Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-6tv95 Total loading time: 0.394 Render date: 2021-05-14T05:22:55.124Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

INDIA IN THE COMING ‘CLIMATE G2’?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2020

Jonathan Camuzeaux
Affiliation:
Environmental Defense Fund. E-mail: jcamuzeaux@edf.org.
Thomas Sterner
Affiliation:
University of Gothenburg. E-mail: Thomas.Sterner@economics.gu.se.
Gernot Wagner
Affiliation:
New York University, Department of Environmental Studies and NYU Wagner School of Public Service.

Abstract

China and the United States are the two largest emitters of greenhouse gases, making them pivotal players in global climate negotiations. Within the coming decade, however, India is set to become the most important counterpart to the United States, as it overtakes China as the country with the most at stake depending on the type of global burden-sharing agreements reached, thus becoming a member of the ‘Climate G2’. We create a hypothetical global carbon market based on modelling emissions reduction commitments across countries and regions relative to their marginal abatement costs. We then analyse net financial flows across a wide range of burden-sharing agreements, from pure ‘grandfathering’ based on current emissions to equal-per-capita allocation. Among the four largest players – the United States, the EU-27, China, and India – it is China that would currently be the largest net seller of emissions allowances in all but the grandfathered scenario. The United States would be the largest net buyer. However, India is poised to take China’s position by around 2030. That leaves the United States and India as the two major countries with most to gain and lose, depending on the type of climate deal reached.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© National Institute of Economic and Social Research, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

For a less technical exploration of aspects of this argument, see Ahuja et al. (2015). We thank Richie Ahuja, Shoibal Chakravarty, Frank Convery, Geoffrey Heal, Nathaniel Keohane, and Johannes Urpelainen for helpful comments and discussions. We thank Dominic Watson for research assistance. Thomas Sterner thanks Mistra Carbon Exit for funding. All remaining errors are our own.

References

Ahuja, R., Camuzeaux, J., Sterner, T., Wagner, G., Ahuja, R., Camuzeaux, J., Sterner, T., Wagner, G. (2015), From Copenhagen to Paris, Foreign Aff.Google Scholar
Barro, R.J. (1998), Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsall, N. and Subramanian, A. (2009), ‘Energy needs and efficiency, not emissions: re-framing the climate change narrative’, SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1515990, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretschger, L. (2013), ‘Climate policy and equity principles: fair burden sharing in a dynamic world’, Environ. Dev. Econ, 18, pp, 517–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X13000284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretschger, L. and Mollet, J.C. (2015), ‘Prices vs. equity in international climate policy: a broad perspective’, SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2561326, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravarty, S., Chikkatur, A., Coninck, H., de, Pacala, S., Socolow, R. and Tavoni, M. (2009), ‘Sharing global CO2 emission reductions among one billion high emitters’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 106, pp. 11884–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905232106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Krey, V., Richels, R., Rose, S. and Tavoni, M. (2009), ‘International climate policy architectures: overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios’, Energy Econ., International, U.S. and E.U. Climate Change Control Scenarios: Results from EMF 22 31, Supplement 2, S64–S81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.10.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Elzen, M.G.J., Höhne, N., Brouns, B., Winkler, H. and Ott, H.E. (2007), ‘Differentiation of countries’ future commitments in a post-2012 climate regime: an assessment of the “South-North Dialogue” proposal’, Environ. Sci. Policy, 10, pp. 185203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Elzen, M.G.J., Lucas, P.L. and van Vuuren, D.P. (2008), ‘Regional abatement action and costs under allocation schemes for emission allowances for achieving low CO2 -equivalent concentrations’, Clim. Change, 90, pp. 243–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9466-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubash, N.K. (2013), ‘The politics of climate change in India: narratives of equity and cobenefits’, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 4, pp. 191201. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enerdata (2016), ‘POLES: Prospective Outlook on Long-term Energy Systems’ [WWW Document], https://www.enerdata.net/solutions/poles-model.html (accessed 4.12.17).Google Scholar
Foot, R. and Walter, A. (2010), China, the United States, and Global Order, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavard, C., Winchester, N., Jacoby, H. and Paltsev, S. (2011), ‘What to expect from sectoral trading: a US-China example’, Climate Change Economics, 02, pp. 926. https://doi.org/10.1142/S201000781100019X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J.F., Sterner, T. and Wagner, G. (2014), ‘A balance of bottom-up and top-down in linking climate policies’, Nature Climate Change, 4, pp. 1064–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstone, M. (2014), ‘The next big climate question: will India follow China?’, New York Times.Google Scholar
Grubb, M., Sha, F., Spencer, T., Hughes, N., Zhang, Z. and Agnolucci, P. (2015), ‘A review of Chinese CO2 emission projections to 2030: the role of economic structure and policy’, Climate Policy, 15, S7–S39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1101307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höhne, N., den Elzen, M. and Escalante, D. (2014), ‘Regional GHG reduction targets based on effort sharing: a comparison of studies’, Climate Policy, 14, pp. 122–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.849452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Energy Agency (2014), World Energy Outlook.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (2015), World Economic Outlook Special Report: Energy and Climate Change.Google Scholar
Jacoby, H.D., Babiker, M.M., Paltsev, S. and Reilly, J.M. (2008), ‘Sharing the burden of GHG reductions’, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change.Google Scholar
Johansson, D.J.A., Lucas, P.L., Weitzel, M., Ahlgren, E.O., Bazaz, A.B., Chen, W., den Elzen, M.G.J., Ghosh, J., Grahn, M., Liang, Q.-M., Peterson, S., Pradhan, B.K., van Ruijven, B.J., Shukla, P.R., van Vuuren, D.P. and Wei, Y.-M. (2015), ‘Multi-model comparison of the economic and energy implications for China and India in an international climate regime’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20, pp. 1335–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9549-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, N., Petsonk, A. and Hanafi, A. (2015), ‘Toward a club of carbon markets’, Climate Change, 115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1506-z.Google Scholar
Mandhana, N. (2014), ‘U.S.-China climate deal puts India in spotlight’, Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (2015a), ‘Climate clubs: overcoming free-riding in international climate policy’, American Economic Review, 105, pp. 1339–70. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.15000001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (2015b), A New Solution: The Climate Club, N. Y. Rev. Books.Google Scholar
OECD (2014), Long-term baseline projections, No. 95 (Edition 2014). Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
Paltsev, S., Morris, J., Cai, Y., Karplus, V. and Jacoby, H. (2012), ‘The role of China in mitigating climate change’, Energy Econ., The Asia Modeling Exercise: Exploring the Role of Asia in Mitigating Climate Change, 34, Supplement 3, S444S450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.04.007Google Scholar
Rastogi, N.P. (2011), ‘Winds of change: India’s emerging climate strategy’, Int. Spect, 46, pp. 127–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2011.576179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, A., Stevens, B., Edmonds, J. and Wise, M. (1998), ‘International equity and differentiation in global warming policy’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 12, pp. 2551. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008262407777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsinghua, PBCSF, ClimateWorks Foundation, Vivid Economics, (2019), ‘Decarbonizing the belt and road initiative: a green finance roadmap’ [WWW Document]. URL https://www.vivideconomics.com/casestudy/decarbonizing-the-belt-and-road-initiative-a-green-finance-roadmap/ (accessed 12.10.19).Google Scholar
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2016), International Energy Outlook.Google Scholar
Volcovici, V. and Wilkes, T. (2014), ‘After U.S.-China climate deal, focus on India to follow suit’, Reuters.Google Scholar
Wagner, G., Kåberger, T., Olai, S., Oppenheimer, M., Rittenhouse, K. and Sterner, T. (2015), ‘Energy policy: push renewables to spur carbon pricing’, Nature, 525, pp. 27–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/525027a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weitzman, M.L. (2016), ‘Voting on prices vs. voting on quantities in a world climate assembly’, Research in Economics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2016.10.004.Google Scholar
White House, (2014), ‘U.S.-China Joint Announcement on Climate Change’ [WWW Document], whitehouse.gov. URL https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/11/us-china-joint-announcement-climate-change (accessed 4.12.17).Google Scholar
White House (2015), ‘U.S.-China Joint Presidential Statement on Climate Change’ [WWW Document], whitehouse.gov. URL https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/25/us-china-joint-presidential-statement-climate-change (accessed 4.12.17).Google Scholar
Winkler, H., Jayaraman, T., Pan, J., de Oliveira, A.S., Zhang, Y., Sant, G., Miguez, J.D.G., Letete, T., Marquard, A. and Raubenheimer, S. (2011), ‘Equitable access to sustainable development’, Contributions to the Body of Scientific Knowledge Paper, Experts BASIC Countries, BASIC Expert Group Beijing Bras. Cape Town Mumbai.Google Scholar
World Bank (2016), ‘Population Estimates and Projections’ [WWW Document]. URL http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/population-projection-tables (accessed 4.12.17).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Camuzeaux et al. Supplementary Materials

Camuzeaux et al. Supplementary Materials 1

Download Camuzeaux et al. Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 119 KB

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

INDIA IN THE COMING ‘CLIMATE G2’?
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

INDIA IN THE COMING ‘CLIMATE G2’?
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

INDIA IN THE COMING ‘CLIMATE G2’?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *