Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

On taxing wildlife films and exposure to nature

  • Sven Wunder (a1) and Douglas Sheil (a2)
Abstract

Some conservation finance strategies feature taxes on nature's benign, and arguably educational, uses. This applies to a recent proposal to extract payment from producers of nature films and also to past efforts to raise entrance fees to protected areas. We argue that, as they are currently formulated, it is misleading to label these proposals as payments for environmental service schemes, as they lack voluntary and conditional payments. Rather, they are a form of taxation. Such revenue-seeking measures may prove to be short-sighted. They will raise prices and curtail the demand for those environmental services that embody some element of education, thus reducing public exposure to nature. This could diminish public awareness, curb people's biophilia and devalue Nature's ‘existence values’. This drive for more conservation cash income in the short term could undermine a broad, long-term societal basis for conservation and its future financing.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      On taxing wildlife films and exposure to nature
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      On taxing wildlife films and exposure to nature
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      On taxing wildlife films and exposure to nature
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail s.wunder@cgiar.org
References
Hide All
Brooks, T.M., Wright, S.J. & Sheil, D. (2009) Evaluating the success of conservation actions in safeguarding tropical forest biodiversity. Conservation Biology, 23, 14481457.
Bruner, A.G., Gullison, R.E. & Balmford, A. (2004) Financial costs and shortfalls of managing and expanding protected-area systems in developing countries. BioScience, 54, 11191126.
Drumm, A. & Moore, A. (2005) Ecotourism Development: A Manual for Conservation Planners and Managers. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, USA.
Engel, S., Pagiola, S. & Wunder, S. (2008) Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65, 663675.
Evans, S.M., Gill, M.E. & Marchant, J. (1996) Schoolchildren as educators: the indirect influence of environmental education in schools on parents’ attitudes towards the environment. Journal of Biological Education, 30, 243248.
Ferraro, P. & Kiss, A. (2002) Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science, 29, 17181719.
Firn, R.D. (2003) Bioprospecting—why is it so unrewarding? Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 207216.
Fortner, R.W. & Lyon, A. E. (1985) Effects of a Cousteau television special on viewer knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education, 16, 1220.
Jepson, P., Jennings, S., Jones, K.E. & Hodgetts, E. (2011) Entertainment value: should the media pay for nature conservation? Science, 334, 13511352.
Kong, L., Yuen, B., Sodhi, N.S. & Briffett, C. (1999) The construction and experience of nature: perspectives of urban youths. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 90, 316.
Miller, J. (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 431434.
Novacek, M.J. (2008) Engaging the public in biodiversity issues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (suppl. 1), 1157111578.
Pearson, E., Dorrian, J. & Litchfield, C. (2011) Harnessing visual media in environmental education: increasing knowledge of orang-utan conservation issues and facilitating sustainable behaviour through video presentations. Environmental Education Research, 17, 751767.
Pyle, R.M. (2003) Nature matrix: reconnecting people and nature. Oryx, 37, 206214.
Simpson, D. & Sedjo, R. (2004) Golden rule of economics yet to strike prospectors. Nature, 430(7001), 723723.
Strassburg, B., Turner, R.K., Fisher, B., Schaeffer, R. & Lovett, A. (2009) Reducing emissions from deforestation—the ‘combined incentives’ mechanism and empirical simulations. Global Environmental Change, 19, 265278.
Vogel, J. (ed.) (2000) The Biodiversity Cartel: Transforming Traditional Knowledge into Trade Secrets. CARE, Quito, Peru.
Wilson, E.O. (1984) Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.
Wunder, S. (2003) Native tourism, natural forests and local incomes on Ilha Grande, Brazil. In Tourism and Development in Tropical Islands. A Political Ecology Perspective (ed. Gössling, S.), pp. 148177. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, USA.
Wunder, S. (2012) Of PES and other animals. Oryx, 46, 12.
Zaradic, P.A., Pergams, O.R.W. & Kareiva, P. (2009) The impact of nature experience on willingness to support conservation. PLoS ONE, 4(10):e7367.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed