Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Selection and influence in cultural dynamics*

  • DAVID KEMPE (a1), JON KLEINBERG (a2), SIGAL OREN (a3) and ALEKSANDRS SLIVKINS (a4)
Abstract
Abstract

One of the fundamental principles driving diversity or homogeneity in domains such as cultural differentiation, political affiliation, and product adoption is the tension between two forces: influence (the tendency of people to become similar to others they interact with) and selection (the tendency to be affected most by the behavior of others who are already similar). Influence tends to promote homogeneity within a society, while selection frequently causes fragmentation. When both forces act simultaneously, it becomes an interesting question to analyze which societal outcomes should be expected.

To study this issue more formally, we analyze a natural stylized model built upon active lines of work in political opinion formation, cultural diversity, and language evolution. We assume that the population is partitioned into “types” according to some traits (such as language spoken or political affiliation). While all types of people interact with one another, only people with sufficiently similar types can possibly influence one another. The “similarity” is captured by a graph on types in which individuals of the same or adjacent types can influence one another. We achieve an essentially complete characterization of (stable) equilibrium outcomes and prove convergence from all starting states. We also consider generalizations of this model.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

A one-page abstract of this work has appeared in ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce, 2013.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. M. Abrams & Steven H. Strogatz (2003). Modelling the dynamics of language death. Nature, 424, 900.

S. Aral , L. Muchnik , & A. Sundararajan (2009). Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106 (51), 2154421549.

R. Axelrod (1997). The dissemination of culture. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41 (2), 203226.

E. Ben-Naim , P. Krapivsky , & S. Redner (2003). Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes. Physica D, 183 (3), 190204.

U. Brandes , & T. Erlebach (eds). (2005). Network analysis: Methodological foundations. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

C. Castellano , S. Fortunato , & V. Loreto (2009). Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81, 591646.

D. Centola , J. C. Gonzalez-Avella , V. M. Eguiluz , & M. San Miguel (2007). Homophily, cultural drift, and the co-evolution of cultural groups. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51 (6), 905929.

J. M. Cohen (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology in Education, 50(Oct.), 227241.

G. Deffuant , D. Neau , F. Amblard , & G. Weisbuch (2000). Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems, 3, 8798.

S. Fortunato (2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486, 75174. Eprint arXiv: 0906.0612.

M. S. Handcock , A. E. Raftery , & J. M. Tantrum (2007). Model-based clustering for social networks (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 170, 301354.

P. D. Hoff , A. E. Raftery , & M. S. Handcock (2002). Latent space approaches to social network analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 10901098.

D. B. Kandel (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84 (2), 427436.

T. G. Kurtz (1970). Solutions of ordinary differential equations as limits of pure jump markov processes. Journal of Applied Probability, 7 (1), 4958.

M. McPherson , L. Smith-Lovin , & J. M. Cook (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415444.

M. Patriarca , & T. Leppanen (2004). Modeling language competition. Physica A, 338 (1–2), 296299.

K. Poole , & H. Rosenthal (1991). Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 35 (1), 228278.

S. E. Schaeffer (2007). Graph clustering. Computer Science Review, 1 (1), 2764.

C. R. Shalizi , & A. C. Thomas (2011). Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods and Research, 40, 211239.

D. Spector (2000). Rational debate and one-dimensional conflict. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (1), 181200.

D. Stauffer , X. Castello , V. M. Eguiluz , & M. S. Miguel (2007). Microscopic Abrams-Strogatz model of language competition. Physica A, 374 (2), 835842.

C. Steglich , A.B. Snijders Tom, & M. Pearson (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40, 329393.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Network Science
  • ISSN: 2050-1242
  • EISSN: 2050-1250
  • URL: /core/journals/network-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: