Skip to main content
×
Home

Inefficiency in the fight against wildlife crime in Brazil

  • Ednaldo Monteiro da Silva (a1) and Enrico Bernard (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Brazil's biodiversity faces significant threats, including wildlife crime. Although wildlife is protected by law and there are enforcement agencies to administer penalties and impose fines, the effectiveness of this system is questionable. Tackling wildlife crime requires legislation aligned with well-structured mechanisms for surveillance and de facto punishment. We used data on notifications of violations and payment of fines associated with wildlife crime in the state of Pernambuco over 12 years as a proxy for efficiency in tackling wildlife crime in Brazil. We tracked 803 processes from 2000–2012, extracting data on the type of violation, the fine imposed, the length of process handling, and processing and payment status. The number of processes rose from 17 in 2004 to 167 in 2012, with 69% of cases occurring during 2008–2012. Only 37.6% of processes were concluded, with completion times of 286–4,558 days. Some processes had been open for 11.5 years. Fines totalling > USD 22 million were issued but only c. 1% of this amount was paid. Small fines are often pardoned or converted to a warning. Although enforcement has improved it is still inefficient, with errors in notification and data entry, a lengthy judicial process, and an inability to recover unpaid fines.

Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail enrico.bernard@ufpe.br
References
Hide All
Alves R.R.N., Lima J.R.F. & Araújo H.F.P. (2013) The live bird trade in Brazil and its conservation implications: an overview. Bird Conservation International, 23, 5365.
Alves R.R.N. & Pereira Filho G.A. (2007) Commercialization and use of snakes in north and northeastern Brazil: implications for conservation and management. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 969985.
Alves R.R.N. & Rosa I.L. (2010) Trade of animals used in Brazilian traditional medicine: trends and implications for conservation. Human Ecology, 38, 691704.
Barreto P., Araújo E. & Brito B. (2009a) A impunidade de crimes ambientais em áreas protegidas federais na Amazônia. Imazon, Belém, Brazil.
Barreto P. & Mesquita M. (2009) Como prevenir e punir infrações ambientais em áreas protegidas na Amazônia? Imazon, Belém, Brazil.
Barreto P., Mesquita M., Araújo E. & Brito B. (2009b) A impunidade de infratores ambientais em áreas protegidas da Amazônia. Imazon, Belém, Brazil.
Bennett W.F. (2012) Where the wild things were. Http://100r.org/2012/11/where-the-wild-things-were/ [accessed 8 September 2014].
Bernard E., Penna L.A.O. & Araújo E. (2014) Downgrading, downsizing, degazettement, and reclassification of protected areas in Brazil. Conservation Biology, 28, 939950.
Brito B. (2009) Multas Pós-Operação Curupira no Mato Grosso. Imazon, Belém, Brazil.
Brito B. & Barreto P. (2005) Desafios da Lei de Crimes Ambientais no Pará. Imazon, Belém, Brazil.
Brito B. & Barreto P. (2006) A eficácia da aplicação da lei de crimes ambientais pelo Ibama para proteção de florestas no Pará. Revista de Direito Ambiental, 32, 3565.
Bruner A.G., Gullison R.E. & Balmford A. (2004) Financial costs and shortfalls of managing and expanding protected-area systems in developing countries. BioScience, 54, 11191126.
Clark N. (2011) Ibama pretende desativar unidades regionais no país. Http://www.oeco.org.br/noticias/25203-ibama-pretende-desativar-unidades-regionais-no-pais [accessed 8 September 2014].
CNJ (Conselho Nacional de Justiça) (2013) Justiça em números 2013: ano-base 2012. Http://www.cnj.jus.br/images/pesquisas-judiciarias/Publicacoes/relatorio_jn2013.pdf [accessed 8 September 2014].
Farias E. (2011) Municípios do Amazonas ficam desassistidos com fechamento de unidades do Ibama. Http://acritica.uol.com.br/amazonia/Amazonia-Amazonas-Manaus-Municipios-Amazonas-desassistidos-fechamento-Ibama_0_593340995.html [accessed 8 September 2014].
Gordon M.B., Iglesias J.R., Semeshenko V. & Nadal J.P. (2009) Crime and punishment: the economic burden of impunity. The European Physical Journal B, 68, 133–144.
Hanson J.H. & McNair D. (2014) Should conservationists continue to dodge the issue of tax dodging? Oryx, 48, 313314.
IBAMA (Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis) (2009) Instrução Normativa no 14, de 15 de maio de 2009. Http://www.ibama.gov.br/category/1?download=58%3A14-2009-p-27-2009&start=40 [accessed 8 September 2014].
IBAMA (Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis) (2012) Relatório de Gestão do Exercício de 2011. Http://www.ibama.gov.br/phocadownload/acesso_a_informacao/ibama_relatorio_de_gestao_2011.pdf [accessed 8 September 2014].
IBAMA (Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis) (2013) Implementação do Auto de Infração Eletrônico—AI-e. Http://www.ibama.gov.br/publicadas/implementacao-do-auto-de-infracao-eletronico-%E2%80%93-ai-e [accessed 8 September 2014].
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e estatística) (2014) Estados@ Pernambuco. Http://www.ibge.gov.br/estadosat/perfil.php?sigla=pe [accessed 3 December 2014].
Jepson P. & Ladle R.J. (2005) Bird-keeping in Indonesia: conservation impacts and the potential for substitution-based conservation responses. Oryx, 39, 442448.
Jepson P. & Ladle R.J. (2009) Governing bird-keeping in Java and Bali: evidence from a household survey. Oryx, 43, 364374.
Kuhnen V.V. & Kanaan V.T. (2014) Wildlife trade in Brazil: a closer look at wild pets welfare issues. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 74, 124127.
McCarthy D.P., Donald P.F., Scharlemann J.P.W., Buchanan G.M., Balmford A., Green J.M.H. et al. (2012) Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: current spending and unmet needs. Science, 338, 946949.
Menezes D. & Chagas P.V. (2012) Meio Ambiente: 27% do orçamento é “contingenciado”. Http://www.contasabertas.com.br/website/arquivos/1101 [accessed 8 September 2014].
Novaes R.L.M. & Souza R.F. (2013) Legalizing environmental exploitation in Brazil: the retreat of public policies for biodiversity protection. Tropical Conservation Science, 6, 477483.
Pereira G.A. & Brito M.T. (2005) Diversidade de aves silvestres brasileiras comercializadas nas feiras livres da Região Metropolitana do Recife, Pernambuco. Http://www.ao.com.br/download/glauco.pdf [accessed 8 September 2014].
Presidência da República do Brasil (1988) Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/Constituicao.htm [accessed 3 November 2014].
Presidência da República do Brasil (1998) Lei no 9.605, de 12 de fevereiro de 1998. Http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9605.htm [accessed 8 September 2014].
Presidência da República do Brasil (2008) Decreto no 6.514 de 22 de julho de 2008. Http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2008/decreto/D6514.htm [accessed 8 September 2014].
Presidência da República do Brasil (2011a) Lei Complementar no 140, de 8 de dezembro de 2011. Http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/lcp/Lcp140.htm [accessed 8 September 2014].
Presidência da República do Brasil (2011b) Lei no 12.527, de 18 de novembro de 2011. Http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/lei/l12527.htm [accessed 8 September 2014].
Regueira R.F.S. & Bernard E. (2012) Wildlife sinks: quantifying the impact of illegal bird trade in street markets in Brazil. Biological Conservation, 149, 1622.
RENCTAS (Rede Nacional de Combate ao Tráfico de Animais Silvestres) (2001) 1° Relatório Nacional sobre o Tráfico de Fauna Silvestre. Http://www.renctas.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/REL_RENCTAS_pt_final.pdf [accessed 8 September 2014].
Schwartzman S., Moutinho P. & Hamburg S. (2012) Amazon deforestation and Brazil's forest code: a crossroads for climate change. Carbon Management, 3, 341343.
Smith R.J., Muir R.D.J., Walpole M.J., Balmford A. & Leader-Williams N. (2003) Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature, 426, 6770.
TCU (Tribunal de Contas da União) (2010) Relatório e Parecer Prévio sobre as Contas do Governo da República: Exercício de 2009. Http://portal2.tcu.gov.br/portal/page/portal/TCU/comunidades/contas/contas_governo/contas_09/Textos/CG%202009%20Relat%C3%B3rio.pdf [accessed 8 September 2014].
TCU (Tribunal de Contas da União) (2013a) Referencial básico de governança: aplicável a órgãos e entidades da administração pública. Http://portal2.tcu.gov.br/portal/pls/portal/docs/2642557.PDF [accessed 8 September 2014].
TCU (Tribunal de Contas da União) (2013b) Relatório e Parecer Prévio Sobre as Contas do Governo da República: Exercício de 2012. Http://portal2.tcu.gov.br/portal/page/portal/TCU/comunidades/contas/contas_governo/Contas2012/fichas/CG%202012%20Relat%C3%B3rio%20Sess%C3%A3o_Web.pdf [accessed 8 September 2014].
Zampier D. (2013) Questões processuais e falta de pessoal motivam lentidão da Justiça, dizem presidentes de tribunais. Http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/noticia/2013-02-22/questoes-processuais-e-falta-de-pessoal-motivam-lentidao-da-justica-dizem-presidentes-de-tribunais [accessed 8 September 2014].
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 63 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 268 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.