Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:46:51.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The distribution and abundance of Enterobius vermicularis in a South Indian fishing community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

M. R. Haswell-Elkins ,
D. B. Elkins ,
K. Manjula ,
E. Michael  and
R. M. Anderson
M. R. Haswell-Elkins
Affiliation:
Parasite Epidemiology Research Group, Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BB
D. B. Elkins
Affiliation:
Parasite Epidemiology Research Group, Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BB
K. Manjula
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Madras Christian College, Tambaram, Madras 600 059, Tamil Nadu, India
E. Michael
Affiliation:
Parasite Epidemiology Research Group, Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BB
R. M. Anderson
Affiliation:
Parasite Epidemiology Research Group, Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The distribution and abundance of Enterobius vermicularis in a fishing community in South India, as determined by counting worms expelled following mass anthelmintic chemotherapy, was examined in samples of patients stratified by age, sex and family grouping. The results of a worm expulsion study in January 1984 are compared with those of a second expulsion programme in November 1984, following an 11-month period of reinfection. The prevalence of Enterobius infection was consistently high in all age groups of both males and females. A comparison of the overall prevalence and intensity of infection in the January and November surveys revealed significant increases in both the percent infected and the mean number of worms harboured in November relative to the initial level. No significant trends in the intensity of Enterobius according to host age or sex were detected in either survey. The frequency distribution of Enterobius was found to be highly aggregated in the population as a whole and within age groups. At both sampling dates, the most heavily infected 25% of the community harboured over 90% of the total pinworms recovered. There was a significant pattern within most age groups for individuals to re-acquire worm burdens of a similar magnitude to their initial pre-treatment burdens. Heavy infections were found to be associated with household. A selective or targetted approach to treatment of heavily infected individuals or households is likely to be an efficient means of reducing parasite abundance on a community-wide basis. It must be stressed, however, that treatment must be applied at frequent intervals in order to achieve a long-term reduction in pinworm abundance and to avoid the possibility of increasing the intensity of infection, as was observed in this community.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , October 1987 , pp. 339 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akagi, K. (1973). Enterobius vermicularis and enterobiasis. In Progress in Medical Parasitology in Japan, vol. 5. (ed. Morishita, K.et al.). Meguro Parasitological Museum.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. (1985). Helminth infections of humans: Mathematical models, population dynamics and control. Advances in Parasitology 24, 1–101.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. M. & Medley, G. F. (1985). Community control of helminth infections of man by mass and selective chemotherapy. Parasitology 90, 629–60.Google Scholar
Behnke, J. M. (1975). Aspiculuris tetraptera in wild Mus musculus. The prevalence of infection in male and female mice. Journal of Helminthology 49, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bliss, C. A. & Fisher, R. A. (1953). Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data and a note on the efficient fitting of the negative binomial. Biometrics 9, 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bumbalo, T. S., Fugazgotto, D. J. & Wyczalek, J. V. (1969). Treatment of enterobiasis with pyrantel pamoate. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 18, 50–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bundy, D. A. P., Cooper, E. S., Thompson, D. E., Didier, J. M., Anderson, R. M., Simmons, I. (1987). Predisposition to Trichuris trichiura infection in humans. Epidemiology and Infection (in the Press).Google Scholar
Chai, J. Y., Cho, S. Y., Kang, S. Y. & Seo, B. S. (1976). Frequency distribution of Enterobius vermicularis in a highly endemic population. Korean Journal of Parasitology 14, 103–8.Google Scholar
Cho, S. Y. & Kang, S. Y. (1975). Significance of scotch-tape anal swab technique in diagnosis of Enterobius vermicularis infection. Korean Journal of Parasitology 13, 102–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, S. Y., Hong, S. T., Kang, S. Y. & Song, C. Y. (1981). Morphological observation of Enterobius vermicularis expelled by various anthelmintics. Korean Journal of Parasitology 19, 18–26.Google Scholar
Cho, S. Y., Kang, S. Y., Ryang, Y. S. & Seo, B. S. (1976). Relationships between the results of repeated anal swab examinations and worm burden of Enterobius vermicularis. Korean Journal of Parasitology 14, 109–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chobanov, R. E. & Salekhov, A. A. (1979). [Spread of enterobiasis among the rural and urban populations at Azerbaijani S.S.R.]. Meditsinskaya Parazitologiya i Parazitarnye Boleznie 48, 79–83. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Cram, E. B. & Reardon, L. (1939). Studies on oxyuriasis. XII. Epidemiological findings in Washington, D.C. American Journal of Hygiene 29, 17–24.Google Scholar
Elkins, D. B., Haswell-Elkins, M. R. & Anderson, R. M. (1986). The epidemiology and control of intestinal helminths in the Pulicat Lake region of Southern India. I. Study design and pre- and post-treatment observations on Ascaris lumbricoides infection. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 80, 774–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, E. C., Russell, P. F. & Jung, R. C. (1970). Craig and Faust's Clinical Parasitology. 8th Edn.Philadelphia: Lea & Fabinger.Google Scholar
Hall, M. C. (1937). Studies on oxyuriasis. I. Types of anal swabs and scrapers, with a description of an improved type of swab. American Journal of Tropical Medicine 17, 445–53.Google Scholar
Haswell-Elkins, M. R., Elkins, D. B. & Anderson, R. M. (1987). Evidence for predisposition in humans to infection with Ascaris, hookworm, Enterobius and Trichuris in a South Indian fishing community. Parasitology 95, 323–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, S., Sato, K., Takada, A., Shirasaka, R., Fukui, M., Sasa, M., Sukigara, H., Hiraki, K. (1959). Studies on the epidemiology of pin worm (Enterobius vermicularis) in Japan. Japanese Journal of Experimental Medicine 29, 213–48.Google Scholar
Kan-Chua, S. P. & Sinniah, D. (1980). Survey of enterobiasis in children admitted to paediatric wards in the university hospital, Kuala Lumpur. In Collected Papers on the Control of Soil-transmitted Helminths vol. 1. Asian Parasite Control Organization, Japan.Google Scholar
Li, S. Y. & Hsu, H. F. (1951). On the frequency distribution of parasitic helminths in their naturally infected hosts. Journal of Parasitology 37, 32–41.Google Scholar
Nolan, M. O. & Reardon, L. (1939). Studies on oxyuriasis. XX. The distribution of the ova of Enterobius vermicularis in household dust. Journal of Parasitology 25, 173–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlowski, Z. S. (1984). Enterobiasis. In Tropical and Geographic Medicine (ed. Warren, K. S. and Mahmoud, A. A. F.), pp. 386–389. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schad, G. A. & Anderson, R. M. (1985). Predisposition to hookworm infection in humans. Science 228, 1537–40.Google Scholar
Schuffner, W. & Swellengrebel, N. B. (1949). Retroinfection in oxyuriasis. A newly discovered mode of infection with Enterobius vermicularis. Journal of Parasitology 35, 138–46.Google Scholar
Seo, B. S., Rim, H. J., Loh, I. K. & Lee, S. H. (1969). Study on the status of helminthic infections in Koreans. Korean Journal of Parasitology 7, 53–70.Google Scholar
Thein-Hlaing, (1985). Ascaris lumbricoides infections in Burma. In Ascariasis and its Public Health Significance (ed. Crompton, D. W. T., Nesheim, M. C. and Pawlowski, Z. S.). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Vajrasthira, S. & Harinasuta, C. (1962). A study of helminthic infection in Thailand. The incidence of enterobiasis in school children and in children of two hospitals in Bangkok. Proceedings of the 9th Pacific Science Congress 17, 256–9.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. D. & Eby, W. C. (1983). Pinworm prevalence in California elementary school children, and diagnostic methods. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 32, 998–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1981). Intestinal protozoan and helminthic infections. WHO Technical Report Series No. 666, ISBN 92–4–120666–7. Geneva.Google Scholar
Yokogawa, M., Kojima, S., Araki, K., Ogawa, K., Nimura, M., Kagei, N. & Kihata, M. (1970). [Mass treatment for enterobiasis vermicularis with pyrantel pamoate]. Japanese Journal of Parasitology 19, 593–7. (In Japanese with English abstract.)Google Scholar