Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:53:27.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spectroscopic Ellipsometry of Ta2O5 ON Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C.A. Richter
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Electronics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8122
N.V. Nguyen
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Electronics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8122
G.B. Alers
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, Inc., Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, we present the results of spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) studies of Ta2O5 films on Si. Based on these results, we have experimentally determined an effective method for analyzing SE measurements of Ta2O5. A set of CVD-grown Ta2O5 films on silicon – with thicknesses ranging from below 10 nm to approximately 60 nm thick – was investigated by SE in an effort to improve optical film thickness metrology for Ta2O5. The samples were measured across the spectral range 1.5 eV to 6.0 eV by using a well-characterized, high-accuracy rotating-analyzer-type ellipsometer. We present an analysis method, based upon a Tauc-Lorentz parameterization of the optical properties of Ta2O5, that properly describes the SE data. We also demonstrate how optical properties are affected by the presence of an interlayer at the Si/Ta2O5 interface. Our results show small, but meaningful variations in optical parameters resulting from variations in deposition processes and annealing conditions. This work demonstrates that SE can be used successfully to characterize this category of alternate gate dielectrics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Alers, G.B. et al. , Appl. Phys. Letters 73, 1517 (1998).10.1063/1.122191Google Scholar
2 Grahn, J.V. et al. , J. Appl. Phys. 84, 1632 (1998).10.1063/1.368256Google Scholar
3 Chaneliere, C. et al. , J. Appl. Phys 83, 4823 (1998).10.1063/1.367277Google Scholar
4 Nguyen, N.V., Chandler-Horowitz, D., Pellegrino, J.G., and Amirtharaj, P.M., in Semiconductor Characterization: Present Status and Future Needs, Bullis, W.M., Seiler, D.G., and Diebold, A.C., Editors (AIP Press, Woodbury, NY, 1996) pp. 438442.Google Scholar
5 Azzam, R.M.A. and Bashara, N.M, Ellipsometry and Polarized Light (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986).Google Scholar
6 The random uncertainty of Δ and Ψ is a function of photon energy. For the bulk of the spectrum, the standard deviation is less than 0.010 degrees and rises to approximately 0.100 degrees at the low-energy and high-energy limits. Note that the symbols representing the data in the figures are significantly larger than this uncertainty.Google Scholar
7 Jellison, G.E. Jr., and Modine, F.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 371 (1996).10.1063/1.118064Google Scholar
8 Yasuda, J. and Aspnes, D.E., Appl. Optics, 33, 7435 (1994).10.1364/AO.33.007435Google Scholar
9 Malitson, H.J., Opt. Soc. Am., 55, 1205 (1965).10.1364/JOSA.55.001205Google Scholar
10 Cox, P.A., Transition Metal Oxides : An Introduction to Their Electronic Structure and Properties (Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
11 Alers, G.B., presented at Symposium on Ultrathin SiO2 and High-K Materials for ULSI Gate Dielectrics, The Meeting of the Materials Research Society, Spring 1999.Google Scholar
12 Garfunkel, E., presented at the 29th IEEE Semiconductor Interface Specialist Conference (1998).Google Scholar
13 Atomic force microscopy measurements were done on the two thinnest films (S1 and S2). Both of these films (including S2, annealed at 800°C) were found to be remarkably smooth with no signs of either pinholes or roughness.Google Scholar
14 Jarrendahl, K., and Arwin, H., Thin Solid Films, 313–314, 114 (1998).10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00781-5Google Scholar