Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:36:47.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wavefront Aesthetics: Attuning to a dark ecology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2015

Marie Højlund  and
Morten Riis
Marie Højlund*
Affiliation:
Department of Aesthetics and Communication, Aarhus University, Helsingforsgade 14, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Morten Riis*
Affiliation:
Centre for Participatory IT, Department of Aesthetics and Communication, Aarhus University, Helsingforsgade 14, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
*
Email: musmkh@dac.au.dk
Email: riis.morten@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we offer an object-oriented ontological perspective to complement the diversity of sounding ontologies, challenging the human perspective as the only valid perspective and call for the necessity of including perspectives of objects such as a speakers, voices and light sensors. Subscribing to this view also confronts music and sound art as consistent autonomous categories and focuses on how the pieces attune to the environment, emphasising meetings, transformations and translations through and with other objects. These meetings generate an ecological awareness of causal aesthetics where objects time and space each other. This contrasts with traditional analysis of music and sound art, which is based on the assumption that time and space are containers in which sound and music unfold. We analyse two contemporary pieces by the authors in an attempt to unfold a dark ecological1 approach to test the implications, limits and potentials for future use and development.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 20 , Special Issue 2: Sound Art and Music, Historical Continuum and Mimetic Fissures , August 2015 , pp. 249 - 262
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acts. 2014. ACTS Festival. www.samtidskunst.dk/en/exhibitions/acts (accessed 21 August 2014).Google Scholar
Bailes, F. and Dean, R. T. 2012. Comparative Time Series Analysis of Perceptual Responses to Electroacoustic Music. Music Perception 29(4): 359.Google Scholar
Benestad, F. 1977. Musikk og tanke: Hovedretninger i musikkestetikkens historie fra antikken til vår egen tid. Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, D. M. 2012. The Uses of Object-Oriented Ontology. http://stunlaw.blogspot.no/2012/05/uses-of-object-oriented-ontology.html (accessed 2 December 2014).Google Scholar
Bogost, I. 2012. Alien Phenomenology, or, What it’s Like to be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, G. 2010. For a Relational Musicology: Music and Interdisciplinarity, Beyond the Practice Turn. Journal of the Royal Musical Association 135(2): 205–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, L. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanitites Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, P. 1994. Permanent Magnet Materials and their Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesarale, G. 2014. The ‘not’ of Speculative Realism. www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/‘not’-speculative-realism (accessed 2 December 2014).Google Scholar
Christensen, I. 1962. Lys: Digte. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. F. 2005. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to The Perception of Musical Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, A. 2013. The Call of Things: A Critique of Object-Oriented Ontologies. Minnesota Review 2013(80): 106–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. 2011. Beyond Representation and Signification: Toward a Sonic Materialism. Journal of Visual Culture 10(2): 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, R. T and Bailes, F. 2010. Time Series Analysis as a Method to Examine Acoustical Influences on Real-time Perception in Music. Empirical Musicology Review 5(4): 152–175.Google Scholar
Galloway, A. 2010. French Theory Today – An Introduction to Possible Futures. New York: TPSNY/Erudio Editions.Google Scholar
Galloway, A. 2012. A Response to Graham Harman’s ‘Marginalia on Radical Thinking’. http://itself.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/a-response-to-graham-harmans-marginalia-on-radical-thinking/ (accessed 2 December 2014).Google Scholar
Gonsales, E. 2011. The Difference Between Music and ‘Sound Art’: Q&A with Marcelo Armani. http://thecreatorsproject.vice.com/blog/the-difference-between-music-and-sound-art-qa-with-marcelo-armani (accessed 20 August 2014).Google Scholar
Harley, M. A. 1996. Notes On Music Ecology: As a New Research Paradigm. www.wfae.proscenia.net/library/articles/harly_paradigm.pdf (accessed 11 December 2014).Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2002. Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. Peru, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2010a. brief SR/OOO tutorial. http://doctorzamalek2.wordpress.com/2010/07/23/brief-srooo-tutorial/ (accessed 25 June 2014).Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2010b. Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures. Hants, UK: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2011. The Quadruple Object. Winchester: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2012. On Vicarious Causation. Collapse 2: 187–221.Google Scholar
Højlund, M. 2011a. Flow of Voice Recordings. www.lysogstemmer.dk/?page_id=435 (accessed 15 September 2014).Google Scholar
Højlund, M. 2011b. Lys og Stemmer. www.lysogstemmer.dk (accessed 15 September 2014).Google Scholar
Højlund, M. 2011c. Recording in the Caravan. http://vimeo.com/24911427 (accessed 15 September 2014).Google Scholar
Højlund, M. 2014a. Lys Chorus. www.soundcloud.com/marybell/1-lys-chorus (accessed 15 September 2014).Google Scholar
Højlund, M. 2014b. Lys Delay. www.soundcloud.com/marybell/1-lys-delay (accessed 15 September 2014).Google Scholar
Højlund, M. 2014c. Lys Repeat. www.soundcloud.com/marybell/1-lys-repeat (accessed 15 September 2014).Google Scholar
Jackson, R. 2011. The Anxiousness of Objects and Artworks: Michael Fried, Object Oriented Ontology and Aesthetic Absorption. Speculations (II): 135–168.Google Scholar
Kane, B. 2013. Musicophobia, or Sound Art and the Demands of Art Theory. Nonsite.org (8).Google Scholar
Kassabian, A. 2013. Ubiquitous Listening: Affect, Attention, and Distributed Subjectivity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Khare, P. and Swarup, A. 2009. Engineering Physics: Fundamentals & Modern Applications. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
Kim-Cohen, S. 2009. In the Blink of an Ear: Toward a Non-cochlear Sonic Art. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kotz, L. 2001. Post-Cagean Aesthetics and the “Event” Score. October 95: 55–89.Google Scholar
Methi, H. 2014. Dark Ecology. www.darkecology.net (accessed 12 December 2014).Google Scholar
Morton, T. 2007. Ecology Without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morton, T. 2010. The Ecological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morton, T. 2011. Objects as Temporary Autonomous Zones. Continent 1(3): 149–155.Google Scholar
Morton, T. 2012a. Art in the Age of Asymmetry: Hegel, Objects, Aesthetics. Evental Aesthetics 1(1): 121–142.Google Scholar
Morton, T. 2012b. Everything We Need: Scarcity, Scale, Hyperobjects. Architectural Design 82(4): 78–81.Google Scholar
Morton, T. 2012c. An Object-Oriented Defense of Poetry. New Literary History 43(2): 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, T. 2013a. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Morton, T. 2013b. Realist Magic: Objects, Ontology, Causality. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1974. What is it Like to be a Bat? The Philosophical Review 83(4): 435–450.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, C. O. 2007. The Musical Representation – Meaning, Ontology, and Emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, M. T. 2006. Expectation in Melody: The Influence of Context and Learning. Music Perception 23(5): 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, C. and Spruce, G. 2012. Debates in Music Teaching. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Riis, M. 2014. Opaque Sounding. www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzybYC5nqJM (accessed 9 September 2014).Google Scholar
Schmidt, U. 2013. Det ambiente: sansning, medialisering, omgivelse. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, C. 2013. Performing Objects. http://performingobjectsconference.co.uk (accessed 10 December 2014).Google Scholar
Sinclair, I. 2001. Sensors and Transducers. Oxford: Newnes.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1986. Spectro-morphology and Structuring Processes. In S. Emmerson (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Spor. 2014. SPOR Festival. www.sporfestival.dk (accessed 21 August 2014).Google Scholar
Sterne, J. 2005. The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sterne, J. 2012. The Sound Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tarasti, E. 1995. Musical Signification: Essays in the Semiotic Theory and Analysis of Music. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thoresen, L. and Hedman, A. 2007. Spectromorphological Analysis of Sound Objects: An Adaptation of Pierre Schaeffer's Typomorphology. Organised Sound 12(2): 129–141.Google Scholar
Thorne, C. 2012. To the Political Ontologists. http://sites.williams.edu/cthorne/articles/to-the-political-ontologists/ (accessed 2 December 2014).Google Scholar
Vandsø, A. 2015. Music, Sound Art and Context in a Post-Cagean Era. http://seismograf.org/node/6605 (accessed 24 February 2015).Google Scholar
Voegelin, S. 2010. Listening to Noise and Silence: Towards a Philosophy of Sound Art. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Whitehead, M. 2014. Environmental Transformations: A Geography of the Anthropocene. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wishart, T. 1977. Musical Writing, Musical Speaking. In J. Shepherd (ed.) Whose Music? A Sociology of Musical Languages. London: Transactions Books.Google Scholar
Wishart, T. and Emmerson, S. 1996. On Sonic Art. Amsterdam Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Yahoo 2014. Music vs. ‘Sound Art’? https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100225002047AAb6yGA (accessed 20 August 2014).Google Scholar
Young, L. M. 1987. The Well-Tuned Piano: 81 X 25 6:17:50–11:18:59 PM NYC. US: Gramavision.Google Scholar
Zbikowski, L. M. 2005. Conceptualizing Music: Cognitive Structure, Theory, and Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar