Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-xtmlv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-04-02T05:23:09.415Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Making Acoustic Computer Music: The Rumentarium project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2013

Andrea Valle*
CIRMA/StudiUm – Università degli Studi di Torino, via Sant'Ottavio 20, 10124 Torino, Italy E-mail:


The article describes the design, production and usage of the ‘Rumentarium’, a computer-based sound generating system involving physical objects as sound sources. The Rumentarium is a set of handmade resonators, acoustically excited by DC motors, interfaced to the computer by means of various microcontrollers. Following an ecological/anthropological approach, in the Rumentarium discarded materials are used as sound sources. Every instrument is ‘produced while designed’ in an improvisation-like manner, starting from available materials. In this way, hardware is ‘softened’: that is, it can be continuously modified as in software development. Analogously, the onsite setup is very light, so that components can be added or removed on the fly, even while the Rumentarium is at work. Differently from typical computer music, the Rumentarium, while entirely computationally controlled, is an acoustic sound generator. On one hand, the Rumentarium can be played like an instrument in conjunction with a MIDI controller, for use in live musical performance. On the other side, it can be driven by algorithmic strategies. In this way, the Rumentarium can be configured also as a sound installation, in a standalone mode. Some artistic works are discussed while introducing the various control modalities that have been specifically developed for the Rumentarium.

Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


AMP2. 2010. Hopeful Monster. Milan: Die Schachtel-Zeit, Imp1.9.Google Scholar
BANA (Braille Authority of North America). 2013. Braille Basics. Scholar
Banzi, M. 2009. Getting Started with Arduino. Sebastopol: O'Reilly.Google Scholar
Beall Center Installation. 2013. UC Irvine (2004). Scholar
Bowers, J. 2002. Improvising Machines Ethnographically Informed Design for Improvised Electro-Acoustic Music (Master's thesis in music). Norwich: University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
Bowers, J., Archer, P. 2005. Not Hyper, Not Meta, Not Cyber but Infra-Instruments. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 5–10.Google Scholar
Brown, C.M. 1988. Human-Computer Interface Design Guidelines. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cage, J., Knowles, A. (eds.) 1969. Notations. New York: Something Else Press.Google Scholar
Chadabe, J. 1996. Electric Sound: The Past and Promise of Electronic Music. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Collins, N. 2006. Handmade Electronic Music. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Constante. 2013. 2006 proyecto sonoro. Scholar
CYSP 1. 2013. Dansant sur le toit de la Cité radieuse. Scholar
Eliot, T.S. 2001. The Waste Land (1921). New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Facchin, G. 1989. Le percussioni. Turin: EDT.Google Scholar
Fontanille, J. 1998. Sémiotique du discours. Limoges: PULIM.Google Scholar
Gann, K. 1995. The Music of Conlon Nancarrow. Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ghazala, R. 2005. Circuit-Bending. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.Google Scholar
Goto, S. 2006. The Case Study of an Application of the System, ‘Bodysuit’ and ‘Roboticmusic’: Its Introduction and Aesthetics. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Paris: IRCAM, 292–295.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J. 1991. Bully for Brontosaurus: Reflections in Natural History. New York and London: Norton.Google Scholar
Hornbostel, E.M., Sachs, C. 1961. Classification of Musical Instruments. The Galpin Society Journal 14: 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulten, P. (ed.) 1987. Una magia più forte della morte. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Igoe, T. 2007. Making Things Talk. Sebastopol: O'Reilly.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Waugh, L. 1979. The Sound Shape of Language. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jordà, S. 2002. FMOL. Toward User-Friendly, Sophisticated New Musical Instruments. Computer Music Journal 26(3): 2339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapur, A. 2005. A History of Robotic Musical Instruments. Proceedings of the 2005 International Computer Music Conference, Barcelona/San Francisco: 21–8.Google Scholar
LaBelle, B. 2006. Background Noise: Perspectives on Sound Art. New York and London: Continuum.Google Scholar
LaPorte, Jean-François. 2013. Scholar
Larman, C., Basili, V.R. 2003. Iterative and Incremental Development: A Brief History. Computer 36(6): 4756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitman, S. 2011. Trimpin: An Interview. Computer Music Journal 35(4): 1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemur. 2013. League of Electronic Musical Urban Robots. Scholar
Maes, L., Raes, G.W., Rogers, T. 2011. The Man and Machine Robot Orchestra at Logos. Computer Music Journal 35(4): 2848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oja, C.J. 2000. George Antheil's Ballet Mécanique and Transatlantic Modernism. In T. Ludington (ed.) A Modern Mosaic: Art and Modernism in the United States. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, D., Igoe, T. 2004. Physical Computing. Boston, MA: Course Technology.Google Scholar
Performa. 2013. Music for 16 Futurist Noise Intoners. Scholar
Prieberg, F.K. 1960. Musica ex machina: Über das Verhältnis von Musik und Technik. Berlin, Frankfurt and Vienna: Ullstein.Google Scholar
Richards, J. 2008. Getting the Hands Dirty. Leonardo Music Journal 18: 2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roads, C. 1996. The Computer Music Tutorial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, A.F. 1996. The Ironies of System D. In C. Cerny and S. Seriff (eds.) Recycled Re-Seen. Santa Fe, NM: Museum of International Folk Art.Google Scholar
Sanfilippo, D., Valle, A. 2013. Feedback Systems: An Analytical Framework. Computer Music Journal 37(2): 3037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, T. (ed.) 2009. Notations 21. New York: Mark Batty.Google Scholar
Schaeffner, A. 1994. Origine des instruments de musique (1936). Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar
Seriff, S. 1996. Folk Art from the Global Scrap Heap: The Place of Irony in the Politics of Poverty. In C. Cerny and S. Seriff (eds.) Recycled Re-Seen. Santa Fe, NM: Museum of International Folk Art.Google Scholar
Tamborrini, P. 2009. Design sostenibile. Milan: Electa.Google Scholar
Valle, A. 2002. La notazione musicale contemporanea: Aspetti semiotici ed estetici. Turin: De Sono-EDT.Google Scholar
Valle, A. 2010. The Rumentarium Project. Proceedings of ACM-MM10. Florence and NewYork, ACM, 1413–1416.Google Scholar
Valle, A. 2011a. Audio Physical Computing. Proceedings of SMC11. Padova: SMC. Scholar
Valle, A. 2011b. Live Writing with the Rumentarium. Computer Music Journal, DVD 35(4). Scholar
Valle, A. 2013a. Andrea Valle's Video on Vimeo. Scholar
Valle, A. 2013b. Vedute della Luna scritten in braille. Rome: Nephogram, npg019. Scholar
VV, AA. 2004. Composers Inside Electronics: Music After David Tudor. Leonardo Music Journal 14.Google Scholar
Wilson, S., Cottle, D., Collins, N. (eds.) 2010. The SuperCollider Book. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar