Cherry, Seth G. Derocher, Andrew E. and Lunn, Nicholas J. 2016. Habitat-mediated timing of migration in polar bears: an individual perspective. Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 6, Issue. 14, p. 5032.
Galicia, Melissa P. Thiemann, Gregory W. Dyck, Markus G. Ferguson, Steven H. and Higdon, Jeff W. 2016. Dietary habits of polar bears in Foxe Basin, Canada: possible evidence of a trophic regime shift mediated by a new top predator. Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 6, Issue. 16, p. 6005.
Malenfant, René M. Davis, Corey S. Cullingham, Catherine I. Coltman, David W. and Janke, Axel 2016. Circumpolar Genetic Structure and Recent Gene Flow of Polar Bears: A Reanalysis. PLOS ONE, Vol. 11, Issue. 3, p. e0148967.
Yannic, Glenn St-Laurent, Martin-Hugues Ortego, Joaquin Taillon, Joëlle Beauchemin, Alexandre Bernatchez, Louis Dussault, Christian and Côté, Steeve D. 2016. Integrating ecological and genetic structure to define management units for caribou in Eastern Canada. Conservation Genetics, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 437.
Galicia, Melissa P. Thiemann, Gregory W. Dyck, Markus G. and Ferguson, Steven H. 2015. Characterization of polar bear (Ursus maritimus) diets in the Canadian High Arctic. Polar Biology, Vol. 38, Issue. 12, p. 1983.
Peacock, Elizabeth Sonsthagen, Sarah A. Obbard, Martyn E. Boltunov, Andrei Regehr, Eric V. Ovsyanikov, Nikita Aars, Jon Atkinson, Stephen N. Sage, George K. Hope, Andrew G. Zeyl, Eve Bachmann, Lutz Ehrich, Dorothee Scribner, Kim T. Amstrup, Steven C. Belikov, Stanislav Born, Erik W. Derocher, Andrew E. Stirling, Ian Taylor, Mitchell K. Wiig, Øystein Paetkau, David Talbot, Sandra L. and Knapp, Michael 2015. Implications of the Circumpolar Genetic Structure of Polar Bears for Their Conservation in a Rapidly Warming Arctic. PLoS ONE, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. e112021.
Elvin, Sandra S. 2014. The large marine ecosystem approach to assessment and management of polar bears during climate change. Environmental Development, Vol. 11, p. 67.
Castro de la Guardia, Laura Derocher, Andrew E. Myers, Paul G. Terwisscha van Scheltinga, Arjen D. and Lunn, Nick J. 2013. Future sea ice conditions in Western Hudson Bay and consequences for polar bears in the 21st century. Global Change Biology, Vol. 19, Issue. 9, p. 2675.
De Groot, Peter Van Coeverden Wong, Pamela B. Y. Harris, Christopher Dyck, Markus G. Kamookak, Louie Pagès, Marie Michaux, Johan and Boag, Peter T. 2013. Toward a non-invasive inuit polar bear survey: Genetic data from polar bear hair snags. Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 394.
Weber, D. S. Van Coeverden De Groot, P. J. Peacock, E. Schrenzel, M. D. Perez, D. A. Thomas, S. Shelton, J. M. Else, C. K. Darby, L. L. Acosta, L. Harris, C. Youngblood, J. Boag, P. and Desalle, R. 2013. Low MHC variation in the polar bear: implications in the face of Arctic warming?. Animal Conservation, Vol. 16, Issue. 6, p. 671.
Macbeth, Bryan J. Cattet, Marc R. L. Obbard, Martyn E. Middel, Kevin and Janz, David M. 2012. Evaluation of hair cortisol concentration as a biomarker of long-term stress in free-ranging polar bears. Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 36, Issue. 4, p. 747.
Proctor, Michael F. Paetkau, David Mclellan, Bruce N. Stenhouse, Gordon B. Kendall, Katherine C. Mace, Richard D. Kasworm, Wayne F. Servheen, Christopher Lausen, Cori L. Gibeau, Michael L. Wakkinen, Wayne L. Haroldson, Mark A. Mowat, Garth Apps, Clayton D. Ciarniello, Lana M. Barclay, Robert M. R. Boyce, Mark S. Schwartz, Charles C. and Strobeck, Curtis 2012. Population fragmentation and inter-ecosystem movements of grizzly bears in western Canada and the northern United States. Wildlife Monographs, Vol. 180, Issue. 1, p. 1.
Vongraven, Dag Aars, Jon Amstrup, Steve Atkinson, Stephen N. Belikov, Stanislav Born, Erik W. DeBruyn, Terry D. Derocher, Andrew E. Durner, George Gill, Mike Lunn, Nick Obbard, Martyn E. Omelak, Jack Ovsyanikov, Nikita Peacock, Elizabeth Richardson, Evan Sahanatien, Vicki Stirling, Ian and Wiig, Øystein 2012. A circumpolar monitoring framework for polar bears. Ursus, Vol. 23, Issue. sp2, p. 1.
Waite, Jason N. Trumble, Stephen J. Burkanov, Vladimir N. and Andrews, Russel D. 2012. Resource partitioning by sympatric Steller sea lions and northern fur seals as revealed by biochemical dietary analyses and satellite telemetry. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, Vol. 416-417, p. 41.
Meek, Chanda L. 2011. Putting the US polar bear debate into context: The disconnect between old policy and new problems. Marine Policy, Vol. 35, Issue. 4, p. 430.
Meek, Chanda L. Lauren Lovecraft, Amy Varjopuro, Riku Dowsley, Martha and Dale, Aaron T. 2011. Adaptive governance and the human dimensions of marine mammal management: Implications for policy in a changing North. Marine Policy, Vol. 35, Issue. 4, p. 466.
Peacock, E. Derocher, A.E. Thiemann, G.W. and Stirling, I. 2011. Conservation and management of Canada’s polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in a changing Arctic11This review is part of the virtual symposium “Flagship Species – Flagship Problems” that deals with ecology, biodiversity and management issues, and climate impacts on species at risk and of Canadian importance, including the polar bear (Ursus maritimus), Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus), and caribou (Rangifer tarandus).. Canadian Journal of Zoology, Vol. 89, Issue. 5, p. 371.
Stirling, Ian McDonald, Trent L. Richardson, E. S. Regehr, Eric V. and Amstrup, Steven C. 2011. Polar bear population status in the northern Beaufort Sea, Canada, 1971–2006. Ecological Applications, Vol. 21, Issue. 3, p. 859.
Wenzel, George W. 2011. Polar bear management, sport hunting and Inuit subsistence at Clyde River, Nunavut. Marine Policy, Vol. 35, Issue. 4, p. 457.
Amstrup, Steven C. DeWeaver, Eric T. Douglas, David C. Marcot, Bruce G. Durner, George M. Bitz, Cecilia M. and Bailey, David A. 2010. Greenhouse gas mitigation can reduce sea-ice loss and increase polar bear persistence. Nature, Vol. 468, Issue. 7326, p. 955.
Polar bears Ursus maritimus have a circumpolar distribution that is directly tied to the Arctic sea ice. Although they are wide-ranging, polar bears do not belong to a single population but rather are comprised of 19 largely discrete subpopulations, 13 of which are fully or partly under Canadian jurisdiction. These subpopulations are used to manage the sustainable harvest of polar bears in Canada but for conservation purposes the species is currently considered a single biological unit. Long-term climate warming has reduced the availability of sea ice that polar bears require for feeding, movement and reproduction, and continued declines in ice extent and duration are forecast to have significant negative effects on polar bears in some areas. Under the Canadian Species at Risk Act separate legal protection may be given to intraspecific groups (so called designatable units, DUs) that are genetically, geographically and/or biogeographically distinct. We examined the conservation status of polar bears across their Canadian range and compared large-scale ecosystem properties across subpopulations. We found that threats to the conservation of polar bears are not spatially uniform and we identified five DUs that captured broad patterns of polar bear biodiversity. We conclude that the use of DUs provides a biologically-sound framework for the conservation of polar bears.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.