Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:12:56.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theatre, Linguistics, and Two Productions of ‘No Man's Land’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Abstract

Pursuing the theme of the preceding article, on possible approaches to the teaching of theatre analysis. Susan Melrose here suggests that contemporary linguistics offers a methodology which may help us to look at dramatic texts in such a way as to discover a semantics which transcends the merely verbal. The author proceeds to test her suggested method in a comparative examination of two actual productions – a French and an English version of Pinter's No Man's Land – and looks in detail at the opening scene of Julius Caesar. She concludes that in both cases what the actor often senses intuitively may also be analyzed ‘in process’ in terms of the language and rhetoric of the text. Susan Melrose is presently a Lecturer in Theatre Studies in the University of Tunis. She presented an earlier version of this paper to the Conference on Theatre Analysis held in May 1984 at the University of Warwick, after completing her doctorate at the Sorbonne Nouvelle.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1. Pavis, P., ‘Towards a Semiology of the Mise en scene?’ in Languages of the Stage: Essays in the Semiology of the Theatre (New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications, 1982).Google Scholar

2. Kristeva's, Julia work has been translated as Desire in Language: a Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, ed. Roudiez, L. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar

3. See in particular Halliday's Language as Social Semiotic: the Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning (London: Edward Arnold, 1979).Google Scholar

4. Fawcett, R., Cognitive Linguistics and Social Interaction (Heidelberg and Exeter, 1980).Google Scholar

5. Pavis, P., ‘Problèmes d'une sémiologie du geste théâtral’, in Voix et images de la scène: essais de sémiologie théâtrale (Presses Universitaires de Lille, 1982).Google Scholar

6. Jakobson, R., ‘Linguistics and Poetics’, in Sebeok, T., ed., Style in Language (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1960).Google Scholar

7. Serpieri, A. et al. , ‘Towards a Segmentation of the Dramatic Text’, in Poetics Today: Drama, Theater, Performance: a Semiotic Perspective, II, 3 (Spring 1981).Google Scholar

8. Ariane Mnouchkine's text is available from the Théâtre du Soleil, Vincennes, France. The production was first performed in 1982, and is part of a Shakespeare cycle performed by the Théâtre du Soleil.

9. Pinter, H., No Man's Land (London: Eyre Methuen, 1975).Google Scholar

10. Pinter, H., No Man's Land, suivi d'autres pièces, adaptation française d'Eric Kahane (Paris: Gallimard, 1979).Google Scholar