Skip to main content Accessibility help

Object Shift in spoken Mainland Scandinavian: A corpus study of Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish

  • Kristine Bentzen (a1), Merete Anderssen (a2) and Christian Waldmann (a3)


Recent work on Object Shift (OS) suggests that this is not as uniform an operation as traditionally assumed. In this paper, we examine OS in the spontaneous speech of adults in large Danish, Norwegian and Swedish child language corpora in order to explore variation with respect to OS across these three languages. We evaluate our results against three recent strands of accounts of OS, namely a prosodic/phonological account, an account in terms of cognitive status, and an account in terms of information structure. Our investigation shows that there is both within-language and across-language variation in the application of OS, and that the three accounts can explain some of our data. However, all accounts are faced with challenges, especially when explaining exceptional cases.



Hide All
Anderssen, Merete. 2006. The Acquisition of Compositional Definiteness. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Anderssen, Merete & Bentzen, Kristine. 2011. Scandinavian Object Shift reanalyzed as TP-internal topicalization. Presented at the Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop (CGSW) 26, Amsterdam, June 2011.
Anderssen, Merete & Bentzen, Kristine. 2012. Norwegian Object Shift as IP-internal Topicalization. In Bentzen, Kristine & Fábregas, Antonio (eds.), The Grammar of Objects, special issue of Nordlyd 39 (1), 123.
Anderssen, Merete, Bentzen, Kristine & Rodina, Yulia. 2012. Topicality and complexity in the acquisition of Norwegian Object Shift. Language Acquisition 19 (1), 3972.
Anderssen, Merete, Bentzen, Kristine, Rodina, Yulia & Westergaard, Marit. 2011. The acquisition of apparent optionality: Word order in Subject and Object Shift constructions in Norwegian. In Anderssen, Merete, Bentzen, Kristine & Westergaard, Marit (eds.), Variation in the Input: Studies in the Acquisition of Word Order (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 39), 241270. New York: Springer.
Andréasson, Maia. 2008. Not all objects are born alike – accessibility as a key to pronominal object shift in Swedish and Danish. In Butt, Miriam & King, Tracy Holloway (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG08 Conference, 2645. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Andréasson, Maia. 2009. Pronominal object shift – not just a matter of shifting or not. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84, 120.
Andréasson, Maia. 2010. Object shift or object placement in general. In Butt, Miriam & King, Tracy Holloway (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG10 Conference, 2642. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Andréasson, Maia. 2013. Object shift in Scandinavian languages: The impact of contrasted elements. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36 (2), 187217. [This issue]
Andréasson, Maia, Engdahl, Elisabet & Lindahl, Filippa. 2013. Objektsrealisering och informationsstruktur i NDC – vart tar de pronominella objekten vägen? Presented at Dialektseminar 2013, Oslo, January 2013.
Bentzen, Kristine. 2013. Object Shift. Nordic Atlas of Linguistic Structures (NALS).
Bentzen, Kristine, Merchant, Jason & Svenonus, Peter. To appear. Deep properties of surface pronouns: Pronominal predicate anaphors in Norwegian and other Germanic languages. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics (2014).
Bleses, Dorthe & Basbøll, Hans. 2004. The Danish sound structure – implications for language acquisition in normal and hearing impaired populations. In Schmidt, Erik, Mikkelsen, Ulla, Post, Inge, Simonsen, Jørn Borcher & Fruensgaard, Kirsten (eds.), Brain, Hearing and Learning: 20th Danavox Symposium 200, 165190. Copenhagen: Holmen Center Tryk.
Bleses, Dorthe, Basbøll, Hans & Werner Vach, . 2011. Is Danish difficult to acquire? Evidence from Nordic past-tense studies. Language and Cognitive Processes 26 (8), 11931231.
Borthen, Kaja. 2003. Norwegian Bare Singulars. Ph.D. dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Borthen, Kaja, Fretheim, Torstein & Gundel, Jeanette. 1997. What brings a higher-order entity into focus of attention? In Mitkov, Ruslan & Boguraev, Branimir (eds.), Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution: Proceedings from a Workshop Sponsored by the ACL, 8893. Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2005. Sound patterns of syntax: Object Shift. Theoretical Linguistics 31, 4793.
Fox, Danny & Pesetsky, David. 2005. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31 (1/2), 145.
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In Winkler, Susanne & Schwabe, Kerstin (eds.), On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, 87116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, Thomas. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. Givón, In Thomas (ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study, 541. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Grønnum, Nina. 2003. Why are the Danes so hard to understand? In Jacobsen, Henrik Galberg, Bleses, Dorthe, Madsen, Thomas O. & Thomsen, Pia (eds.), Take Danish — For Instance: Linguistic Studies in Honour of Hans Basbøll Presented on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, 12 July 2003, 119130. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
Gundel, Jeanette, Borthen, Kaja & Fretheim, Thorstein. 1999. The role of context in pronominal reference to higher order entities in English and Norwegian. In Bouquet, Paolo, Serafini, Luciano, Brézillon, Patrick & Castellani, Francesca (eds.), Modeling and Using Context: Proceedings from the Second International and Interdiciplinary Conference, CONTEXT '99 (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1688), 475478. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.
Gundel, Jeanette, Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69, 274307.
Gundel, Jeanette, Hegarty, Michael & Borthen, Kaja. 2003. Cognitive status, information structure, and pronominal reference to clausally introduced entities. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (3), 281299.
Hankamer, Jorge & Sag, Ivan A.. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 391426.
Hegarty, Michael. 2003. Semantic types and abstract entities. Lingua 113, 891927.
Hellan, Lars & Platzack, Christer. 1995. Pronouns in Scandinavian languages: An overview. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 56, 4769.
Hilton, Nanna Haug, Schüppert, Anja & Gooskens, Charlotte. 2011. Syllable reduction and articulation rates in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 34 (2), 215237.
Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Stockholm.
Holmberg, Anders. 1999. Remarks on Holmberg's Generalization. Studia Linguistica 53 (1), 139.
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer. 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hosono, Mayumi. 2010. Scandinavian Object Shift as the cause of downstep. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 85, 136.
Houser, Michael J., Mikkelsen, Line & Toosarvandani, Maziar. 2008. Verb phrase pronominalization in Danish: Deep or surface anaphora? In Brainbridge, Erin & Agbayani, Brian (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Western Conference on Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, California State University, Fresno, CA, 183–195.
Johannessen, Janne Bondi, Priestley, Joel, Hagen, Kristin, Åfarli, Tor Anders & Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 2009. The Nordic Dialect Corpus – an Advanced Research Tool. In Jokinen, Kristiina & Bick, Eckhard (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics NODALIDA 2009 (NEALT Proceedings Series Volume 4), 73–80.
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2001. The true nature of Holmberg's Generalization revisited – once again. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 67, 85192.
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2003. Four myths of Object Shift . . . and the truth. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög & Sigurðsson, Halldór (eds.), Grammar in Focus, vol. II: Festchrift for Christer Platzack, November 18, 2003, 199207. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University.
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2010a. Object Shift and optionality: An intricate interplay between syntax, prosody and information structure. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 86, 124.
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2010b. ‘Disagreeing’ pronominal reference in Swedish and the interplay between formal and semantic gender. Lingua 120, 20952120.
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2011. Deconstructing Object Shift. Presented at the VAMOS Workshop Objects – Information Structure, Prosody and Acquisition, 4–6 April 2011, University of Tromsø.
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2012. Deconstructing (pronominal) Object Shift. Presented at the Workshop on Scandinavian Object Shift, March 2012, University of Gothenburg.
Lødrup, Helge. 1994. ‘Surface proforms’ in Norwegian and the definiteness effect. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 24, 303315. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association (GLSA).
Lødrup, Helge. 2012. Some Norwegian ‘type anaphora’ are surface anaphora. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 24 (1), 2352.
MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah, NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mikkelsen, Line. 2011. On prosody and focus in Object Shift. Syntax 14 (3), 230264.
Ørsnes, Bjarne. 2013. VP-anaphors and Object Shift: What do VP-anaphors reveal about the licensing conditions for Object Shift in Danish? Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36 (2), 245–274. [This issue]
Pedersen, Karen Margrethe. 1993. Letledsregelen og lighedsregelen. Novation, ekspansion og resistens. In Pedersen, Inge Lise & Pedersen, Karen Margrethe (eds.), Jyske studier tilegnede Magda Nyberg og Bent Jul Nielsen, 199218. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
Plunkett, Kim. 1985. Preliminary Approaches to Language Development. Århus: Århus University Press.
Plunkett, Kim. 1986. Learning strategies in two Danish children's language development. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 27, 6473.
Plunkett, Kim & Strömqvist, Sven. 1992. The acquisition of Scandinavian languages. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, 457556. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27, 5394.
Richthoff, Ulla. 2000. En svensk barnspråkskorpus: uppbyggnad och analyser. Licentiate thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1996. The prosodic structure of function words. In Morgan, James L. & Demuth, Katherine (eds.), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition, 187214. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Simonsen, Hanne Gram. 1990. Barns fonologi: system og variasjon hos tre norske og et samoisk barn. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oslo.
Strawson, Peter. 1963. Identifying reference and truth values. Theoria 30, 96118.
Strömqvist, Sven, Richthoff, Ulla & Andersson, Anders-Börje. 1993. Strömqvist's and Richthoff's corpora: A guide to longitudinal data from four Swedish children (Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 66). Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2001. Object Shift and scrambling. In Baltin, Mark & Collins, Chris (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 148202. Oxford: Blackwell.
Vikner, Sten. 1994. Scandinavian Object Shift and West Germanic scrambling. In Corver, Norbert & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), Studies on Scrambling, 487517. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vikner, Sten. 2006. Object Shift. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. III, 392436. Oxford: Blackwell.
Vogel, Ralf. 2006. Weak function word shift. Linguistics 44 (5), 10591097.
Wikström, Åsa. 2008. Den finita satsen i små barns språk. Licentiate thesis, Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed