Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The socio-economic impact of conservation: the Safe Islands for Seabirds LIFE project

  • José Benedicto Royuela (a1), Sandra Hervías Parejo (a2), Azucena de la Cruz (a3), Pedro Geraldes (a3), Luis T. Costa (a4) and Artur Gil (a5)...

Abstract

Using the Safe Islands for Seabirds LIFE project as a case study, we assessed the socio-economic impact of a nature conservation project on the local community, focusing on the wealth created and the jobs supported directly and indirectly by the project. The Safe Islands for Seabirds project took place during 2009–2012, mainly on Corvo Island, the smallest and least populated island of Portugal's Azores Archipelago. To assess the impact of the project we used a combination of methods to analyse the project expenditure, the jobs created directly as a result of it, and, by means of multipliers, the incomes and jobs it supported indirectly. We estimate that during 2009–2012 direct expenditure of EUR 344,212.50 from the project increased the gross domestic product of the Azorean region by EUR 206,527.50. Apart from the 4.5 jobs created directly by the project, it also supported indirectly the equivalent of 1.5–2.5 full-time jobs. The project also provided the opportunity to preserve and promote natural amenities important for the quality of life of the local community. Our findings show that a nature conservation project can have positive economic impacts, and we recommend the creation of a standardized tool to calculate in a straightforward but accurate manner the socio-economic impacts of conservation projects. We also highlight the need to design projects that support local economies.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The socio-economic impact of conservation: the Safe Islands for Seabirds LIFE project
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The socio-economic impact of conservation: the Safe Islands for Seabirds LIFE project
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The socio-economic impact of conservation: the Safe Islands for Seabirds LIFE project
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

(Corresponding author) E-mail jose.benedictor@gmx.com

References

Hide All
Adams, W.M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J. et al. (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science, 306, 11461149.
Aronson, J., Clewell, A.F., Blignaut, J.N. & Milton, S.J. (2006) Ecological restoration: a new frontier for nature conservation and economics. Journal for Nature Conservation, 14, 135139.
Aronson, J., Milton, S.J. & Blignaut, J.N. (2007) Restoring Natural Capital: Science, Business and Practice. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Baaijens, S.R., Nijkamp, P. & Van Montfort, K. (1998) Explanatory meta-analysis for the comparison and transfer of regional tourist income multipliers. Regional Studies, 32, 839849.
BenDor, T., Lester, T.W., Livengood, A., Davis, A. & Yonavjak, L. (2015) Estimating the size and impact of the ecological restoration economy. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0128339.
Benedicto, J. (2012) Avaliação socioeconómica do projecto LIFE ‘Ilhas santuário para as Aves Marinhas’ na ilha do Corvo e na Região Autónoma dos Açores. Http://life-corvo.spea.pt/pt/documentos/ [accessed 23 March 2016].
Boardman, E. (2013) Preliminary Socio Economic Impact Assessment TasWind King Island, Tasmania. E3 Planning. Http://www.hydro.com.au/system/files/TasWind/Final_Draft_Socio_Econ_Taswind_10_04_13.pdf [accessed 6 March 2017].
Bockstael, N.E., Freeman, A.M. III, Kopp, R.J., Portney, P.R. & Kerry Smith, V. (2000) On measuring economic values for nature. Environmental Science & Technology, 34, 13841389.
Bullock, J.M., Aronson, J., Newton, A.C., Pywell, R.F. & Rey-Benayas, J.M. (2011) Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26, 541549.
Chape, S., Harrison, J., Spalding, M. & Lysenko, I. (2005) Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360, 443455.
Chapuis, J.L., Boussès, P. & Barnaud, G. (1994) Alien mammals, impact and management in the French subantarctic islands. Biological Conservation, 67, 97104.
Cruz, A. & Benedicto, J. (2009) Socio-Economic Benefits of Natura 2000: Case Study on the Ecosystem Services Provided by SPA Pico Da Vara/Ribeira Do Guilherme. Output of the EC project Financing Natura 2000: Cost estimate and benefits of Natura 2000. Http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/financing/docs/azores_case_study.pdf [accessed 23 March 2016].
Cruz, A., Benedicto, J. & Gil, A. (2008) O Projecto LIFE Priolo—Avaliação socioeconómica de um sítio Natura 2000. Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cruz, A., Benedicto, J. & Gil, A. (2011) Socio-economic benefits of Natura 2000 in Azores Islands—a case study approach on ecosystem services provided by a Special Protected Area. Journal of Coastal Research, SI64, 19551959.
D'Amato, D., Kettunen, M., Cruz, A., Benedicto, J. & Gil, A. (2013) Annex 1. Scoping assessments of benefits provided by protected areas—an example of application. In Social and Economic Benefits of Protected Areas: An Assessment Guide (eds Kettunen, M. & ten Brink, P.), pp. 8793. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.
Department of Prospective Evaluation and Planning (Departamento de Prospectiva e Planeamento) (2005) Avaliação do Impacto dos Programas Operacionais, Regionais (QCA III) EM 2000–2003. Departamento de Prospectiva e Planeamento, Lisbon, Portugal.
Dumont, Y., Russell, J.C., Lecomte, V. & Le Corre, M. (2010) Conservation of endangered endemic seabirds within a multi-predator context: the Barau's petrel in Réunion Island. Nature Resource Modeling, 23, 381436.
European Commission (2013) Natura 2000 Barometer. Http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/barometer/index_en.htm [accessed 23 March 2016].
European Commission (2015a) Species protection. Http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/index_en.htm [accessed 23 March 2016].
European Commission (2015b) The LIFE Programme. Http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/about/index.htm [accessed 23 March 2016].
European Commission (2015c) LIFE (2014–2020). Http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/funding/lifeplus.htm [accessed 23 March 2016].
European Commission (2015d) EU annual budget life-cycle: figures. Http://ec.europa.eu/budget/annual/index_en.cfm [accessed 23 March 2016].
Fernandes, J.P., Guiomar, N. & Gil, A. (2015) Strategies for conservation planning and management of terrestrial ecosystems in small islands (exemplified for the Macaronesian islands). Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 122.
Ferraro, P.J. & Pattanayak, S.K. (2006) Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biology, 4(4), e105.
Ferraro, P.J. & Pressey, R.L. (2015) Measuring the difference made by conservation initiatives: protected areas and their environmental and social impacts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370, 20140270.
Gantioler, S. & ten Brink, P. (2013) Wider socio-economic benefits. In Social and Economic Benefits of Protected Areas: An Assessment Guide (eds Kettunen, M. & ten Brink, P.), pp. 226244. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.
Gurney, G.G., Pressey, R.L., Cinner, J.E., Pollnac, R. & Campbell, S.J. (2015) Integrated conservation and development: evaluating a community-based marine protected area project for equality of socioeconomic impacts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370, 20140277.
Hervías Parejo, S., Benedicto Royuela, J., Rodríguez-Luengo, J.L., Ramos, J.A., Medina, F.M., Geraldes, P. et al. (2015) The impact and legislative framework of invasive mammals on Portuguese Macaronesian islands: a case study on Corvo, Azores. Environmental Science & Policy, 52, 120128.
Homewood, K. (2013) Monitoring and evaluating the socioeconomic impacts of conservation projects on local communities. In Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation: Bridging the Gap Between Global Commitment and Local Action (eds Collen, B., Pettorelli, N., Baillie, J.E.M. & Durant, S.M.), pp. 265290. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, UK.
INE (Instituto Nacional de Estatística) (2011) Census hub. Http://censos.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=CENSOS&xpgid=censos2011_apresentacao [accessed 23 March 2016].
IUCN (2015) Ecosystem Restoration. Http://www.iucn.org/about/union/commissions/cem/cem_work/cem_restoration/ [accessed 23 March 2016].
Kari, S. & Korhonen-Kurki, K. (2013) Framing local outcomes of biodiversity conservation through ecosystem services: a case study from Ranomafana, Madagascar. Ecosystem Services, 3, 3239.
Molloy, D., Thomas, S. & Morling, P. (2011) RSPB Reserves and Local Economies 2002. RSPB. Http://www.rspb.org.uk/our-work/our-positions-and-campaigns/positions/economics/casefornature/Economies/localeconomies.aspx [accessed 6 March 2017].
Morrissey, K. & O'Donoghue, C. (2013) The role of the marine sector in the Irish national economy: an input–output analysis. Marine Policy, 37, 230238.
Nielsen-Pincus, M. & Moseley, C. (2010) Economic and employment impacts of forest and watershed restoration in Oregon. Working Paper Number 24. Ecosystem Workforce Program, University of Oregon, Eugene, USA.
Pagiola, S., Ramírez, E., Gobbi, J., de Haan, C., Ibrahim, M., Murgueitio, E. & Ruíz, J.P. (2007) Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua. Ecological Economics, 64, 374385.
Shiel, A., Rayment, M. & Burton, G. (2002) RSPB Reserves and Local Economies. Https://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/Reserves%20and%20Local%20Economies_tcm9-133069.pdf [accessed 6 March 2017].
SPEA (Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves) (2013) LIFE+ Safe Islands for Seabirds. Relatório Final. Http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.showFile&rep=file&fil=LIFE07_NAT_P_000649_FTR_PT.pdf [accessed 10 January 2017].
SREA (2015) Http://estatistica.azores.gov.pt/ [accessed 23 March 2016].
ten Brink, P., Mazza, L., Badura, T., Kettunen, M. & Withana, S. (2012) Nature and its Role in the Transition to a Green Economy. Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels, Belgium. Http://www.teebweb.org/publication/nature-and-its-role-in-a-green-economy/ [accessed 23 March 2016].
The Trust for Public Land (2016) Conservation Economics. Https://www.tpl.org/services/conservation-finance/conservation-economics [accessed 28 July 2016].
UNEP (2013) UNEP Studies of EIA Practice in Developing Countries. Http://unep.ch/etb/publications/Compendium.htm [accessed 23 March 2016].
University of Oregon (2013) Restoration investment impacts in Oregon. Http://ewp.uoregon.edu/sites/ewp.uoregon.edu/files/restoration_investment.pdf [accessed 27 July 2016].

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The socio-economic impact of conservation: the Safe Islands for Seabirds LIFE project

  • José Benedicto Royuela (a1), Sandra Hervías Parejo (a2), Azucena de la Cruz (a3), Pedro Geraldes (a3), Luis T. Costa (a4) and Artur Gil (a5)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.