Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:41:50.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Substitutional Effects on the Thermoelectric Properties of Transition Metal Pentatellurides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. T. Littleton
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Department
J. W. Kolis
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Department Department of Chemistry
C. R. Feger
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry
Terry M. Tritt
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Department Department of Physics and Astronomy Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
Get access

Abstract

The thermoelectric properties (resistivity and thermopower) of single crystals of the low-dimensional pentatelluride materials, Hffe5 and ZrTe5, have been measured as a function of temperature from 10K < T < 320K. Both parent materials exhibit a resistive transition peak, Tp ≈ 80K for HfTe5 and Tp ≈ 145K for ZrTe5. Each display a large positive (p-type) thermopower (α ≥ +125μV/K) around room temperature, which undergoes a change to a large negative (n-type) thermopower (α≤-125μV/K) below the peak temperature. The magnitude of this resistive anomaly is typically 3–7 times the room temperature value of ≈ 1 mΩ•cm. Through isoelectronic substitution of Zr for Hf (Hf1-xZrxTe5), a systematic shift is observed in Tp as the Zr concentration increases. Small Ti substitution for Hf and Zr affects the electronic properties strongly, producing a substantial reduction in Tp for either parent compound. However, the large values of thermopower and the magnitude of the resistive peak remain essentially unchanged. Substitutions of Se or Sb on the Te sites greatly affects the electronic behavior of the parent materials. Se doping increases the thermopower values by ≈20% while decreasing the resistivity by as much as 25%. These effects double the power factor, α2σT, of the parent materials. Small Sb substitutions appear to completely suppress the resistive anomaly. These features in the resistivity and thermopower signal a large degree of tunability in the temperature range of operation. The potential of these materials as candidates for low temperature thermoelectric applications will be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Goldsmid, H. J., Electronic Refrigeration, Pion Limited Publishing, London, (1986).Google Scholar
2. CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics, edited by Rowe, D.M., CRC Press, Boca Raton (1995).Google Scholar
3. Wood, C. W., Rep. Prog. Phys. 51, 459539 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Mahan, G., Brian Sales and Jeff Sharp, Physics Today, March 1997.Google Scholar
5. Allen, Andrew W., Detector Handbook, Laser FocusWorld, March issue 1997 Google Scholar
6. Sloan, J., Superconductor Industry, Fall 1996, p30 (1996)Google Scholar
7. Tritt, Terry M., Science, 272, 1276 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hicks, L. D. and Dresselhaus, M. S., Phys. Rev. B., 47, 12727 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Fleuriel, J. P., Calliet, T. and Borshchevsky, A., Proc. of the XIII International Conference on Thermoelectrics, AIP, p 4044 (1995)Google Scholar
10. Sales, B. C., Mandrus, D. and Williams, R. K., Science, 272, 1325 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Morelli, D. T. et. al., Phys. Rev. B, 51, 9622 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Slack, Glen A. and Toukala, V. G., Jour. Appl. Phys., 76, 1635 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Nolas, G., Slack, G., Morelli, D. T., Tritt, T. M. and Ehrlich, A.C., Jour. Appl. Phys., 79, 4002(1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Tritt, T. M. et. al., Jour. Appl. Phys., 79, 8412 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Nolas, G., Slack, G., Harris, V. G. and Tritt, T. M., Jour. Appl. Phys., 80, 6304 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Jones, T. E. et. al., Solid St. Comm., 42, 793 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. DiSalvo, F. J., Fleming, R. M. and Waszczak, J. V., Phys. Rev. B., 24, 2935 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Fuller, W. W. et. al., Journal de Physique, C3, 1709 (1983)Google Scholar
19. Isumi, M., et. al., Solid State Comm., 42, 773 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Bullett, D. W., Solid State Comm., 42, 691 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Kamm, G. N. et. al., Phys. Rev. B., 35, 1223 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Kamm, G. N. et. al., Phys. Rev. B., 31, 7617 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Stillwell, E. P., Ehrlich, A. C., Kamm, G. N. and Gillespie, D. J., Phys. Rev. B., 39, 1626 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Levy, F. and Berger, H., J. Cryst. Growth, 61, 61 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Brattas, L. and Kjekshus, A., Acta Chem. Scand., 27, 2367 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Tritt, T. M. et. al., M.R.S. Proc., Thermoelectric Materials: New Directions and Approaches, Spring 97, edited by Tritt, T. M. et. al., 478, 249–54 (1997)Google Scholar
27. IVLittleton, R. T., Wilson, M.L., Feger, C. R., Marone, M. J., Kolis, J., and Tritt, T. M., Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on Thermoelectrics, ed. by Heinrich, A. (1997)Google Scholar
28. IVLittleton, R. T., Tritt, T. M., Feger, C. R., Kolis, J., Wilson, M. L., Marone, M., Payne, J., Verebeli, D., and Levy, F., Appl. Phys. L., 72, 2056–8 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Yim, W. M. and Rosi, F. D., Solid-State Electronics, 15, 1121–40, (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Yim, W. M. and Rosi, F. D., Solid-State Electronics, 15, 1141–65, (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar