Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:23:01.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Economy of Water Quality Protection from Agricultural Chemicals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

David G. Abler  and
James S. Shortle
David G. Abler
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University
James S. Shortle
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Extract

Growing evidence of surface-water and groundwater contamination has led to demands for federal and state water quality protection policies. Agriculture will be an important target of such policies. Numerous instances of surface-water and groundwater contamination by pesticides and fertilizers have been recorded, and one study estimates that the drinking water of 50 million people in the U.S. is potentially contaminated by agricultural chemicals (Hallberg, Nielsen and Lee).

Type
The Effects of Agricultural Production on Environmental Quality
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , April 1991 , pp. 53 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abler, D. G., and Shortle, J. S. “Evaluating Environmental Policies for Agriculture in the EC and US.” In Environmental Policy and the Economy, edited by Dietz, F., Van der Ploeg, R., and van der Straaten, J. Amsterdam: North-Holland, forthcoming 1991.Google Scholar
Bartel, A. P., and Thomas, L. G. “Predation through Regulation: The Wage and Profit Effects of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency.” Journal of Law and Economics 30 (1987):239–64.Google Scholar
Bohm, P., and Russell, C. “Comparative Analysis of Alternative Policy Instruments.” In Handbook of Natural Resource Economics, edited by Kneese, A. Y. and Sweeny, J. L., vol. 1. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., 1985.Google Scholar
Browne, W. P. Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1988.Google Scholar
DeCoursey, D. G. “Mathematical Models for Nonpoint Water Pollution Control.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 40 (1985):508–13.Google Scholar
Gardner, B. L. The Economics of Agricultural Policies. New York: Macmillan, 1987.Google Scholar
Hallberg, G. R. “From Hoes to Herbicides.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 41 (1986):357–64.Google Scholar
Harrington, W., Krupnick, A. J., and Peskin, H. M. “Policies for Nonpoint-Source Water Pollution Control.” Journal of Soil and Water Conversation 40 (1985):27–36.Google Scholar
McSweeny, W. T., and Kramer, R. A. “The Integration of Farm Programs for Achieving Soil Conservation and Nonpoint Pollution Control Objectives.” Land Economics 62 (1986):159–73.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Alternative Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. G., and Lee, L. K. The Magnitude and Cost of Groundwater Contamination from Agricultural Chemicals—A National Perspective. USDA-ERS Agricultural Economics Report no. 576. 1987.Google Scholar
Pashigian, B. P. “Environmental Regulation: Whose Self-Interests Are Being Protected?” Economic Inquiry 23 (1985):551–84.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, A. “Going with the Flow: USDA's Dubious Commitment to Water Quality.” Environmental Forum 7 (September-October 1988):15–18.Google Scholar
Russell, C. S. “Monitoring and Enforcement.” In Public Policies for Environmental Protection, edited by Portney, P. R. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1990.Google Scholar
Shortle, J. S., and Dunn, J. W. “The Relative Efficiency of Agricultural Source Pollution Control Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1986):668–77.Google Scholar