Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Genetics and the last stand of the Sumatran rhinoceros Dicerorhinus sumatrensis

  • Benoît Goossens (a1), Milena Salgado-Lynn (a1), Jeffrine J. Rovie-Ryan (a2), Abdul H. Ahmad (a3), Junaidi Payne (a4), Zainal Z. Zainuddin (a4), Senthilvel K. S. S. Nathan (a5) and Laurentius N. Ambu (a5)...
Abstract
Abstract

The Sumatran rhinoceros Dicerorhinus sumatrensis is on the brink of extinction. Although habitat loss and poaching were the reasons of the decline, today's reproductive isolation is the main threat to the survival of the species. Genetic studies have played an important role in identifying conservation priorities, including for rhinoceroses. However, for a species such as the Sumatran rhinoceros, where time is of the essence in preventing extinction, to what extent should genetic and geographical distances be taken into account in deciding the most urgently needed conservation interventions? We propose that the populations of Sumatra and Borneo be considered as a single management unit.

Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail goossensbr@cardiff.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


G. Amato , D. Wharton , Z.Z. Zainuddin & J.R. Powell (1995) Assessment of conservation units for the Sumatran rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis). Zoo Biology, 14, 395402.

M.V. Ashley , D.J. Melnick & D. Western (1990) Conservation genetics of the black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), I: evidence from the mitochondrial DNA of three populations. Conservation Biology, 4, 7177.

J.W.O. Ballard & D.M. Rand (2005) The population biology of mitochondrial DNA and its phylogenetic implications. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36, 621642.

J.L.Bouzat , J.A.Johnson , J.E.Toepfer , S.A.Simpson , T.L.Esker & R.L.Westemeier (2008) Beyond the beneficial effects of translocations as an effective tool for the genetic restoration of isolated populations. Conservation Genetics, 10, 191201.

A. Caballero , S.T. Rodríguez-Ramilo , V. Ávila & J. Fernández (2009) Management of genetic diversity of subdivided populations in conservation programmes. Conservation Genetics, 11, 409419.

E.Cerdeño (1998) Diversity and evolutionary trends of the family Rhinocerotidae (Perissodactyla). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 141, 1334.

P. Crnokrak & D.A. Roff (1999) Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity, 83, 260270.

R. DeSalle & G. Amato (2004) The expansion of conservation genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 702712.

E.Dinerstein (2003) The Return of the Unicorns: The Natural History and Conservation of the Greater One-Horned Rhinoceros. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.

E.Dinerstein & G.F.McCracken (1990) Endangered greater one-horned rhinoceros carry high levels of genetic variation. Conservation Biology, 4, 417422.

P.Fernando , G.Polet , N.Foead , L.S.Ng , J.Pastorini & D.J.Melnick (2006) Genetic diversity, phylogeny and conservation of the Javan rhinoceros (Rhinoceros sondaicus). Conservation Genetics, 7, 439448.

J.Fickel , A.Wagener & A.Ludwig (2007) Semen cryopreservation and the conservation of endangered species. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 53, 8189.

R.Frankham (2009) Where are we in conservation genetics and where do we need to go? Conservation Genetics, 11, 661663.

R.Frankham , J.D.Ballou & D.A.Briscoe (2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

C.P.Groves , P.Fernando & J.Robovský (2010) The sixth rhino: a taxonomic re-assessment of the Critically Endangered northern white rhinoceros. PLOS ONE, 5, e9703.

E.H.Harley , I.Baumgarten , J.Cunningham & C.O'Ryan (2005) Genetic variation and population structure in remnant populations of black rhinoceros, Diceros bicornis, in Africa. Molecular Ecology, 14, 29812990.

P.W.Hedrick (1995) Gene flow and genetic restoration: the Florida panther as a case study. Conservation Biology, 9, 9961007.

P.W. Hedrick (2005) ‘Genetic restoration:’ a more comprehensive perspective than ‘genetic rescue’. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 109.

P.W.Hedrick & R.Fredrickson (2009) Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers. Conservation Genetics, 11, 615626.

R. Hermes , F. Göritz , J. Saragusty , E. Sós , V. Molnar , C.E. Reid (2009) First successful artificial insemination with frozen-thawed semen in rhinoceros. Theriogenology, 71, 393399.

T.B. Hildebrandt , R. Hermes , C. Walzer , E. Sós , V. Molnar , L. Mezösi (2007) Artificial insemination in the anoestrous and the postpartum white rhinoceros using GnRH analogue to induce ovulation. Theriogenology, 67, 14731484.

J.T.Hogg , S.H.Forbes , B.M.Steele & G.Luikart (2006) Genetic rescue of an insular population of large mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 273, 14911499.

W.V.Holt & A.R.Pickard (1999) Role of reproductive technologies and genetic resource banks in animal conservation. Reviews of Reproduction, 4, 143150.

G.D.D. Hurst & F.M. Jiggins (2005) Problems with mitochondrial DNA as a marker in population, phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies: the effects of inherited symbionts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 15251534.

W.E. Johnson , D.P. Onorato , M.E. Roelke , E.D. Land , M. Cunningham , R.C. Belden (2010) Genetic restoration of the Florida panther. Science, 329, 16411645.

L. Johnston & R. Lacy (1995) Genome resource banking for species conservation: selection of sperm donors. Cryobiology, 32, 6877.

L. Laikre (2010) Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementation. Conservation Genetics, 11, 349354.

J.C. Morales , P.M. Andau , J. Supriatna , Z,Z. Zainuddin & D.J. Melnick (1997) Mitochondrial DNA variability and conservation genetics of the Sumatran rhinoceros. Conservation Biology, 11, 539543.

C. Moritz (1994) Defining ‘Evolutionarily Significant Units’ for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9, 373375.

C.Moritz (2002) Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Systematic Biology, 51, 238254.

M. Nei (1972) Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist, 106, 283292.

L. Orlando , J.A. Leonard , A. Thenot , V. Laudet , C. Guerin & C. Hänni (2003) Ancient DNA analysis reveals woolly rhino evolutionary relationships. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 28, 485499.

A.Rabinowitz (1995) Helping a species go extinct: the Sumatran rhino in Borneo. Conservation Biology, 9, 482488.

D. Rubinoff & B. Holland (2005) Between two extremes: mitochondrial DNA is neither the panacea nor the nemesis of phylogenetic and taxonomic inference. Systematic Biology, 54, 952961.

O. Ryder (1986) Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1, 910.

D.A. Tallmon , G. Luikart & R.S. Waples (2004) The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 489496.

C.Tougard , T.Delefosse , C.Hänni & C.Montgelard (2001) Phylogenetic relationships of the five extant Rhinoceros species (Rhinocerotidae, Perissodactyla) based on mitochondrial cytochrome b and 12S rRNA genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 19, 3444.

J.J.Wiens , C.A.Kuczynski & P.R.Stephens (2010) Discordant mitochondrial and nuclear gene phylogenies in emydid turtles: implications for speciation and conservation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 99, 445461.

E. Willerslev , M.T.P. Gilbert , J. Binladen , S.Y.W. Ho , P.F. Campos , A. Ratan (2009) Analysis of complete mitochondrial genomes from extinct and extant rhinoceroses reveals lack of phylogenetic resolution. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9, 95.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: