Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:36:10.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simulation of Particle Synthesis by Premixed Laminar Stagnation Flames

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2013

Abhijit Modak
Affiliation:
Reaction Design, 5930 Cornerstone court west, Suite 230, San Diego, CA 92121, U.S.A.
Karthik Puduppakkam
Affiliation:
Reaction Design, 5930 Cornerstone court west, Suite 230, San Diego, CA 92121, U.S.A.
Chitralkumar Naik
Affiliation:
Reaction Design, 5930 Cornerstone court west, Suite 230, San Diego, CA 92121, U.S.A.
Ellen Meeks
Affiliation:
Reaction Design, 5930 Cornerstone court west, Suite 230, San Diego, CA 92121, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

A sectional method for determining particle size distributions has been implemented within the particle tracking module included with CHEMKIN-PRO. The module is available for use with many types of reactor models, ranging from 0-D batch reactors to laminar flame simulations. Coupled with the Burner-stabilized Stagnation Flame (BSSF) Model, the sectional model offers a high-fidelity, robust, and efficient computational framework for simulating flame synthesis of particles in a laminar, premixed stagnation flame environment. The CHEMKIN-PRO coupling allows inclusion of detailed gas-phase chemistry that determines key particle-formation precursors, along with physical processes such as nucleation and coagulation of particles. These capabilities are demonstrated for two flame-particle systems of practical importance, viz. nanocrystalline titania synthesis and soot formation. The results are compared with experimental data obtained at the University of Southern California (USC) flame facility. Computed particle size distributions show good agreement with experimental data. Simulations have led to exploration of the parameter space for particle production and particle-size influences.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kammler, H. K., Madler, L., and Pratsinis, S., Chem Eng and Tech 24 (6), 583596 (2001).3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abid, A. D., Camacho, J., Sheen, D. A., and Wang, H, Combustion and Flame 156 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reaction Design, CHEMKIN-PRO 2012, San Diego, USA.Google Scholar
Fox, M.A., Dulay, M.T., Chem. Rev., 93 (1) 341357 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratzel, M., Nature 414, 338344 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Znaidi, L., Seraphimova, R., Bocquet, J. F., Colbeau-Justin, C., Pommier, C., Mater. Res. Bull. 36, 811825 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolmachoff, E. D., Abid, A. D., Phares, D. J., Campbell, C. S., Wang, H., Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 32 18391845 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikraz, S., Phares, D. J., and Wang, H., The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 116, 53425351 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Sharab, Jafar F., Halim, Hadi, Ahmed, Saquib, Asefa, Tewodros, Birnie, Dunbar P. III, Tse, Stephen D., Kear, Bernard H., Microsc. Microanal. 17 (Suppl 2), 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S. and Ramkrishna, D., Chem. Eng Science 52(24), 46594679 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reaction Design, Reaction Workbench 2012, San Diego, USA Google Scholar
Tsantilis, S., Kammler, H. K., Pratsinis, S. E., Chem. Eng Science 57, 21392156 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar