Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-v64r6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-25T11:48:08.281Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true
  • English

Evocative Listening: Mediated practices in everyday life1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2012

Rui Chaves  and
Pedro Rebelo
Rui Chaves*
Affiliation:
Sonic Arts Research Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
Pedro Rebelo*
Affiliation:
Sonic Arts Research Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
*
E-mail: **rchaves01@qub.ac.uk
†p.rebelo@qub.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The history of sonic arts is charged with transgressive practices that seek to expose the social, aural and cultural thresholds across various listening experiences, posing new questions in terms of the dialogue between listener and place. Recent work in sonic art exposes the need for an experiential understanding of listening that foregrounds the use of new personal technologies, environmental philosophy and the subject–object relationship. This paper aims to create a vocabulary that better contextualises recent installations and performances produced within the context of everyday life, by researchers and artists at the Sonic Arts Research Centre at Queen's University Belfast.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 17 , Special Issue 3: Sound, Listening and Place II , December 2012 , pp. 216 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We wish to thank Florian Hollerweger and Matt Green for their insight and help. Parts of this paper, appear in Rebelo, Green and Hollerweger 2008. We also wish to acknowledge the contribution of Fundação Ciência e Tecnologia (www.fctes.mct.pt) towards Rui Chaves’ PhD funding, making this research possible.

References

Blesser, Barry. 2007. Spaces Speak, Are You Listening?: Experiencing Aural Architecture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Michael. 2004. Thinking about Sound, Proximity, and Distance in Western Experience: The Case of Odysseus's Walkman. In Veit Erlmann, ed., Hearing Cultures: Essays on Sound, Listening and Modernity. Oxford: Berg, 173–190.Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chion, M. 1994. Audio-Vision. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Connor, Steven. 1997. The Modern Auditory I. In Roy Porter, ed., Rewriting the Self: Histories from the Renaissance to the Present. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coyne, Richard. 2010. The Tuning of Place: Sociable Spaces and Pervasive Digital Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Debord, Guy et al. 2006. Situationist International Anthology, ed. and trans. Ken Knabb. Bureau of Secrets, http://www.cddc.vt.edu/bps/SI/index.htm.Google Scholar
Fontana, Bill. 2006. Harmonic Bridge, http://echosounddesign.com/media/Harmonic_BridgeH.mov.Google Scholar
Hollerweger, Florian. 2010. Music for Lovers: Shared Binaurality in a Mobile Sound Installation. Performance Research 15(3) (September): 11–14 http://www.doi:10.1080/13528165.2010.527193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S.J. 2008. Listeners and Imagination: A Quaternary Framework for Electroacoustic Music Listening and Acousmatic Reasoning. PhD thesis, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Kim, S.J. 2010. Imaginal Listening: A Quaternary Framework for Listening to Electroacoustic Music and Phenomena of Sound-Images. Organised Sound 15(1): 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBelle, Brandon. 2006. Background Noise: Perspectives on Sound Art. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
LaBelle, Brandon. 2010. Acoustic Territories: Sound Culture and Everyday Life. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ledrut, Raymond. 1986. Speech and the Silence of the City. In M. Gottdiener and Alexandros Ph. Lagopoulos, eds, The City and the Sign: An Introduction to Urban Semiotics. New York: Columbia University Press, 114–134.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. 2007. Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rebelo, Pedro, Green, Matt, Hollerweger, Florian. 2008. A Typology for Listening in Place. In Proceedings of the 2008 Mobile Music Workshop, University of Applied Arts Vienna, Austria, 15–18.Google Scholar
Renaud, Alain, Carot, Alexander, Rebelo, Pedro. 2007. Networked Music Performance: State of the Art. In Audio Engineering Society (AES) 30th International Conference on Intelligent Audio Environments, 15–17 March 2007, Saariselka, Finland. http://www.somasa.qub.ac.uk/~comedia/resources/AES_30_Paper_AR_AC_PR_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
Schafer, R. 1994. The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Rochester VT: Destiny Books.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Salome. 2010. Listening to Noise and Silence: Toward a Philosophy of Sound Art. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Chaves and Rebelo supplementary movie

Movie 1

Download Chaves and Rebelo supplementary movie(Video)
Video 106 MB

Chaves and Rebelo supplementary movie

Movie 1

Download Chaves and Rebelo supplementary movie(Video)
Video 47 MB

Chaves and Rebelo supplementary movie

Movie 2

Download Chaves and Rebelo supplementary movie(Video)
Video 34 MB

Chaves and Rebelo supplementary movie

Movie 2

Download Chaves and Rebelo supplementary movie(Video)
Video 12 MB

Chaves and Rebelo sound file

Sound file 1

Download Chaves and Rebelo sound file(Audio)
Audio 17 MB

Chaves and Rebelo sound file

Sound file 2

Download Chaves and Rebelo sound file(Audio)
Audio 12 MB