Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Inefficiency in the fight against wildlife crime in Brazil

  • Ednaldo Monteiro da Silva (a1) and Enrico Bernard (a1)

Brazil's biodiversity faces significant threats, including wildlife crime. Although wildlife is protected by law and there are enforcement agencies to administer penalties and impose fines, the effectiveness of this system is questionable. Tackling wildlife crime requires legislation aligned with well-structured mechanisms for surveillance and de facto punishment. We used data on notifications of violations and payment of fines associated with wildlife crime in the state of Pernambuco over 12 years as a proxy for efficiency in tackling wildlife crime in Brazil. We tracked 803 processes from 2000–2012, extracting data on the type of violation, the fine imposed, the length of process handling, and processing and payment status. The number of processes rose from 17 in 2004 to 167 in 2012, with 69% of cases occurring during 2008–2012. Only 37.6% of processes were concluded, with completion times of 286–4,558 days. Some processes had been open for 11.5 years. Fines totalling > USD 22 million were issued but only c. 1% of this amount was paid. Small fines are often pardoned or converted to a warning. Although enforcement has improved it is still inefficient, with errors in notification and data entry, a lengthy judicial process, and an inability to recover unpaid fines.

Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R.R.N. Alves & G.A. Pereira Filho (2007) Commercialization and use of snakes in north and northeastern Brazil: implications for conservation and management. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 969985.

R.R.N. Alves & I.L. Rosa (2010) Trade of animals used in Brazilian traditional medicine: trends and implications for conservation. Human Ecology, 38, 691704.

E. Bernard , L.A.O. Penna & E. Araújo (2014) Downgrading, downsizing, degazettement, and reclassification of protected areas in Brazil. Conservation Biology, 28, 939950.

A.G. Bruner , R.E. Gullison & A. Balmford (2004) Financial costs and shortfalls of managing and expanding protected-area systems in developing countries. BioScience, 54, 11191126.

M.B. Gordon , J.R. Iglesias , V. Semeshenko & J.P. Nadal (2009) Crime and punishment: the economic burden of impunity. The European Physical Journal B, 68, 133–144.

V.V. Kuhnen & V.T. Kanaan (2014) Wildlife trade in Brazil: a closer look at wild pets welfare issues. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 74, 124127.

D.P. McCarthy , P.F. Donald , J.P.W. Scharlemann , G.M. Buchanan , A. Balmford , J.M.H. Green (2012) Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: current spending and unmet needs. Science, 338, 946949.

R.F.S. Regueira & E. Bernard (2012) Wildlife sinks: quantifying the impact of illegal bird trade in street markets in Brazil. Biological Conservation, 149, 1622.

S. Schwartzman , P. Moutinho & S. Hamburg (2012) Amazon deforestation and Brazil's forest code: a crossroads for climate change. Carbon Management, 3, 341343.

R.J. Smith , R.D.J. Muir , M.J. Walpole , A. Balmford & N. Leader-Williams (2003) Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature, 426, 6770.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 47 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 217 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.