Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Paradoxes in Turkey’s Syria policy: Analyzing the critical episode of agenda building

  • Özlem Tür (a1) and Mehmet Akif Kumral (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

This article explores the discursive reasons behind the paradoxes in Turkey’s foreign policy since the onset of the Syria crisis. By looking at representation of Turkey’s Syria policy in two prominent pro-government newspapers, Star and Yeni Şafak, the authors highlight the significance of the February 2012 episode, after which Ankara experienced deep discursive dilemmas for three reasons: the uncertain portrayal of the dyadic context, the ambiguous framing of third-party roles, and ambivalent agenda building. Despite the shadow of imminent civil war, Turkey’s foreign policy elite refrained from framing the real risks arising within Syria. Idealistic-normative calls appealed to massacre rhetoric in order to legitimize humanitarian intervention. However, the geopolitical framing of third-party roles did not assist in the building of diplomatic ground for international intervention. Quite the contrary, it led to the shaping of public opinion toward realistic-utilitarian interference. Swinging between intervention and interference, Ankara pushed itself toward a liminal position. Even though the Turkish government’s rhetorical ambivalence helped to sway anti-war domestic public opinion, it did not help to control the spiraling of Syria into civil war. That is to say, the ambivalent agenda building in the critical February 2012 episode perpetuated paradoxes in Turkey’s Syria policy and left lingering implications for the transformation of the Syrian crisis in the years to come.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

Author’s Note: This study was conducted at Middle East Technical University as part of the post-doctoral research project (DOSAP) entitled “Understanding Turkey’s Foreign Policy Discourses during the Syrian Crises of 1957 and 2012: A Comparative Analysis of Contextual Thematization in Governmental Framing Practices.” A draft version of this article was presented at the 56th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, New Orleans, February 18–21, 2015. The authors would like to thank Raymond Hinnebusch, Giovanna Dell’Orto, and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Atsız Yağmur. “Elif ve Mertek Yâhut İçimizdeki Suriye.” Star. February 15, 2012.
Babahan Ergun. “Tencere Dibin Kara.” Star. February 7, 2012.
Balzacq Thierry. “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context.” European Journal of International Relations 11, no. 2 (2005): 171201.
Bayram Salih. “Political Parallelism in the Turkish Press, a Historical Interpretation.” Turkish Studies 11, no. 4 (2010): 579611.
Borah Porismita. “Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade’s Literature.” Journal of Communication 61, no. 2 (2011): 246263.
Brighi Elisabetta and Hill Christopher. “Implementation and Behaviour.” In Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Edited by Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield, and Tim Dunne. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. 117135.
Bucher Jessica, Engel Lena, Stephanie Harfensteller, and Hylke Dijkstra. “Domestic Politics, News Media and Humanitarian Intervention: Why France and Germany Diverged Over Libya.” European Security 22, no. 4 (2013): 524539.
Carvalho Anabela. “Media(ted) Discourse and Society: Rethinking the Framework of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journalism Studies 9, no. 2 (2008): 161177.
Cecillon Julien. “Turkey and the Struggle for Syria: Time for Accountability.” Near East Quarterly. March 20, 2013. Cached version available at https://web.archive.org/web/20120830010927/http://www.neareastquarterly.com/index.php/2012/03/20/turkey-and-the-struggle-for-syria-time-for-accountability/.
Chatham House. “The Principle of Non-Intervention in Contemporary International Law: Non-Interference in a State’s Internal Affairs Used to Be a Rule of International Law: Is It Still?” February 28, 2007. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/public/ Research/International%20Law/il280207.pdf.
Dan Viorela and Ihlen Øyvind. “Framing Expertise: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Success in Framing Contests.” Journal of Communication Management 15, no. 4 (2011): 368388.
Davutoğlu Ahmet. “Zero Problems in a New Era: Realpolitik is No Answer to the Challenges Posed by the Arab Spring.” Foreign Policy. March 21, 2013. http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/03/21/zero-problems-in-a-new-era/.
Dedeoğlu Beril. “Kim Kazandı?” Star. February 15, 2012.
Van Dijk Teun A. “Macro Contexts.” In Discourse and International Relations. Edited by U. Dagmar Scheu Lottgen and José Saura Sánchez. Bern: Peter Lang, 2007. 326.
Van Dijk Teun A. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach . New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Dirks Una. “Critical Discourse Analysis of the Iraq Conflict in the British and German ‘Quality’ Press.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 19 (2006): 101123.
Dursun Çiler. “The Struggle Goes On: The Discursive Strategies of the Islamist Press in Turkey.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 14, no. 2 (2006): 161182.
Ertuğrul Doğan. “Humus’ta Kandil Katliamı.” Star. February 5, 2012.
Ertuğrul Doğan. “Katliamın Ardından Yine Şam Tiyatrosu.” Star. February 6, 2012.
Ertuğrul Doğan. “Şükran Rusya, Şükran Çin...!” Star. February 8, 2012.
Fairclough Isabela and Fairclough Norman. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London and New York: Routledge, 2012.
Forsythe David P.Democracy, War, and Covert Action.” Journal of Peace Research 29, no. 4 (1992): 385395.
Fürsich Elfriede. “In Defense of Textual Analysis: Restoring a Challenged Method for Journalism and Media Studies.” Journalism Studies 10, no. 2 (2009): 238252.
Güngör Nasuhi. “Türkiye Hangi Blokta?” Star. February 2, 2012.
Güngör Nasuhi. “Suriye Kimin Umurunda.” Star. February 6, 2012.
Güngör Nasuhi. “Şifre Suriye.” Star. February 9, 2012.
Güngör Nasuhi. “Akan Kan ve Yaratıcı Kaos!” Star. February 10, 2012.
Hammond Philip. Framing Post-Cold War Conflicts: The Media and International Intervention. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2007.
Jamnejad Maziar and Wood Michael. “The Principle of Non-intervention.” Leiden Journal of International Law 22, no. 2 (2009): 345381.
Johnson Loch K. “Covert Action and Accountability: Decision-Making for America’s Secret Foreign Policy.” International Studies Quarterly 33, no. 1 (1989): 81109.
Karagül İbrahim. “Türk Dış Politikası Satılık mı?” Yeni Şafak. February 1, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/yazarlar/IbrahimKaragul/turk-dis-politikasi-satilik-mi/30880.
Karagül İbrahim. “Şam’a Bombalar Yağarken!” Yeni Şafak. February 8, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/yazarlar/IbrahimKaragul/sama-bombalar-yagarken/30982.
Karagül İbrahim. “Hesaplaşma: Kim Kimi Tasfiye Edecek?” Yeni Şafak. February 10, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/yazarlar/IbrahimKaragul/hesaplasma-kim-kimi-tasfiye-edecek/31011.
Karagül İbrahim. “Eller Tetikte!” Yeni Şafak. February 14, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/yazarlar/IbrahimKaragul/eller-tetikte/31069.
Karagül İbrahim. “En Tehlikeli İhtimal: Ya Savaş Tersine Dönerse!” Yeni Şafak. February 16, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/yazarlar/IbrahimKaragul/en-tehlikeli-ihtimal-ya-savas-tersine-donerse/31096.
Karagül İbrahim. “Biz bu Kavgayı ne çok Sevdik!” Yeni Şafak. February 23, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/yazarlar/IbrahimKaragul/biz-bu-kavgayi-ne-cok-sevdik/31208.
Karagül İbrahim. “İkili Savaş: Önce Hangisini Vuralım?” Yeni Şafak. February 24, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/yazarlar/IbrahimKaragul/ikili-savas-once-hangisini-vuralim/31217.
Kaynak Mahir. “Suriye’de Neler Oluyor?” Star. February 12, 2012.
Kaynak Mahir. “Çin’in Stratejisi.” Star. February 25, 2012.
Kienzle Benjamin. “The Role of Ideas in EU Responses to International Crises: Comparing the Cases of Iraq and Iran.” Cooperation and Conflict 48, no. 3 (2013): 423426.
King Erika G. and Wells Robert A.. Framing the Iraq War Endgame: War’s Denouement in an Age of Terror. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
Kiras İbrahim. “Hakan Fidan ve Suriye Krizi.” Star. February 9, 2012.
Kress Gunther. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge, 2010.
Krieg Andreas. Motivations for Humanitarian Intervention: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. Netherlands: Springer, 2013.
Laçiner Sedat. “Hamas ve Suriye.” Star. February 2, 2012.
Laçiner Sedat. “Araplar Darbeci Generallerinden Kurtulmaya Çalışıyor.” Star. February 7, 2012.
Laçiner Sedat. “Obama Doktrini.” Star. February 21, 2012.
McCombs Maxwell. “A Look at Agenda-setting: Past, Present and Future.” Journalism Studies 6, no. 4 (2005): 543557.
McCombs Maxwell E. and Shaw Donald L.. “The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas.” Journal of Communication 43, no. 2 (1993): 5867.
Milojevic Momir. “The Principle of Non-Interference in the Internal Affairs of States.” Law and Politics 1, no. 4 (2000): 427447.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey. “No: 38, 4 Şubat 2012, BM Güvenlik Konseyi’nin Suriye Konusunda Bir Kez Daha Karara Ulaşamaması Hk.” Press release. February 4, 2012. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_-38_-4-subat-2012_-bm-guvenlik-konseyi_nin-suriye-konusunda-bir-kez-daha-karara-ulasamamasi-hk_.tr.mfa.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey. “Süleyman Şah Saygı Karakoluna İlişkin Olarak Sosyal Medyada Yayınlanan Ses Kaydı Hk.” Press release. March 27, 2014. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_-98_-27-mart-2014_-suleyman-sah-saygi-karakoluna-iliskin-olarak-sosyal-medyada-yayinlanan-ses-kaydi-hk.tr.mfa.
Morgenthau Hans J. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1946. Quoted in Robert J. Art and Robert Jervis, eds. International Politics: Enduring Concepts and Contemporary Issues. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers, 1996.
Öniş Ziya. “Turkey and the Arab Spring: Between Ethics and Self-Interest.” Insight Turkey 14, no. 3 (2012): 4563.
Phillips Christopher. “Into the Quagmire: Turkey’s Frustrated Syria Policy.” Chatham House Briefing Paper. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2012.
Prager Carol A.L. “Intervention and Empire: John Stuart Mill and International Relations.” Political Studies 53, no. 3 (2005): 621640.
Reese Stephen D. “The Framing Project: A Bridging Model for Media Research Revisited.” Journal of Communication 57, no. 1 (2007): 148154.
Robinson Piers. “The Role of Media and Public Opinion.” In Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Edited by Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield, and Tim Dunne. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. 137153.
Scheufele Dietram A. “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication 49, no. 1 (1999): 103122.
Scheufele Dietram A.Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication.” Mass Communication and Society 3, no. 2–3 (2000): 297316.
Star . “Davutoğlu Yeni Predatör için ABD’ye Uçuyor.” February 2, 2012.
Star . “Devler BM’de Suriye için Düelloya Tutuştu.” February 2, 2012.
Star . “Kandil Gecesi Katliam.” February 5, 2012.
Star . “Acaba İran ne Diyecek.” February 6, 2012.
Star . “BM’de Rusya ve Çin Vetosu ‘Öldürme İzni.’” February 6, 2012.
Star . “PKK Esad’la Birlikte Savaşıyor.” February 6, 2012.
Star . “Star Katliamın Kalbinde.” February 6, 2012.
Star . “BM Veto Krizi Büyüyor Esad Sivilleri Öldürüyor.” February 7, 2012.
Star . “Başbakan Erdoğan Esad’ı Uyardı: Humus’un Hesabı Sorulacak.” February 8, 2012.
Star . “Esad Uluslararası Arenadaki Destekçilerine Sığındı: Şükran Rusya, Şükran Çin…!” February 8, 2012.
Star . “Tuhaf Bir Davet.” February 9, 2012.
Star . “Türkiye, Suriye’de Zulmün Devamına İzin Vermeyecek.” February 9, 2012.
Star . “Pentagon Suriye’ye ‘Askeri Müdahale’ Hazırlığında.” February 10, 2012.
Star . “Esad’ı Durdurmak için Barış Gücü.” February 13, 2012.
Star . “BM Karar Alamadıkça Suriye Cesaretleniyor.” February 15, 2012.
Star . “ABD’den Kimyasal Silah İkazı.” February 16, 2012.
Star . “Katliam Ortağı Rusya,” February 18, 2012.
Star . “Suriye Bölünmek İsteniyor.” February 19, 2012.
Talu Umur. “Medyanın Siyasi İdeolojilere Etkileri.” In Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce, Cilt 9: Dönemler ve Zihniyetler. Edited by Ömer Laçiner. İstanbul: İletişim Yayıncılık, 2009. 902916.
TRTHaber . “Helikopterin Düşürülmesi Sürpriz Değil: AK Parti Grup Başkanvekili Mahir Ünal Gündeme İlişkin Soruları Cevapladı.” September, 16, 2013. http://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/helikopterin-dusurulmesi-surpriz-degil-101078.html.
Wolfe Michelle, Jones Bryan D. and Baumgartner Frank R.. “A Failure to Communicate: Agenda Setting in Media and Policy Studies.” Political Communication 30, no. 2 (2013): 175192.
Yeni Şafak . “Dışişleri: Esad Yönetme Meşruiyetini Kaybetti.” February 4, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/politika-haber/disisleri-esad-yonetme-mesruiyetini-kaybetti-04.02.2012-365817.
Yeni Şafak . “PKK Yanlısı Yayınlar Esed’i Destekliyor.” February 5, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/dunya-haber/pkk-yanlisi-yayinlar-esedi-destekliyor-05.02.2012-365927.
Yeni Şafak . “Vetonun Bedelini Türkler ve Araplar Ödeyecek.” February 5, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/dunya-haber/vetonun-bedelini-turkler-ve-araplar-odeyecek-05.02.2012-365928.
Yeni Şafak . “Şam Bilmecesi.” February 7, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/dunya-haber/sam-bilmecesi-07.02.2012-366212.
Yeni Şafak . “Türkmen Mahallesi Kuşatma Altında.” February 7, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/dunya-haber/turkmen-mahallesi-kusatma-altinda-07.02.2012-366213.
Yeni Şafak . “Er ya da Geç Humus’un Hesabı Sorulacak.” February 8, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/politika-haber/er-ya-da-gec-humusun-hesabi-sorulacak-08.02.2012-366477.
Yeni Şafak . “Yargı Skandalı.” February 9, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/gundem-haber/yargi-skandali-09.02.2012-366682.
Yeni Şafak . “Gül: Kurumlar Suçlanırken Dikkatli Olunmalı.” February 10, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/politika-haber/gul-kurumlar-suclanirken-dikkatli-olunmali-10.02.2012-366892.
Yeni Şafak . “Herkes Büyük Resme Baksın.” February 11, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/politika-haber/herkes-buyuk-resme-baksin-11.02.2012-367032.
Yeni Şafak . “Fransa, Suriye’ye İnsani Koridor için Rusya’yla Görüşüyor.” February 15, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/dunya-haber/fransa-suriyeye-insani-koridor-icin-rusyayla-gorusuyor-15.02.2012-367726.
Yeni Şafak . “G-20 Toplantısında Yeni Girişim Önerisi.” February 21, 2012. http://yenisafak.com.tr/dunya-haber/g-20-toplantisinda-yeni-girisim-onerisi-21.02.2012-368752.
Zentürk Ardan. “Sınırdaki ‘Büyük’ Tehdit.” Star. February 2, 2012.
Zentürk Ardan. “İran ‘Dolar’ı Tehdit Ediyor.” Star. February 6, 2012.
Zentürk Ardan. “Türkiye Müdahale Etmeli mi?” Star. February 9, 2012.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

New Perspectives on Turkey
  • ISSN: 0896-6346
  • EISSN: 1305-3299
  • URL: /core/journals/new-perspectives-on-turkey
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 110 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 482 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 9th January 2017 - 21st January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.