Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:30:05.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multivariate stasis in the dental morphology of the Paleocene-Eocene condylarth Ectocion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Aaron R. Wood
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. E-mail: aarwood@umich.edu
Miriam L. Zelditch
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. E-mail: aarwood@umich.edu
Adam N. Rountrey
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. E-mail: aarwood@umich.edu
Thomas P. Eiting
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. E-mail: aarwood@umich.edu
H. David Sheets
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Canisius College, 2001 Main Street, Buffalo, New York 14208
Philip D. Gingerich
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. E-mail: aarwood@umich.edu

Abstract

Evolutionary stasis has often been explained by stabilizing selection, intrinsic constraints, or, more recently, by spatially patterned population dynamics. To distinguish which of these mechanisms explains a given case of stasis in the fossil record, stasis must first be rigorously documented in a high-resolution stratigraphic time series of fossil specimens. Furthermore, past studies of evolutionary mode in fossil mammalian lineages have often been limited to univariate traits (e.g., molar crown area). It is reasonable to assume that tooth shape, a multivariate trait, reflects important additional aspects of tooth form and function. Here we present the results of a geometric morphometric analysis of the lower dentition of the Paleocene-Eocene condylarth species Ectocion osbornianus collected from the Bighorn and Clarks Fork Basins of northwestern Wyoming. Tooth margin shape, cusp configuration, and shearing crest shape were digitized for the last lower premolar, p4, and for two lower molars, m1 and m3. Multivariate statistical tests of evolutionary mode were used to analyze the change in shape variance over time in addition to the magnitude and direction of shape change. Test results characterize the shape time series as consisting of counteracting changes with less change than expected under a random walk (i.e., stasis). The temporal structure of shape variance implies that the sampled E. osbornianus most likely represent a single population, which is not concordant with the population dynamic mechanism of stasis. Stabilizing selection and/or intrinsic constraints remain as the mechanisms that could explain stasis in the lower dental shape of E. osbornianus despite the variable environmental conditions of the Paleocene–Eocene.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bell, M. A., Baumgartner, J. V., and Olson, E. C. 1985. Patterns of temporal change in single morphological characters of a Miocene stickleback fish. Paleobiology 11:258271.Google Scholar
Bookstein, F. L. 1987. Random-walk and the existence of evolutionary rates. Paleobiology 13:446464.Google Scholar
Bookstein, F. L. 1988. Random-walk and the biometrics of morphological characters. Evolutionary Biology 23:369398.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, B. 1984. Some quantitative methods for studying evolutionary patterns in single characters. Paleobiology 10:308318.Google Scholar
Clyde, W. C., and Gingerich, P. D. 1994. Rates of evolution in the dentition of early Eocene Cantius: comparison of size and shape. Paleobiology 20:506522.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N., Thompson, J. N., Brakefield, P. M., Gavrilets, S., Jablonski, D., Jackson, J. B. C., Lenski, R. E., Lieberman, B. S., McPeek, M. A., and Miller, W. III. 2005. The dynamics of evolutionary stasis. In Vrba, E. and Eldredge, N., eds. Macroevolution: diversity, disparity, contingency Paleobiology 31(Suppl. to No. 2):133145.Google Scholar
Fricke, H. C., and Wing, S. L. 2004. Oxygen isotope and paleobotanical estimates of temperature and δ18O-latitude gradients over North America during the early Eocene. American Journal of Science 304:612635.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1974. Stratigraphic record of early Eocene Hyopsodus and the geometry of mammalian phylogeny. Nature 248:107109.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1985. Species in the fossil record: concepts, trends, and transitions. Paleobiology 11:2741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1993. Quantification and comparison of evolutionary rates. American Journal of Science 293A:453478.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 2001. Rates of evolution on the time scale of the evolutionary process. Genetica 112:127144.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 2003. Mammalian responses to climate change at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary: Polecat Bench record in the northern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. In Gingerich, P. D., Schmitz, B., Thomas, E., and Wing, S. L., eds. Causes and consequences of globally warm climates in the early Paleogene. Geological Society of America Special Paper 369:463478.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 2006. Environment and evolution through the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:246253.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D., and Gunnell, G. F. 1995. Rates Of evolution in Paleocene-Eocene mammals of the Clarks Fork Basin, Wyoming, and a comparison with Neogene Siwalik lineages of Pakistan. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 115:227247.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. 1978. How rare is phyletic gradualism and what is its evolutionary significance: evidence from Jurassic bivalves. Paleobiology 4:1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, T. F., and Houle, D. 2004. Evolvability, stabilizing selection, and the problem of stasis. Pp. 130150 in Pigliucci, M. and Preston, K., eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Quantum evolution and punctuated equilibria in continuous genetic characters. American Naturalist 119:833848.Google Scholar
Koch, P. L., Clyde, W. C., Hepple, R. P., Fogel, M. L., Wing, S. L., and Zachos, J. C. 2003. Carbon and oxygen isotope records from paleosols spanning the Paleocene-Eocene boundary, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. In Gingerich, P. D., Schmitz, B., Thomas, E., and Wing, S. L., eds. Causes and consequences of globally warm climates in the early Paleogene. Geological Society of America Special Paper 369:4964.Google Scholar
Lande, R. 1986. The dynamics of peak shifts and the pattern of morphological evolution. Paleobiology 12:343354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, S. 1986. Analysis of mammalian communities from the late Eocene and Oligocene of southern France. Paleovertebrata 16:191212.Google Scholar
Lich, D. K. 1990. Cosomys primus: a case for stasis. Paleobiology 16:384395.Google Scholar
Lieberman, B. S., and Dudgeon, S. 1996. An evaluation of stabilizing selection as a mechanism for stasis. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 127:229238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, B. S., Brett, C. E., and Eldredge, N. 1995. A study of stasis and change in two species lineages from the Middle Devonian of New York State. Paleobiology 21:1527.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. 1990. The rate of morphological evolution in mammals from the standpoint of the neutral expectation. American Naturalist 136:727741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, T., and Fortey, R. A. 2002. The Ordovician trilobite Carolinties, a test case for microevolution in a macrofossil lineage. Palaeontology 45:229257.Google Scholar
Mills, J. R. 1981. Occlusion. Pp. 299309 in Osborn, J. W., ed. Dental anatomy and embryology, Vol. 1. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar
Polly, P. D. 2004. On the simulation of the evolution of morphological shape: multivariate shape under selection and drift. Palaeontologica Electronica 7.2. 7A.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1977. Probabilistic models in evolutionary paleobiology. American Scientist 65:5057.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Crick, R. E. 1981. Evolution of single characters in the Jurassic ammonite Kosmoceras . Paleobiology 7:200215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roopnarine, P. D. 2001. The description and classification of evolutionary mode: a computational approach. Paleobiology 27:446465.Google Scholar
Roopnarine, P. D., Murphy, M. A., and Buening, N. 2005. Micro-evolutionary dynamics of the early Devonian conodont Wurmiella from the Great Basin of Nevada. Palaeontologica Electronica 8.2. 31A.Google Scholar
Schankler, D. M. 1981. Local extinction and ecological re-entry of early Eocene mammals. Nature 293:135138.Google Scholar
Sheets, H. D., and Mitchell, C. E. 2001. Why the null matters: statistical tests, random walks and evolution. Genetica 112:105125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, G. G. 1943. Criteria for genera, species, and subspecies in zoology and paleozoology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 44:145178.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1979. Macroevolution: pattern and process. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M., and Yang, X. 1987. Approximate evolutionary stasis for bivalve morphology over millions of years: a multivariate, multilineage study. Paleobiology 13:113139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, R. M. 1971. Deciduous dentition of the early Tertiary Phenacodontidae (Condylarthra, Mammalia). American Museum Novitates 2461.Google Scholar
West, R. M. 1979. Apparent prolonged evolutionary stasis in the middle Eocene hoofed mammal Hyopsodus . Paleobiology 5:252260.Google Scholar
Wing, S. L., Harrington, G. J., Smith, F. A., Bloch, J. I., Boyer, D. M., and Freeman, K. H. 2005. Transient floral change and rapid global warming at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary. Science 310:993996.Google Scholar
Wood, B., Wood, C., and Konigsberg, L. 1994. Paranthropus boisei: an example of evolutionary stasis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 95:117136.Google Scholar
Workman, M. S., Leamy, L. J., Routman, E. J., and Cheverud, J. M. 2002. Analysis of quantitative trait locus effects on the size and shape of mandibular molars in mice. Genetics 160:15731586.Google Scholar
Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., Sheets, H. D., and Fink, W. L. 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier, London.Google Scholar