Skip to main content Accessibility help

Ecological Psychology and the Electroacoustic Concert Context

  • James Andean (a1)


An application of ecological psychology, based on the work of James J. Gibson, to electroacoustic music would consider the listener in relationship with both the work and the environment, in a dynamic and mutually informing relationship. This perspective is applied to various electroacoustic concert paradigms, demonstrating a wide range of listening experiences; the implications for electroacoustic music as a genre are examined. Several qualities of acousmatic music are used to explore some potential limitations of Gibson's theories. Finally, some relative strengths and weaknesses of ecological psychology are considered, as well as some potentially fruitful cooperations with other, somewhat divergent, theoretical approaches.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Atkinson, S. 2007. Interpretation and Musical Signification in Acousmatic Listening. Organised Sound 12(2): 113122.
Barker, R.G. 1971. Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Basanta, A. 2010. Syntax as Sign: The Use of Ecological Models within a Semiotic Approach to Electroacoustic Composition. Organised Sound 15(2): 125132.
Clarke, E.F. 2005. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Costall, A., Still, A. 1989. Gibson's Theory of Direct Perception and the Problem of Cultural Relativism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19(4): 433441.
Dashow, J. 1987. Sequence Symbols (1984). On New Computer Music. Mainz: Wergo, 2010–50.
Dashow, J. 2002. Looking into Sequence Symbols. In T. Licata (ed.), Electronic Music: Analytical Perspectives. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Emmerson, S. 2007a. Living Electronic Music. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Emmerson, S. 2007b. Spaces, Rituals, Genres. In F. Barrière and C. Clozier (eds.), Current Approaches in Electroacoustic Music/Relationships Between the Creator and the Listener in Electroacoustic Music. Bourges: Mnémosyne.
Frengel, M. 2010. A Multidimensional Approach to Relationships Between Live and Non-Live Sources in Mixed Works. Organised Sound 15(2): 96106.
Gibson, J.J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J.J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. London: Houghton Mifflin.
Ginsburg, G.P. 1990. The Ecological Perception Debate: An Affordance of the Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(4): 347364.
Johnston, S. 1985. Film Narrative and the Structuralist Controversy. In P. Cook (ed.), The Cinema Book. London: British Film Institute.
Kendall, G.S. 2010. Meaning in Electroacoustic Music and the Everyday Mind. Organised Sound 15(1): 6374.
McAdams, S. 1984. Spectral Fusion, Spectral Parsing, and the Formation of Auditory Images. Unpublished PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Sanders, J.T. 1997. An Ontology of Affordances. Ecological Psychology 9(1): 97112.
Small, Christopher. 1998. Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Hanover, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
Truax, B. 2001. Acoustic Communication. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Windsor, W.L. 1995. A Perceptual Approach to the Description and Analysis of Acousmatic Music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University.
Windsor, W.L. 2004. An Ecological Approach to Semiotics. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34(2): 179198.
Wishart, T. 1996. On Sonic Art. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Ecological Psychology and the Electroacoustic Concert Context

  • James Andean (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.