Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Threatened predator on the equator: multi-point abundance estimates of the tiger Panthera tigris in central Sumatra

  • undefined Sunarto (a1), Marcella J. Kelly (a1), Sybille Klenzendorf (a2), Michael R. Vaughan (a1), undefined Zulfahmi (a3), M.B. Hutajulu (a4) and Karmila Parakkasi (a3)...

Information on spatial and temporal variation in abundance is crucial for effective management of wildlife. Yet abundance estimates for the Critically Endangered Sumatran tiger Panthera tigris sumatrae are lacking from Riau, the province historically believed to hold the largest percentage of this subspecies. Recently, this area has had one of the highest global rates of deforestation. Using camera traps we investigated tiger abundance across peatland, flat lowland, and hilly lowland forest types in the province, and over time, in the newly established Tesso Nilo National Park, central Sumatra. We estimated densities using spatially explicit capture–recapture, calculated with DENSITY, and traditional capture–recapture models, calculated with CAPTURE. With spatially explicit capture–recapture the lowest tiger density (0.34 ± SE 0.24 per 100 km2) was estimated in the hilly lowland forest of Rimbang Baling and the highest (0.87 ± SE 0.33 per 100 km2) in the flat lowland forest of the Park. Repeated surveys in the Park documented densities of 0.63 ± SE 0.28 in 2005 to 0.87 ± SE 0.33 per 100 km2 in 2008. Compared to traditional capture–recapture the spatially explicit capture–recapture approach resulted in estimates 50% lower. Estimates of tiger density from this study were lower than most previous estimates in other parts of Sumatra. High levels of human activity in the area appear to limit tigers. The results of this study, which covered areas and habitat types not previously surveyed, are important for overall population estimates across the island, provide insight into the response of carnivores to habitat loss, and are relevant to the interventions needed to save the tiger.

Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

K.P. Burnham & D. Anderson (1998) Model Selection and Multi-model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edition. Springer, New York, USA.

C. Carbone , T. Coulson , S. Christie , K. Conforti , J. Seidensticker , N. Franklin (2001) The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Animal Conservation, 4, 7579.

C. Carbone & J.L. Gittleman (2002) A common rule for the scaling of carnivore density. Science, 295, 22732276.

M. Efford (2004) Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos, 106, 598610.

D.L.A. Gaveau , J. Epting , O. Lyne , M. Linkie , I. Kumara & M. Kanninen (2009) Evaluating whether protected areas reduce tropical deforestation in Sumatra. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 21652175.

B.D. Gerber , S.M. Karpanty & M.J. Kelly (2012) Evaluating the potential biases in carnivore capture–recapture studies associated with the use of lure and varying density estimation techniques using photographic-sampling data of the Malagasy civet. Population Ecology, 54, 4354.

M. Griffiths & C.P. van Schaik (1993) The impact of human traffic on the abundance and activity periods of Sumatran rain forest wildlife. Conservation Biology, 7, 623626.

A. Harihar , B. Pandav & S.P. Goyal (2009) Responses of tigers (Panthera tigris) and their prey to removal of anthropogenic influences in Rajaji National Park, India. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 55, 97105.

K.U. Karanth (1995) Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture recapture models. Biological Conservation, 71, 333338.

K.U. Karanth & J.D. Nichols (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology, 79, 28522862.

K.U. Karanth , J.D. Nichols , N.S. Kumar & J.E. Hines (2006) Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture–recapture sampling. Ecology, 87, 29252937.

K.U. Karanth , J.D. Nichols , N.S. Kumar , W.A. Link & J.E. Hines (2004) Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101, 48544858.

K.U. Karanth & M.E. Sunquist (1995) Prey selection by tiger, leopard and dhole in tropical forests. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 439450.

K. Kawanishi & M. Sunquist (2004) Conservation status of tigers in a primary rainforest of Peninsular Malaysia. Biological Conservation, 120, 329344.

Y. Laumonier (1997) The Vegetation and Physiography of Sumatra. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

M. Linkie , G. Chapron , D.J. Martyr , J. Holden & N. Leader-Williams (2006) Assessing the viability of tiger subpopulations in a fragmented landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 576586.

M. Linkie , I.A. Haidir , A. Nugroho & Y. Dinata (2008z) Conserving tigers Panthera tigris in selectively logged Sumatran forests. Biological Conservation, 141, 2410–2315.

V. Morell (2007) Can the wild tiger survive? Science, 317, 13121314.

T.G. O'Brien , M.F. Kinnaird & H.T. Wibisono (2003) Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Animal Conservation, 6, 131139.

M.E. Obbard , E.J. Howe & C.J. Kyle (2010) Empirical comparison of density estimators for large carnivores. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 7684.

R.K. Sharma , Y. Jhala , Q. Qureshi , J. Vattakaven , R. Gopal & K. Nayak (2010) Evaluating capture–recapture population and density estimation of tigers in a population with known parameters. Animal Conservation, 13, 94103.

C.A. Tredick & M.R. Vaughan (2009) DNA-based population demographics of black bears in coastal North Carolina and Virginia. Journal of Wildlife Management, 73, 10311039.

J. Walston , J.G. Robinson , E.L. Bennett , U. Breitenmoser , G.A.B. da Fonseca , J. Goodrich (2010) Bringing the tiger back from the brink—the six percent solution. PLoS Biology, 8, 14.

H.T. Wibisono & W. Pusparini (2010) Sumatran tiger (Panthera tigris sumatrae): a review of conservation status. Integrative Zoology, 5, 309318.

E. Wikramanayake , E. Dinerstein , J. Seidensticker , S. Lumpkin , B. Pandav , M. Shrestha (2011) A landscape-based conservation strategy to double the wild tiger population. Conservation Letters, 4, 219227.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 444 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.