Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Harðarson, Gísli Rúnar 2016. A case for a Weak Case Contiguity hypothesis—a reply to Caha. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory,


    Engdahl, Elisabet and Laanemets, Anu 2015. Prepositional passives in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish: A corpus study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 38, Issue. 03, p. 285.


    Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann 2011. On the New Passive. Syntax, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 148.


    Maling, Joan 2001. Dative: The heterogeneity of the mapping among morphological case, grammatical functions, and thematic roles. Lingua, Vol. 111, Issue. 4-7, p. 419.


    Roberts, Linda 1995. Pivots, voice and macroroles: From Germanic to universal grammar. Australian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 15, Issue. 2, p. 157.


    Sprouse, Rex A. 1995. Insights in Germanic Linguistics, I, Methodology in Transition.


    Holmberg, Anders and Platzack, Christer 1990. Issues in Germanic Syntax.


    Faarlund, Jan Terje 1989. Language Change.


    ×

Preposition-Stranding and Passive*

  • Joan Maling (a1) and Annie Zaenen (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0332586500001335
  • Published online: 22 December 2008
Abstract

Various linguists working within the theory of Government and Binding (e.g. Hornstein & Weinberg (1981), Kayne (1981)) have attempted to provide a unified account of preposition-stranding. This article uses evidence from Icelandic to show that preposition-stranding is not a unified phenomenon. Although Icelandic freely allows preposition-stranding in wh-movement constructions, it lacks prepositional passives in which the prepositional object of an active verb corresponds to the grammatical subject of a passive verb. Various syntactic tests which distinguish between grammatical subjects and topicalized NPs are used to demonstrate this. Our conclusion is that while lexical reanalysis is needed to account for prepositional passives, no such reanalysis is warranted for preposition-stranding due to wh-movement; hence, an adequate theory of preposition-stranding must allow for two separate parameters.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Zaenen , J. Maling & H. Thrainsson 1984. Passive and Oblique Case. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax No. 16, University of Trondheim; revised version, entitled “Case and Grammatical Functions: the Icelandic Passive,” to appear in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 441483.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Nordic Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0332-5865
  • EISSN: 1502-4717
  • URL: /core/journals/nordic-journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×