Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:43:05.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Reaction Mechanisms Governing the Selective Area Growth of III-V Compound Semiconductors by Chemical Beam Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

G J Davies
Affiliation:
BT Laboratories, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich, IP5 7RE, UK.
P J Skevington
Affiliation:
BT Laboratories, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich, IP5 7RE, UK.
C L Levoguer
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Physical Chemistry Laboratory, South Parks Rd, Oxford, 0X1 3QZ, UK.
C L French
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Physical Chemistry Laboratory, South Parks Rd, Oxford, 0X1 3QZ, UK.
J S Foord
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Physical Chemistry Laboratory, South Parks Rd, Oxford, 0X1 3QZ, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Previous studies have helped elucidate the underlying mechanisms for selective area epitaxy in chemical beam epitaxy by investigating the reactions of triethylgallium (TEG) on a silicon nitride surface. However no explanation was produced as to why selective growth is lost at low temperatures or high Gp V beam fluxes. This question is addressed in this paper which examines the interaction between TEG and As2 on the silicon nitridesurface. In the absence of arsenic, TEG adsorbs with a low sticking probability on the dielectric. Adsorbed species mainly desorb rather than decompose, and any Ga produced on the surface becomes converted to a nitride form; no free Ga is produced hence GaAs growth cannot occur. Arsenic is found to form a weakly adsorbed phase on the nitride surface. Reaction with co-adsorbed TEG results in the formation of GaAs. Adsorbed As also is efficient in increasing the reactive sticking probability of TEG.The results provide further insight into the reaction mechanisms governing selected area epitaxy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1] For a recent review see Tsang, W T in J Cryst Growth, 107, (1991), 960.Google Scholar
2] Vodjani, N., Lemarchand, A. and Paradan, H., J. Phys.(Paris), C5, (1982), 339.Google Scholar
3] Tokumitsu, E., Kudou, Y., Konagai, M. and Takahasi, K., J. Appl. Phys., 55, (1984), 3163.Google Scholar
4] Andrews, D. A., Rejman-Grene, M. A. Z., Wakefield, B. and Davies, G. J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 53, (1988), 97.Google Scholar
5] Andrews, D. A., Rejman-Greene, M. A. Z., Wakefield, B. and Davies, G. J., J. Cryst. Growth, 95, (1989), 167.Google Scholar
6] Davies, G. J., Skevington, P. J., Duncan, W. J., French, C. L. and Foord, J. S., Materials Science and Engineering, B9, (1991), 93.Google Scholar
7] Davies, G. J., Skevington, P. J., French, C. L. and Foord, J. S., J. Cryst. Growth, 120, (1992), 369.Google Scholar
8] Heinecke, H., Brauers, A., Grafahrend, F., Plass, C., Putz, N., Werner, K., Weyers, M., Luth, H. and Balk, P.. J. Cryst. Growth, 77, (1986), 303.Google Scholar
9] Foxon, C. T. and Joyce, B. A., Surface Sci., 50, (1975), 434.Google Scholar
10] Briggs, Eds D. and Seah, M. P., Practical Surface Analysis by X-ray Photoelectron and Auger Spectroscopy, Wiley, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
11] JS Foord and ATS Wee, in preparationGoogle Scholar