Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T20:14:34.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative paleoecology of Paleogene and Neogene mammalian faunas: body-size structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Michele E. Morgan
Affiliation:
Dept. of Anthropology, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA 02138 U.S.A.
John Kappelman
Affiliation:
Dept. of Anthropology, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, U.S.A.
Catherine Badgley
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.
Gregg F. Gunnell
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.
Philip D. Gingerich
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.
Mary Maas
Affiliation:
Dept. of Biol. Anthropology & Anatomy, Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27710, U.S.A.
Serge Legendre
Affiliation:
CNRS, Univ. de Montpellier II, Cedex 5, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In mammalian assemblages, size distributions reflect conditions of vegetation and climate as well as biotic interactions among mammals. Paleogene (Wyoming/Montana) and Neogene (Siwalik) mammalian faunas depict strikingly different size distributions in the cenograms below (rank v. size of herbivorous and omnivorous species), because evolutionary increase to substantial size did not become widespread among lineages until the middle Eocene (after our record).

In the Paleocene to early Eocene, substantial faunal turnover with accompanying change in guild structure occurred with little change in size distributions. While maintaining relatively small sizes, lineages of modern mammalian orders replaced species from archaic groups. However, most mammalian lineages experienced size increase, especially through the Wasatchian (early Eocene).

From the middle to late Miocene, significant size increases occurred upsection within several families of Siwalik carnivores, artiodactyls, and rodents. Families of insectivores, primates, proboscideans, and perissodactyls exhibited little change in species sizes despite changes in species composition and number. The trend toward increasing size preceded the widespread development of C4 grasslands in the Siwaliks, suggesting that biotic rather than abiotic factors influenced the size increase.

Type
9. Long Records of Land Biotas: A Comparison of Wyoming-Montana Paleogene and Siwalik Miocene Sequences
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 Paleontological Society