Chesney, Thomas 2017. The Cascade Capacity Predicts Individuals to Seed for Diffusion Through Social Networks. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 34, Issue. 1, p. 51.
BROT, HILLA MUCHNIK, LEV GOLDENBERG, JACOB and LOUZOUN, YORAM 2016. Evolution through bursts: Network structure develops through localized bursts in time and space. Network Science, Vol. 4, Issue. 03, p. 293.
Grewal, Dhruv Bart, Yakov Spann, Martin and Zubcsek, Peter Pal 2016. Mobile Advertising: A Framework and Research Agenda. Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 34, p. 3.
Jiang, Zhengrui Scheibe, Kevin P. Nilakanta, Sree and Qu, Xinxue Shawn 2016. The Economics of Public Beta Testing*. Decision Sciences,
Lobel, Ilan Sadler, Evan and Varshney, Lav R. 2016. Customer Referral Incentives and Social Media. Management Science,
Nejad, Mohammad G. Amini, Mehdi and Sherrell, Daniel L. 2016. The profit impact of revenue heterogeneity and assortativity in the presence of negative word-of-mouth. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 33, Issue. 3, p. 656.
Omodei, Elisa and Arenas, Alex 2016. Untangling the role of diverse social dimensions in the diffusion of microfinance. Applied Network Science, Vol. 1, Issue. 1,
Elwert, Felix 2015. Public health: real-world network targeting of interventions. The Lancet, Vol. 386, Issue. 9989, p. 112.
Herrera, Mauricio Armelini, Guillermo Salvaj, Erica and Braunstein, Lidia Adriana 2015. Understanding Social Contagion in Adoption Processes Using Dynamic Social Networks. PLOS ONE, Vol. 10, Issue. 10, p. e0140891.
Iyengar, Raghuram Van den Bulte, Christophe and Lee, Jae Young 2015. Social Contagion in New Product Trial and Repeat. Marketing Science, Vol. 34, Issue. 3, p. 408.
Kim, David A Hwong, Alison R Stafford, Derek Hughes, D Alex O'Malley, A James Fowler, James H and Christakis, Nicholas A 2015. Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, Vol. 386, Issue. 9989, p. 145.
Nejad, Mohammad G. Amini, Mehdi and Babakus, Emin 2015. Success Factors in Product Seeding: The Role of Homophily. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 91, Issue. 1, p. 68.
Aral, Sinan and Walker, Dylan 2014. Tie Strength, Embeddedness, and Social Influence: A Large-Scale Networked Experiment. Management Science, Vol. 60, Issue. 6, p. 1352.
Bhargava, Hemant K. 2014. Platform technologies and network goods: insights on product launch and management. Information Technology and Management, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 199.
Mochalova, Anastasia and Nanopoulos, Alexandros 2014. A targeted approach to viral marketing. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 13, Issue. 4, p. 283.
Pei, Sen Muchnik, Lev Andrade, Jr., José S. Zheng, Zhiming and Makse, Hernán A. 2014. Searching for superspreaders of information in real-world social media. Scientific Reports, Vol. 4,
Walker, Dylan and Muchnik, Lev 2014. Design of Randomized Experiments in Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 102, Issue. 12, p. 1940.
We use data on a real, large-scale social network of 27 million individuals interacting daily, together with the day-by-day adoption of a new mobile service product, to inform, build, and analyze data-driven simulations of the effectiveness of seeding (network targeting) strategies under different social conditions. Three main results emerge from our simulations. First, failure to consider homophily creates significant overestimation of the effectiveness of seeding strategies, casting doubt on conclusions drawn by simulation studies that do not model homophily. Second, seeding is constrained by the small fraction of potential influencers that exist in the network. We find that seeding more than 0.2% of the population is wasteful because the gain from their adoption is lower than the gain from their natural adoption (without seeding). Third, seeding is more effective in the presence of greater social influence. Stronger peer influence creates a greater than additive effect when combined with seeding. Our findings call into question some conventional wisdom about these strategies and suggest that their overall effectiveness may be overestimated.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
Abstract views reflect the number of visits to the article landing page.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.