Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: reframing nature to save it

  • Evangelia Apostolopoulou (a1) and William M. Adams (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Biodiversity offsetting involves the balancing of biodiversity loss in one place (and at one time) by an equivalent biodiversity gain elsewhere (an outcome referred to as No Net Loss). The conservation science literature has chiefly addressed the extent to which biodiversity offsets can serve as a conservation tool, focusing on the technical challenges of its implementation. However, offsetting has more profound implications than this technical approach suggests. In this paper we introduce the concept of policy frames, and use it to identify four ways in which non-human nature and its conservation are reframed by offsetting. Firstly, offsetting reframes nature in terms of isolated biodiversity units that can be simply defined, measured and exchanged across time and space to achieve equivalence between ecological losses and gains. Secondly, it reframes biodiversity as lacking locational specificity, ignoring broader dimensions of place and deepening a nature–culture and nature–society divide. Thirdly, it reframes conservation as an exchange of credits implying that the value of non-human nature can be set by price. Fourthly, it ties conservation to land development and economic growth, foreshadowing and bypassing an oppositional position. We conclude that by presenting offsetting as a technical issue, the problem of biodiversity loss due to development is depoliticized. As a result the possibility of opposing and challenging environmental destruction is foreclosed, and a dystopian future of continued biodiversity loss is presented as the only alternative.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: reframing nature to save it
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: reframing nature to save it
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: reframing nature to save it
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail ea367@cam.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

E. Apostolopoulou & W.M. Adams (2015) Neoliberal capitalism and conservation in the post-crisis era: the dialectics of ‘green’ and ‘un-green’ grabbing in Greece and the UK. Antipode, 47, 1535.

E. Apostolopoulou , D. Bormpoudakis , R. Paloniemi , J. Cent , M. Grodzińska-Jurczak , A. Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska & J.D. Pantis (2014) Governance rescaling and the neoliberalization of nature: the case of biodiversity conservation in four EU countries. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21, 481494.

E. Apostolopoulou & R. Paloniemi (2012) Frames of scale challenges in Finnish and Greek biodiversity conservation. Ecology and Society, 17, 9.

S. Benabou (2014) Making up for lost nature? A critical review of the international development of voluntary biodiversity offsets. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 5, 103123.

L. Boitani , G.M. Mace & C. Rondinini (2015) Challenging the scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. Conservation Letters, 8, 125131.

J.W. Bull , K.B. Suttle , A. Gordon , N.J. Singh & E.J. Milner-Gulland (2013) Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice. Oryx, 47, 369380.

A.G. Bumpus & D.M. Liverman (2008) Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets. Economic Geography, 84, 127155.

B. Büscher , S. Sullivan , K. Neves , J. Igoe & D. Brockington (2012) Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 23, 430.

P.J. Comer , R.L. Pressey , M.L. Hunter Jr, C.A. Schloss , S.C. Buttrick , N.E. Heller (2015) Incorporating geodiversity into conservation decisions. Conservation Biology, 29, 692701.

R.M. Entman (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 5158.

T.A. Gardner , A. von Hase , S. Brownlie , J.M.M. Ekstrom , J.D. Pilgrim , C.E. Savy (2013) Biodiversity offsets and the challenge of achieving no net loss. Conservation Biology, 27, 12541264.

A. Gordon , J.W. Bull , C. Wilcox & M. Maron (2015) Perverse incentives risk undermining biodiversity offset policies. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 532537.

C.I. Kettlewell , V. Bouchard , D. Porej , M. Micacchion , J.J. Mack , D. White & L. Fay (2008) An assessment of wetland impacts and compensatory mitigation in the Cuyahoga River Watershed, Ohio, USA. Wetlands, 28, 5767.

G. Lakoff (2010) Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4, 7081.

R. Levins & R. Lewontin (1980) Dialectics and reductionism in ecology. Synthese, 43, 4778.

M. Maron , R.J. Hobbs , A. Moilanen , J.W. Matthews , K. Christie , T.A. Gardner et al. (2012) Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biological Conservation, 155, 141148.

M.H. Menz , K.W. Dixon & R.J. Hobbs (2013) Hurdles and opportunities for landscape-scale restoration. Science, 339, 526527.

R. Muradian & L. Rival (2012) Between markets and hierarchies: the challenge of governing ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 1, 93100.

F. Quétier & S. Lavorel (2011) Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: key issues and solutions. Biological Conservation, 144, 29912999.

M.M. Robertson (2000) No net noss: wetland restoration and the incomplete capitalization of nature. Antipode, 32, 463493.

M.M. Robertson (2004) The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum, 35, 361373.

M.M. Robertson (2006) The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 367387.

M.M. Robertson (2012) Measurement and alienation: making a world of ecosystem services. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 386401.

C. Seagle (2012) Inverting the impacts: mining, conservation and sustainability claims near the Rio Tinto/QMM ilmenite mine in Southeast Madagascar. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39, 447477.

N. Smith (2010) Uneven Development, 3rd edition. Verso, New York, USA.

P. Sukhdev , H. Wittmer & D. Miller (2014) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): challenges and responses. In Nature in the Balance: The Economics of Biodiversity (eds D. Helm & C. Hepburn ), pp. 135152. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

S. Sullivan (2013b) Banking nature? The spectacular financialisation of environmental conservation. Antipode, 45, 198217.

S. Walker , A.L. Brower , R.T. Stephens & W.G. Lee (2009) Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conservation Letters, 2, 149157.

J. Wilson & E. Swyngedouw (2014) Seeds of dystopia: post-politics and the return of the political. In The Post-Political and its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics (eds J. Wilson & E. Swyngedouw ), pp. 122. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 32
Total number of PDF views: 432 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 406 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.