mullin, J. B., Tunnicliffe, J., J. Crystal Growth, 68, 188 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Karlicek, R. F., Long, J., and Donnelly, V. M., J. Crystal Growth 68, 123 (1984).Google Scholar
12. McCrary, V. R. and Donnelly, V. M., J. Crystal Growth, 84, 253 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Donnelly, V. M., Tu, C. W., Beggy, J. C., McCrary, V. R., Lamont, M. G., Harris, T. D., Baiocchi, F. A., and Farrow, R. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 1065 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. McCaulley, J. A., McCrary, V. R., and Donnelly, V. M., J. Phys. Chem., in press (1988).Google Scholar
15. Ehrlich, D. J. and Osgood, R. M. Jr., Chem. Phys. Lett. 79, 381 (1981).Google Scholar
16. McCaulley, J. A., McCrary, V. R., and Donnelly, V. M., this volume.Google Scholar
17. Metals Handbook Ninth Edition, Volume 2 Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Pure Metals, (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1979), p. 801.Google Scholar
18. Donnelly, V. M. and McCaulley, J. A., unpublished data.Google Scholar
19. Robertson, A. Jr., Chiu, T. H., Tsang, W. T., and Cunningham, J. E., unpublished data.Google Scholar
20. Baeri, P. and Campisano, P., in Laser Annealing of Semiconductors, eds. Poate, J. M. and Mayer, J. M (Academic Press, New York 1982), pp. 75109.Google Scholar
21. Blakemore, J. S., J. Appl. Phys. 53, R123 (1982).Google Scholar
22. Amith, A., Kudman, I., and Steigmeier, E. F., Phys. Rev. 138, A1270 (1965).Google Scholar