Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Cited by 225

  • Get access
    Add to cart USD35.00
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register

Disparity as an evolutionary index: a comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods

  • Matthew A. Wills (a1), Derek E. G. Briggs (a1) and Richard A. Fortey (a2)

Abstract

Disparity is a measure of the range or significance of morphology in a given sample of organisms, as opposed to diversity, which is expressed in terms of the number (and sometimes ranking) of taxa. At present there is no agreed definition of disparity, much less any consensus on how to measure it. Two possible categories of metric are considered here, one independent of any hypothesis of relationship (phenetics), the other constrained within an evolutionary framework (cladistics).

The Early Cambrian radiation was clearly a period of significant morphologic and taxonomic diversification. However, we question the interpretation of its first generation products as numerous body plans at the highest level. Four phenetic and two cladistic measures have been used to compare disparity among Cambrian arthropods with that in the living fauna. Phenetic methods assessing character-state variability and the amount of morphological attribute space occupied yield similar results for Cambrian and Recent arthropods. Assessments of disparity within a taxonomic framework rely on the identification of particular characters that delineate higher level body plans. This requires a phylogenetic interpretation, a cladistic investigation of hierarchical structure in the data. Both sets of arthropods fall within the same major clades, and within this cladistic framework the amount of character-state evolution in the two groups is comparable. None of these methods identifies markedly greater disparity among the Cambrian compared with the Recent taxa.

Although measures of disparity are applied here to a consideration of the Cambrian radiation, the metrics clearly have a much wider potential for estimating macroevolutionary trends independently from existing taxonomic frameworks. Geometric morphometry is ideal for measuring morphological variety at lower taxonomic levels, but it requires the recognition of homologous landmarks in all the forms under comparison, or the identification of entire homologous structures. Conventional phenetics has much wider application as it can operate on data coded as discrete homologous character states (this facility is also a requirement of cladistics), which are a more appropriate basis for comparing disparity in markedly dissimilar forms.

Copyright

COPYRIGHT: © The Paleontological Society 

References

Hide All
Anderson, D. T. 1973. Embryology and phylogeny of the annelids and arthropods. Pergamon, Oxford.
Archie, J. W. 1989a. A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data. Systematic Zoology 38:239–252.
Archie, J. W. 1989b. Homoplasy excess ratios: new indices for measuring levels of homoplasy in systematics and a critique of the consistency index. Systematic Zoology 38:253–269.
Archie, J. W. 1989c. Phylogenies of plant families: a demonstration of phylogenetic randomness in DNA sequence data derived from proteins. Systematic Zoology 38:239–252.
Ballard, J. W. O., Olsen, G. J., Faith, D. P., Odgers, W. A., Rowell, D. M., and Atkinson, P. W. 1992. Evidence from 12S ribosomal RNA that onychophorans are modified arthropods. Science 258:1345–1348.
Bard, J. 1990. The fifth day of creation. Bioessays 12:303–306.
Bergström, J. 1976. Early arthropod morphology and relationships. Twenty-fifth International Geological Congress Abstracts, p. 289.
Bergström, J. 1979. Morphology of fossil arthropods as a guide to phylogenetic relationships. Arthropod phylogeny. Pp. 3–56in Gupta, 1979.
Bergström, J. 1981. Morphology and systematics of early arthropods. Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg 23:7–42.
Bergström, J. 1992. The oldest arthropods and the origin of the Crustacea. Acta Zoologica 73:287–291.
Bookstein, F. L., Chernoff, B., Elder, R. L., Humphries, J. M., Smith, G. R., and Strauss, R. E. 1985. Morphometrics in evolutionary biology. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Special Publication 15.
Boudreaux, H. B. 1979a. Significance of intersegmental tendon systems in arthropod phylogeny, and a monophyletic classification of the Arthropoda. Pp. 551–586in Gupta, 1979.
Boudreaux, H. B. 1979b. Arthropod phylogeny, with special reference to insects. Wiley, New York.
Briggs, D. E. G. 1981. The arthropod Odaraia alata Walcott, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 291:541–585.
Briggs, D. E. G. 1983. Affinities and early evolution of the Crustacea: the evidence of the Cambrian fossils. Pp. 1–22in Schram, F. R., ed. Crustacean phylogeny. Balkema, Rotterdam.
Briggs, D. E. G. 1990. Early arthropods: dampening the Cambrian explosion. Pp. 24–43in Culver, S. J., ed. Arthropod paleobiology. Short courses in paleontology, no. 3. Paleontological Society, Knoxville, Tenn.
Briggs, D. E. G., and Collins, D. 1988. A Middle Cambrian chelicerate from Mount Stephen, British Columbia. Paleontology 31:71–73.
Briggs, D. E. G., and Fortey, R. A. 1989. The early radiation and relationships of the major arthropod groups. Science 246:241–243.
Briggs, D. E. G., and Whittington, H. B. 1981. Relationships of arthropods from the Burgess Shale and other Cambrian sequences. Pp. 38–41in Taylor, M. E., ed. Short papers for the Second International Symposium on the Cambrian System. U.S. Geological Survey, Open File Report 81-743.
Briggs, D. E. G., and Whittington, H. B. 1985. The mode of life of the Burgess Shale arthropods. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh; Earth Sciences 76:149–160.
Briggs, D. E. G., Fortey, R. A., and Wills, M. A. 1992a. Morphological disparity in the Cambrian. Science 256:1670–1673.
Briggs, D. E. G., Fortey, R. A., and Wills, M. A. 1992b. Cambrian and Recent morphological disparity. (Response to Foote and Gould, and Lee). Science 258:1817–1818.
Briggs, D. E. G., Fortey, R. A., and Wills, M. A. 1993. How big was the Cambrian explosion? A taxonomic and morphologic comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods. Pp. 33–44in Lees, D. R. and Edwards, D., eds. Evolutionary patterns and processes. Linnean Society Symposium Series. Linnean Society of London.
Brusca, R. C., and Brusca, G. J. 1990. Invertebrates. Sinauer, Mass.
Bruton, D. L., and Whittington, H. B. 1983. Emeraldella and Leanchoilia, two arthropods from the Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 300:553–585.
Butterfield, N. J. 1990. A reassessment of the enigmatic Burgess Shale fossil Wiwaxia corrugata (Matthew) and its relationship to the polychaete Canadia spinosa Walcott. Paleobiology 16:287–303.
Calman, W. T. 1909. Crustacea. Pp. 1–346in Lankester, R., ed. Treatise on zoology VII (Appendiculata) (Fascicule 3). Adam & Black, London.
Cherry, L. M., Case, S. M., Kunkel, J. G., Wyles, J. S., and Wilson, A. C. 1982. Body shape metrics and organismal evolution. Evolution 35:914–933.
Cisne, J. L. 1974. Trilobites and the origins of arthropods. Science 186:13–18.
Conway Morris, S. 1985. The Middle Cambrian metazoan Wiwaxia corrugata (Matthew) from the Burgess Shale and Ogygopsis Shale, British Columbia, Canada. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 307:507–586.
Conway Morris, S. 1986. The community structure of the Middle Cambrian phyllopod bed (Burgess Shale). Palaeontology 29:423–467.
Conway Morris, S. 1992. Burgess Shale-type faunas in the context of the “Cambrian explosion”: a review. Journal of the Geological Society of London 149:631–636.
Donoghue, M. J., Doyle, J. A., Gauthier, J., Kluge, A. G., and Rowe, T. 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20:431–460.
Dunn, G., and Everitt, B. S. 1982. An introduction to mathematical taxonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Efron, B. 1982. The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
Eldredge, N., and Cracraft, J. 1980. Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New York.
Erwin, D. H. 1990. Carboniferous–Triassic gastropod diversity patterns and the Permo-Triassic mass extinction. Paleobiology 16:187–203.
Erwin, D. H. 1992. A preliminary classification of evolutionary radiations. Historical Biology 6:133–147.
Faith, D. P., and Cranston, P. S. 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone? On permutation tests for cladistic structure. Cladistics 7:1–28.
Field, K. G., Olsen, G. J., Lane, D. J., Giovannoni, S. J., Ghiselin, M. T., Raff, E. C., Pace, N. R., and Raff, R. A. 1988. Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science 239:748–753.
Foote, M. 1989. Perimeter-based Fourier analysis: a new morphometric method applied to the trilobite cranidium. Journal of Paleontology 63:880–885.
Foote, M. 1990. Nearest-neighbor analysis of trilobite morphospace. Systematic Zoology 39:371–382.
Foote, M. 1991a. Morphologic patterns of diversification: examples from trilobites. Palaeontology 34:461–485.
Foote, M. 1991b. Morphological and taxonomic diversity in a clade's history: the blastoid record and stochastic simulations. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, the University of Michigan 28:101–140.
Foote, M. 1991c. Analysis of morphological data. Pp. 59–86in Gilinsky, N. L., and Signor, P. W., eds. Analytical paleobiology. Short courses in paleontology, no. 4. Paleontological Society, Knoxville, Tenn.
Foote, M. 1992a. Rarefaction analysis of morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology 18:17–29.
Foote, M. 1992b. Paleozoic record of morphological diversity in blastozoan echinoderms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 89:7325–7329.
Foote, M. 1993. Discordance and concordance between morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology 19:185–204.
Foote, M., and Gould, S. J. 1992. Cambrian and Recent morphological disparity. Science 258:1816.
Fortey, R. A., and Owens, R. M. 1990. Trilobites. Pp. 121–142in McNamara, K. J., ed. Evolutionary trends. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Fryer, G. 1992. The origin of the Crustacea. Acta Zoologica 73:273–286.
Gould, S. J. 1989. Wonderful life. The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. Norton, New York.
Gould, S. J. 1991. The disparity of the Burgess Shale arthropod fauna and the limits of cladistic analysis: why we must strive to quantify morphospace. Paleobiology 17:411–423.
Gower, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325–338.
Gower, J. C., and Ross, G. J. S. 1969. Minimum spanning trees and single-linkage cluster analysis. Applied Statistics 18:54–64.
Gupta, A. P. 1979. Arthropod phylogeny. Van Nostrand, New York.
Hessler, R. R., and Newman, W. A. 1975. A trilobitomorph origin for the Crustacea. Fossils and Strata 4:437–459.
Iwanoff, P. P. 1928. Die entwicklung der Larvalsegmente bei den anneliden. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere 10:62–161.
Jeffers, J. N. R. 1967. Two case studies in the application of principal component analysis. Applied Statistics 16:225–236.
Kovach, W. L. 1990. MVSP users' manual. Cambrian Printers, Aberystwyth.
Kruskal, J. B. 1964a. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrica 29:1–27.
Kruskal, J. B. 1964b. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrica 29:1–27.
Lee, M. S. Y. 1992. Cambrian and Recent morphological disparity. Science 258:1816–1817.
McMenamin, M. A. S., and McMenamin, D. L. S. 1990. The emergence of animals, the Cambrian breakthrough. Columbia University Press, New York.
Patterson, C., and Rosen, D. E. 1977. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 158:81–172.
Pielou, E. C. 1975. Ecological diversity. Wiley, New York.
Pimentel, R. A., and Riggins, R. 1987. The nature of cladistic data. Cladistics 3:201–209.
Ramsköld, L., and Edgecombe, G. D. 1991. Trilobite monophyly revisited. Historical Biology 4:267–283.
Raup, D. M., and Gould, S. J. 1974. Stochastic simulation and evolution of morphology—towards a nonmothetic paleontology. Systematic Zoology 23:305–322.
Ridley, M. 1990. Dreadful beasts. The London Review of Books, June 28:11–12.
Riedl, R. 1978. Order in living organisms. Wiley, New York.
Rohlf, F. J. 1973. Algorithm 76. Hierarchical clustering using the minimum spanning tree. Computer Journal 16:93–95.
Rohlf, F. J., and Sokal, R. R. 1965. Coefficients of correlation and distance in numerical taxonomy. University of Kansas Scientific Bulletin 45:3–27.
Runnegar, B. 1987. Rates and modes of evolution in the Mollusca. Pp. 39–60in Campbell, K. S. W. and Day, M. F., eds. Rates of evolution. Allen and Unwin, London.
Saunders, W. B., and Swan, A. R. H. 1984. Morphology and morphologic diversity of mid-Carboniferous (Namurian) ammonoids in time and space. Paleobiology 10:195–228.
Schank, J. C., and Wimsatt, W. C. 1986. Generative entrenchment and evolution. Philosophy of Science Association 2:33–60.
Schram, F. R. 1978. Arthropods: a convergent phenomenon. Fieldiana: Geology 39:61–108.
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., and Kendrick, D. C. 1993. Numerical experiments with model monophyletic and paraphyletic taxa. Paleobiology 19:168–184.
Sharov, A. G. 1966. Basic arthropodan stock. Pergamon, New York.
Shepard, R. N. 1962. The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function, I and II. Psychometrika 27:125–140, 219-246.
Shepard, R. N. 1966. Metric structures in oridinal data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3:287–315.
Shergold, J. H. 1991. Protaspid and early meraspid growth stages of the eodiscoid trilobite Pagetia ocellata Jell, and their implications for classification. Alcheringa 15:65–86.
Simonetta, A., and Delle Cave, L. 1975. The Cambrian non trilobite arthropods from the Burgess Shale of British Columbia. A study of their comparative morphology, taxonomy and evolutionary significance. Palaeontographica Italica 69:1–37.
Smith, A. B. 1994. Systematics and the fossil record: documenting evolutionary patterns. Blackwell Scientific, Boston.
Sneath, P. H. A. 1962. The construction of taxonomic groups. Pp. 289–332in Ainsworth, G. C. and Sneath, P. H. A., eds. Microbial classification. Twelfth Symposium of the Society for General Microbiology. Cambridge University Press.
Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, R. R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Snodgrass, R. E. 1938. The evolution of the Annelida, Onychophora and Arthropoda. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 97:1–59.
Snodgrass, R. E. 1950. Comparative studies of the jaws of mandibulate arthropods. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 116:1–85.
Snodgrass, R. E. 1956. Crustacean metamorphosis. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 131:1–78.
Snodgrass, R. E. 1958. Evolution of arthropod mechanisms. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 138:1–77.
Sokal, R. R. 1961. Distance as a measure of taxonomic similarity. Systematic Zoology 10:70–79.
Sokal, R. R., and Michener, C. D. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas Scientific Bulletin 38:1409–1438.
Sokal, R. R., and Sneath, P. H. A. 1963. Princples of numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Størmer, L. 1944. On the relationships and phylogeny of fossil and Recent Arachnomorpha. Skrifter utgitt av det Norske Vidensk Academi i Oslo 5:1–158.
Stanley, S. M. 1979. Macroevolution: pattern and process. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Stubblefield, C. J. 1960. Evolution in trilobites. Quarterly Journal of the Zoological Society of London 115:145–162.
Swofford, D. L. 1990. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.0. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
Temple, J. T. 1980. A numerical taxonomic study of the Trinucleidae (Trilobita) from the British Isles. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 71:213–233.
Temple, J. T. 1982. Ordination of palaeontological data. Miscellaneous Papers of the Geological Society of London 14:224–236.
Temple, J. T., and Tripp, R. P. 1979. An investigation of the Encrinurinae (Trilobita) by numerical taxonomic methods. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 70:223–250.
Temple, J. T., and Wu, H.-J. 1990. Numerical taxonomy of Encrinurinae (Trilobita): additional species from China and elsewhere. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 81:209–219.
Turbeville, J. M., Pfeifer, D. M., Field, K. G., and Raff, R. A. 1991. The phylogenetic status of arthropods, as inferred from 18S RNA sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 8:669–686.
Valentine, J. W. 1969. Patterns of taxonomic and ecological structure of the shelf benthos during Phanerozoic time. Palaeontology 12:684–709.
Valentine, J. W. 1977. General patterns in Metazoan evolution. Pp. 27–57in Hallam, A., ed. Patterns of evolution as illustrated by the fossil record. Elsevier Scientific, Oxford.
Valentine, J. W. 1989. Bilaterians of the Precambrian-Cambrian transition and the annelid-arthropod relationship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 86:2272–2275.
Van Valen, L. 1974. Multivariate structural statistics in natural history. Journal of Theoretical Biology 45:235–247.
Walcott, C. D. 1908. Mount Stephen rocks and fossils. Canadian Alpine Journal 1:232–248.
Walcott, C. D. 1911. Middle Cambrian Merostomata. Cambrian geology and palaeontology, II. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 57:17–40.
Walcott, C. D. 1912. Middle Cambrian Branchiopoda, Malacostraca, Trilobita and Merostomata. Cambrian geology and palaeontology, II. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 57:109–144.
Weygoldt, P. 1979. Significance of later embryonic stages and head development in arthropod phylogeny. Pp. 107–135in Gupta, 1979.
Whittington, H. B. 1985. The Burgess Shale. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. Wiley, New York.
Wimsatt, W. C., and Schank, J. C. 1988. Two constraints on the evolution of complex adaptations and the means for their avoidance. Pp. 231–237in Nitecki, M. H., ed. Evolutionary progress. University of Chicago Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
  • Cited by 225

  • Get access
    Add to cart USD35.00
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register

Disparity as an evolutionary index: a comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods

  • Matthew A. Wills (a1), Derek E. G. Briggs (a1) and Richard A. Fortey (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.