Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Post-genomic progress in helminth parasitology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2020


Paul McVeigh
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 19 Chlorine Gardens, Belfast BT9 5DL, UK
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Helminth parasitology is an important discipline, which poses often unique technical challenges. One challenge is that helminth parasites, particularly those in humans, are often difficult to obtain alive and in sufficient quantities for study; another is the challenge of studying these organisms in vitro – no helminth parasite life cycle has been fully recapitulated outside of a host. Arguably, the key issue retarding progress in helminth parasitology has been a lack of experimental tools and resources, certainly relative to the riches that have driven many parasitologists to adopt free-living model organisms as surrogate systems. In response to these needs, the past 10–12 years have seen the beginnings of helminth parasitology's journey into the ‘omics’ era, with the release of abundant sequencing resources, and the functional genomics tools with which to test biological hypotheses. To reflect this progress, the 2019 Autumn Symposium of the British Society for Parasitology was held in Queen's University Belfast on the topic of ‘post-genomic progress in helminth parasitology’. This issue presents examples of the current state of play in the field, while this editorial summarizes how genomic datasets and functional genomic tools have stimulated impressive recent progress in our understanding of parasite biology.


Type
Editorial
Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Helminths comprise the parasites commonly referred to as ‘worms’, from the phyla Nematoda and Platyhelminthes. These are perhaps most notable for including many parasites of humans, animals and plants, which cause neglected tropical diseases in humans (Hotez, Reference Hotez2018), and economic losses in our agricultural and horticultural production systems (Morgan et al., Reference Morgan, Aziz, Blanchard, Charlier, Charvet, Claerebout, Geldhof, Greer, Hertzberg, Hodgkinson, Höglund, Hoste, Kaplan, Martínez-Valladares, Mitchell, Ploeger, Rinaldi, von Samson-Himmelstjerna, Sotiraki, Schnyder, Skuce, Bartley, Kenyon, Thamsborg, Vineer, de Waal, Williams, van Wyk and Vercruysse2019). In general, these infections are controlled through application of one of several classes of drugs known as anthelmintics, or nematicides in the case of plant-parasitic nematodes. Anthelmintics are most commonly used in mass drug administration programmes for at-risk human communities, and in herd-level treatment of farm animals. Decades of inappropriate use of these compounds has contributed to the global distribution of anthelmintic-resistant parasites. This is most notable in economically important nematode parasites of farm animals; there are farms in the Southern Hemisphere hosting nematodes that are resistant to all available anthelmintics (Kaplan and Vidyashankar, Reference Kaplan and Vidyashankar2012). Vaccines are available only for a couple of species (Claerebout and Geldhof, Reference Claerebout and Geldhof2020), leaving anthelmintics with the major burden of helminth control. Clearly, new and improved control methods are needed for helminth parasites. This need is a major stimulus for helminth parasitology research – through enhanced understanding of parasite biology, we hope to be able to identify new ways to interfere with the survival and virulence of these pathogens. The availability of genome and associated datasets, and a range of molecular tools with which to interrogate and understand these data in the context of worm biology, are therefore all of key importance in our pursuit of new drugs, vaccines and alternative control strategies. The past decade has seen a surge in the availability of such resources, enhancing our ability to interrogate parasite biology and apply that knowledge to helminth control. This Special Issue of Parasitology synthesizes six invited papers associated with the British Society for Parasitology (BSP)'s 2019 Autumn Symposium, each of which focuses on applications of genomic and post-genomic tools to helminth parasitology. In this Editorial, I have highlighted a small selection of the helminth research areas that have been positively influenced by improved datasets and molecular tools.

High quality omics datasets for helminth parasites are a relatively recent development

Prior to the current genomic era, helminths were represented in genetic databases by expressed sequence tags, and a few transcriptomes and shotgun sequence libraries (Foster et al., Reference Foster, Zhang, Jumar and Carlow2005). While these were a useful resource at the time, their worth was compromised by being concentrated in a handful of core species, with the majority of parasites poorly represented. Caenorhabditis elegans, a nematode, was the first metazoan genome to be fully sequenced (C. elegans Sequencing Consortium, 1998), a project from which parasitologists undoubtedly benefitted. Many adopted C. elegans as a surrogate system in which to interrogate parasite biology, either as a model (Hashmi et al., Reference Hashmi, Tawe and Lustigman2001; Holden-Dye and Walker, Reference Holden-Dye and Walker2014), or as a heterologous system in which to express and study parasite genes (first described by Kwa et al., Reference Kwa, Veenstra, Van Dijk and Roos1995). More directly, many of the tools developed in C. elegans to help interrogate that organism's genome [gene silencing with RNA interference (RNAi), genetic transformation with green-fluorescent protein, genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9, for example] were later applied to nematode parasites, in some cases (described below) allowing native functional biology studies in parasites, without the need for extrapolation from a non-parasitic model system. Similarly, efforts have been made to understand flatworm parasites using free-living species such as Schmidtea and Dugesia/Girardia, each of which are well-resourced and tractable experimental systems, although these have never been developed into full-fledged models to the extent of C. elegans (Collins and Newmark, Reference Collins and Newmark2013; Wheeler et al., Reference Wheeler, Agbedanu, Kimber, Ribeiro, Day and Zamanian2015). This may be because, as is described below, Schistosoma mansoni, a flatworm blood fluke parasite and cause of human schistosomiasis, is an extremely tractable experimental system in its own right. Using a native parasite model overcomes the obvious key limitation of employing free-living model systems – that they are not parasitic, and are therefore of limited use in understanding native aspects of parasite biology.

The first helminth parasite genome to be sequenced was that of the filarial nematode Brugia malayi, one of the causes of lymphatic filariasis (Ghedin et al., Reference Ghedin, Wang, Spiro, Caler, Zhao, Crabtree, Allen, Delcher, Guiliano, Miranda-Saavedra, Anguiloli, Creasy, Amedeo, Haas, El-Sayed, Wortman, Feldblyum, Tallon, Schatz, Shumway, Koo, Salzberg, Schobel, Pertea, Pop, White, Barton, Carlow, Crawford, Daub, Dimmic, Estes, Foster, Ganatra, Gregory, Johnson, Jin, Komuniecki, Korf, Kumar, Laney, Li, Li, Lindblom, Lustigman, Ma, Maina, Martin, McCarter, McReynolds, Mitreva, Nutman, Parkinson, Peregrin-Alvarez, Poole, Ren, Saunders, Sluder, Smith, Stanke, Unnasch, Ware, Wei, Weil, Williams, Zhang, Williams, Fraser-Liggett, Slatko, Blaxter and Scott2007), closely followed by the root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita (Abad et al., Reference Abad, Gouzy, Aury, Castagnone-Sereno, Danchin, Deleury, Perfus-Barbeoch, Anthouard, Artiguenave, Blok, Caillaud, Coutinho, Dasilva, De Luca, Deau, Esquibet, Flutre, Goldstone, Hamamouch, Hewzi, Jaillon, Jubin, Leonetti, Magliano, Maier, Markov, McVeigh, Pesole, Poulain, Robinson-Rechavi, Sallet, Segurens, Strinbach, Tytgat, Ugarte, van Ghelder, Veronico, Baum, Blaxter, Bleve-Zacheo, Davis, Ewbank, Favery, Grenier, Henrissat, Jones, Laudet, Maule, Quesneville, Rosso, Schiex, Smant, Weissenbach and Wincker2008), and the human blood flukes S. mansoni and Schistosoma japonicum (Berriman et al., Reference Berriman, Haas, LoVerde, Wilson, Dillon, Cerqueira, Mashiyama, Al-Lazikani, Andrade, Ashton, Aslett, Bartholomeu, Blandin, Caffrey, Coghlan, Coulson, Day, Delcher, DeMarco, Djikeng, Eyre, Gamble, Ghedin, Gu, Hertz-Fowler, Harai, Hirai, Houston, Ivens, Johnston, Lacerda, Macedo, McVeigh, Ning, Oliveira, Overington, Parkhill, Pertea, Pierce, Protasio, Quail, Rajandream, Rogers, Sajid, Salzberg, Stanke, Tivey, White, Williams, Wortman, Wu, Zamanian, Zerlotini, Fraser-Liggett, Barrell and El-Sayed2009; Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Zheng, Chen, Zhang, Wang, Guo, Huang, Zhang, Huang, Jin, Tonghai, Hasegawa, Wang, Zhang, Zhou, Tao, Cao, Li, Vinar, Brejova, Brown, Li, Miller, Blair, Zhong, Chen, Liu, Hu, Wang, Zhang, Song, Chen, Xu, Xu, Ju, Cheng, Brindley, McManus, Feng, Han, Lu, Ren, Wang, Gu, Kang, Chen, Chen, Chen, Wang, Yan, Wang, Lv, Jin, Wang, Pu, Zhang, Zhang, Hu, Zhu, Wang, Yu, Wang, Yang, Ning, Beriman, Wei, Ruan, Zhao and Wang2009). In the 10 years since, we now have access to high-quality genome data for 81 species of parasitic nematode, and 31 species of parasitic flatworm (WormBase ParaSite release WBPS14; Howe et al., Reference Howe, Bolt, Shafie, Kersey and Berriman2017). These genomes have accelerated studies in each individual species, and also supported large-scale comparative approaches for identifying the evolutionary strategies common to helminth parasitism (Zarowiecki and Berriman, Reference Zarowiecki and Berriman2015; International Helminth Genomes Consortium, 2019). Besides representing important resources in their own right, genome datasets have additional value in supporting the interpretation of other omics datasets. The helminth post-genomic revolution has seen a confluence of expanded genomic data with improved proteomic technologies, where in a two-way relationship, genome-sequencing data have helped to improve protein sequence identification, while proteomics similarly has helped to improve genome annotations (Ruggles et al., Reference Ruggles, Krug, Wang, Clauser, Wang, Payne, Fenyo, Zhang and Mani2017). Importantly, these methods have yielded enhanced understanding of helminth secretomes (i.e. the proportion of the proteome that is secreted by the parasite into the host), augmenting our understanding of helminth immunomodulatory processes and vaccinology (Sotillo et al., Reference Sotillo, Toledo, Mulvenna and Loukas2017). The availability of high-quality genomics datasets has not only enhanced analyses of the protein-coding genome, it has also supported discovery of non-coding (nc)RNAs including micro (mi)RNAs (Fromm et al., Reference Fromm, Ovchinnikov, Hoye, Bernal, Hackenberg and Marcilla2017; Quintana et al., Reference Quintana, Babayan and Buck2017), and long non-coding (lnc)RNAs (Vasconcelos et al., Reference Vasconcelos, DaSilva, Pires, Lavezzo, Pereira, Amaral and Verjovski-Almeida2017; Liao et al., Reference Liao, Zhang, Zhu, Chen, Dong, Tao, He, Liu and Wu2018; Oliveira et al., Reference Oliveira, Moares, Mota, Jannotti-Passos, Coelho, Mattos, Couto, Caffrey, Marsico and Guerra-Sa2018). Although we still have very limited functional data on ncRNAs, it seems reasonable to expect functional insights to flow from the application of functional genomics methods to these sequences.

Functional genomics and reverse genetics – messages in the silence

Functional genomics encompasses the experimental methods that illustrate the phenotypic output of an organism's genotype. These include transcriptomics and proteomics, both of which are used to study aspects of gene expression, and reverse genetics methods, through which we can modify an organism's genome or transcriptome and measure the impact of that manipulation on its phenotype. The development of reverse genetics methodology represented one of the most notable step changes in the history of laboratory-based biological science, revolutionizing our ability to interrogate cellular and organismal functions through induction of targeted transcriptional changes. RNAi mediated by double-stranded (ds)RNA was first developed in C. elegans (Fire et al., Reference Fire, Xu, Montgomery, Kostas, Driver and Mello1998; for which Andrew Fire and Craig Mello were jointly awarded the 2006 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine). RNAi is a gene-silencing method that is now widely adopted across diverse organisms. Triggered by introducing exogenous dsRNA matching the sequence of a target gene, RNAi hijacks endogenous mechanisms to trigger destruction (‘knockdown’) of target transcripts. In C. elegans, this knockdown is specific, can be heritable and triggers suppression of target protein (Ahringer, Reference Ahringer2006), leading to phenotypic changes that can be measured. RNAi has been instrumental in probing the biology of C. elegans, to the point where genome-wide RNAi libraries, capable of knocking down essentially every C. elegans gene, are a freely available community resource (Kamath et al., Reference Kamath, Fraser, Dong, Poulin, Durbin, Gotta, Kanapin, Le Bot, Moreno, Sohrmann, Welchman, Zipperlen and Ahringer2003). While RNAi has not yet been applied at this scale in helminth parasites, it has been employed in several species with varying levels of success (Dalzell et al., Reference Dalzell, Warnock, McVeigh, Marks, Mousley, Atkinson and Maule2012). RNAi is most well advanced in Schistosoma spp. blood fluke, where since first reports in 2003 (Boyle et al., Reference Boyle, Wu, Shoemaker and Yoshino2003; Skelly et al., Reference Skelly, Da'dara and Harn2003) more than 100 publications (at the time of writing) have reported the use of RNAi in S. mansoni or S. japonicum. These include application throughout the schistosome life cycle – in eggs (Rinaldi et al., Reference Rinaldi, Morales, Alrefaei, Cancela, Castillo, Dalton, Tort and Brindley2009), in vitro-derived intra-molluscan larvae (Boyle et al., Reference Boyle, Wu, Shoemaker and Yoshino2003; Dinguirard and Yoshino, Reference Dinguirard and Yoshino2006; Mourão et al., Reference Mourão, Dinguirard, Franco and Yoshino2009a, Reference Mourão, Dinguirard, Franco and Yoshino2009b, Reference Mourão, Bitar, Lobo, Peconick, Grynberg, Prsdocimi, Waisberg, Cerqueria, Macedo, Machado, Yoshino and Franco2013; Taft and Yoshino, Reference Taft and Yoshino2011), in-vitro-maintained intra-mammalian larvae, ex vivo adult parasites (reviewed by Da'dara and Skelly, Reference Da'dara and Skelly2015) and even through intra-venous delivery of RNAi triggers to schistosomes in vivo (Pereira et al., Reference Pereira, Pascoal, Marchesini, Maia, Magalhaes, Zanotti-Magalhaes and Lopes-Cendes2008). In illustrating the application of RNAi to different life cycle stages, these studies highlight the ability to manipulate gene function throughout the many physiologically distinct developmental stages of the schistosome life cycle. This permits in-depth studies of parasite gene function, enabling exploitation of schistosome genome data towards the identification of new treatments for human schistosomiasis. Such research could contribute to the WHO's stated goal of schistosomiasis elimination as a public health issue by 2025 (Deol et al., Reference Deol, Fleming, Calvo-Urbano, Walker, Bucimi, Gnandou, Tukahebwa, Jumu, Mwingira, Alkohlani, Traore, Ruberanziza, Toure, Basanez, French and Webster2019).

Although RNAi is a powerful technique, a key limitation is its inability to generate gain of function (‘knock-in’) alterations. This need is met by the ongoing genome editing revolution, through the application of CRISPR-Cas9 methods to helminths. CRISPR employs components of a prokaryotic adaptive immune system, including a Cas nuclease enzyme, and a guide RNA to target the enzyme's cleavage activity (Jacinto et al., Reference Jacinto, Link and Ferreira2020). When these components are introduced into a eukaryotic system, they can mediate exquisitely precise genome edits. The first applications of CRISPR-Cas9 technology to helminth parasites have described its use in Strongyloides spp. nematodes (Gang et al., Reference Gang, Castelletto, Bryant, Yang, Mancuso, Lopez, Pellegrini and Hallem2017), and in the flatworms S. mansoni (Ittiprasert et al., Reference Ittiprasert, Mann, Larinshak, Coghlan, Rinaldi, Sankaranarayanan, Chaidee, Tanno, Kumkhaek, Prangtaworn, Mentink-Kane, Cochran, Driguez, Holroyd, Tracey, Rodpai, Everts, Hokke, Hoffmann, Berriman and Brindley2019) and Opisthorchis viverrini (Arunsan et al., Reference Arunsan, Ittiprasert, Smout, Cochran, Mann, Chaiyadet, Karinshak, Sripa, Young, Sotillo, Loukas, Brindley and Laha2019). All three of these studies demonstrated the existence of non-homologous end joining mechanisms, enabling specific disruption and knockout of target genes. Homology-directed repair was also employed in Strongyloides and Schistosoma to introduce new genetic information via a repair template (Gang et al., Reference Gang, Castelletto, Bryant, Yang, Mancuso, Lopez, Pellegrini and Hallem2017; Ittiprasert et al., Reference Ittiprasert, Mann, Larinshak, Coghlan, Rinaldi, Sankaranarayanan, Chaidee, Tanno, Kumkhaek, Prangtaworn, Mentink-Kane, Cochran, Driguez, Holroyd, Tracey, Rodpai, Everts, Hokke, Hoffmann, Berriman and Brindley2019). This illustrates the possibility of labelling edited organisms with a marker (such as a fluorescent protein), or introducing an anthelmintic resistance selection gene. These approaches could streamline the selection and analysis of edited individuals. If taken up by the wider community, this suite of genome editing tools should revolutionize our ability to probe and interrogate the biology of helminth parasites, and to identify new control targets in these globally important pathogens.

Anthelmintic resistance – using big data to understand a big problem

Anthelmintics are used worldwide in parasite control programmes for both human and veterinary helminths, where widespread reliance has led to a five-decade struggle against anthelmintic resistance in helminth parasites (Sangster et al., Reference Sangster, Cowling and Woodgate2018). This is a particular problem in veterinary parasites, such that in the Southern Hemisphere it is not uncommon to find sheep/goat farms colonized by nematodes that are resistant to all available anthelmintics (Kaplan and Vidyashankar, Reference Kaplan and Vidyashankar2012). This situation has stimulated much research interest in the mechanisms and markers of selection for anthelmintic resistance (Tinker, Reference Tinker2019; Kaplan, Reference Kaplan2020). Much of the research in these areas has centred on individual drug-resistant candidate genes, selected either from potential anthelmintic targets (Gilleard, Reference Gilleard2006) or from hypotheses around drug deactivation/efflux mechanisms (Matoušková et al., Reference Matoušková, Vokrál, Lamka and Skálová2016; Whittaker et al., Reference Whittaker, Carlson, Jones and Brewer2017). This approach has not been widely successful, probably because of the narrow and limited assumptions upon which candidate gene selection was based (Gilleard, Reference Gilleard2006). The availability of genome data now allows genome wide approaches for studying the genetics of anthelmintic resistance, where phenotypically distinct strains can be compared across the entirety of the genome to identify distinct regions that correlate with resistance (Doyle and Cotton, Reference Doyle and Cotton2019). These regions are known as quantitative trait loci (QTL), and resistance-associated QTL have been identified in Haemonchus contortus in response to benzimidazoles and monepantel (Doyle et al., Reference Doyle, Illingworth, Laing, Bartley, Redman, Martinelli, Holroyd, Morrison, Rezansoff, Tracey, Devaney, Berriman, Sargison, Cotton and Gilleard2019; Niciura et al., Reference Niciura, Tizioto, Moraes, Cruvinel, de Albuquerque, Santana, de Souza Chagas, Esteves, Benavides and do Amarante2019) and to benzimidazoles in C. elegans (Zamanian et al., Reference Zamanian, Cook, Zdraljevic, Brady, Lee, Lee and Andersen2018). These studies have the potential to identify resistance-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms within individual alleles, therefore linking genotype to phenotype. The hope for such data is that they will almost certainly improve our ability to identify drug-resistant genotypes in parasite populations, and they may also assist efforts to overcome resistance (Doyle and Cotton, Reference Doyle and Cotton2019).

Secreted nucleic acids in host–parasite interactions and molecular diagnostics

One promising application of post-genomic tools to diagnostics is the use of RNA sequencing to identify secretion of small non-coding RNAs by helminths. Genome data are an essential element in the identification of ncRNAs, because their discovery hinges upon accurate mapping of millions of short-sequencing reads to a high-quality genome. These mapping data are then computationally analysed for similarity with known ncRNA sequences and/or the prediction of their existence on feasible precursor sequences. Secreted small RNAs, predominantly micro (mi)RNAs, have been reported from 15 helminth species. Since miRNAs are negative regulators of gene expression, the prevailing hypothesis posits that these molecules are released by helminths to modulate the function of host cells, and the host environment, in their favour. This is a relatively newly recognized aspect of the host–parasite interface, which has traditionally been focused on helminth-secreted proteins (Siles-Lucas et al., Reference Siles-Lucas, Morchon, Simon and Manzano-Roman2015; Cai et al., Reference Cai, Gobert and McManus2016; Quintana et al., Reference Quintana, Babayan and Buck2017). We are beginning to see the application of post-genomic tools to test this hypothesis, and indeed the latest evidence supports defined functional roles for helminth-secreted miRNAs in modulation of specific host cell functions (Lin et al., Reference Lin, Zhu, Hu, Wang, Jiang, Zhu, Li, Wang, Zhang, Xu and Pan2019; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Zhu, Wang, Qiu, Chen, Davis and Cheng2019).

Secreted miRNAs are also of obvious appeal as new molecular biomarkers for diagnosis of helminth infections. This appeal comes from the fact that as nucleic acids, they: (i) can be detected with exquisite sensitivity and specificity using polymerase chain reaction (PCR); (ii) are systemically distributed and are detectable in blood and other biofluids and (iii) are generally stable because most are encapsulated in extracellular vesicles (Quintana et al., Reference Quintana, Babayan and Buck2017; Ghalenoei et al., Reference Ghalenoei, Bagheri, Fakhar and Mishan2020). Besides being useful for detecting the presence of parasite infection, dysregulation of host miRNA profiles can identify pathology – for example plasma miRNAs can quantify the extent of liver fibrosis caused by schistosomiasis (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Zhang, Zheng, Chen, Nie, Zheng and Gong2019). Diagnostics is one sub-field of parasitology that stands to benefit appreciably from the genomic revolution, due to the improvements in sensitivity, specificity and throughput that genomic data and tools could bring to diagnostic tests. All of the existing ‘gold standard’ tests for diagnosis of helminth parasites rely on visual identification of helminth life stages in feces, blood or tissue samples, or immunological detection of anti-parasite antibodies (McCarthy et al., Reference McCarthy, Lustigman, Yang, Barakat, Garcia, Sripa, Willingham, Prichard and Basanez2012; Charlier et al., Reference Charlier, de Waele, Ducheyne, van der Voort, Vande Velde and Claerebout2016; Gomez-Morales et al., Reference Gomez-Morales, Garate, Blocher, Devleesschauwer, Smit, Schmidt, Perteguer, Ludovisi, Pozio, Dorny, Gabriel and Winkler2017; Pfister and Van Doorn, Reference Pfister and van Doorn2018). These methods are largely subjective, relatively insensitive and/or are capable of detecting only mature, patent infections. Since many helminth pathologies are the result of infections by larval parasites, the next generation of diagnostic tools must aim to provide early detection of infection. Despite apparent progress in research laboratories, there has been little translation of molecular diagnostic tools into the field (Papaiakovou et al., Reference Papaiakovou, Gasser and Littlewood2019).

Recent years have seen the development of metabarcoding sequence analysis methods, where DNA extracted from a complex mixture is amplified by PCR for phylogenetically informative sequences, such as mitochondrial or ribosomal genes. The resulting amplicons are subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, followed by bioinformatic deconvolution to identify the breadth of sequences (and therefore species) present in the original sample. Metabarcoding has transformed our ability to perform non-invasive biodiversity surveys in terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments (Deiner et al., Reference Deiner, Bik, Machler, Seymour, Lacoursiere-Roussel, Altermatt, Creer, Bista, Lodge, de Vere, Pfrender and Bernatchez2017), and these methods have now been adapted for the speciation of complex mixtures of parasites in fecal samples. The gold standard for the detection of gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep, cattle and goats has, for many decades, been fecal egg counting, where eggs are separated from a homogenized fecal sample by flotation in a sugar or salt solution, then quantified and speciated by microscopy. Many eggs can be speciated by experienced microscopists, but strongylids, one of the major groupings of veterinary gastrointestinal nematodes, cannot be visually distinguished to species level. The traditional solution to this has been to perform a larval development assay, since the third larval stage that develops on pasture after hatching from strongylid eggs do exhibit individual diagnostic morphologies. However, this is a laborious method that relies on highly trained and experienced personnel to perform. Helminth genome data have permitted the adaptation of metabarcoding methods for simple (and automatable) molecular differentiation of strongylid larvae following nematode collection from fecal samples. Through amplification of the ITS-2 ribosomal DNA locus using conserved nematode primer sets, and NGS of those amplicons, accurate quantification of complex parasitic nematode communities is possible. This method is termed ‘nemabiome’ sequencing (Avramenko et al., Reference Avramenko, Redman, Lewis, Yazwinski, Wasmuth and Gilleard2015), first used in the field to illustrate the differences in gut nematode composition between cattle herds in Canada and Brazil, as well as highlighting changes in nematode communities following anthelmintic treatment (Avramenko et al., Reference Avramenko, Redman, Lewis, Bichuette, Palmeira, Yazwinski and Gilleard2017). Nemabiome sequencing has since been used to quantify nematode community composition in Canadian Bison (Avramenko et al., Reference Avramenko, Bras, Redman, Woodbury, Wagner, Shury, Licciolo, Windeyer and Gilleard2018), dairy cows (Scott et al., Reference Scott, Gilleard, Jelinski, Barkema, Redman, Avramenko, Luby, Kelton, Bauman, Keefe, Dubuc and Uehlinger2019a, Reference Scott, Avramenko, Redman, Jelinski, Luby, Henderson, Wagner, Gilleard and Uehlingerb), UK sheep farms (Redman et al., Reference Redman, Queiroz, Bartley, Levy, Avramenko and Gilleard2019) and horses (Mitchell et al., Reference Mitchell, O'Sullivan, Pinloche, Wilkinson, Morphew and McEwan2019). These methods enable high-throughput, objective surveillance of nematode parasite prevalence in veterinary herds, providing molecular support for large-scale parasite prevalence surveys and parasite risk forecasting. Although not yet applied to human parasites, nemabiome sequencing could be useful for epidemiological analysis of soil-transmitted helminth populations in the developing world.

Single-cell transcriptomics

Following the trend for ‘big data’ in biology, the transcriptomics field has now developed methods for sequencing the RNA transcriptome of every cell in a complex cell population containing thousands of individual cells (Hwang et al., Reference Hwang, Lee and Bang2018). Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) generally involves the dissociation of tissues into individual cells, followed by the encapsulation of those cells into individual lipid vesicles containing sequencing reagents and unique molecular barcodes. After cell lysis, library construction and sequencing is performed, with extensive subsequent deconvolution using custom-scripted bioinformatics analyses. This approach allows the elucidation of the transcriptome of every cell in a tissue, organ or entire organism. The resulting datasets can be clustered by cell type, permitting large scale delineation of cell type-specific transcription patterns. These methods are uniquely informative for studies as diverse as developmental biology, transcriptional regulation and stem cell research (Hwang et al., Reference Hwang, Lee and Bang2018). ScRNA-Seq has been applied to large numbers of C. elegans cells (Cao et al., Reference Cao, Packer, Ramani, Cusanovich, Huynh, Daza, Qiu, Lee, Furlan, Steemers, Adey, Waterston, Trapnell and Shendure2017), but has been developed to its highest potential in the acoelomate flatworms, where scRNA-Seq is useful for ‘dissection’ of cell populations, overcoming the considerable technical challenge of physically separating closely packed cells/tissues (Hahnel et al., Reference Hahnel, Lu, Wilson, Grevelding and Quack2013). Reflecting this challenge, the first studies to sequence essentially every cell in a complete metazoan organism were performed in the flatworm model system, S. mediterranea (Fincher et al., Reference Fincher, Wurtzel, de Hoog, Kravarik and Reddien2018; Plass et al., Reference Plass, Solana, Wolf, Ayoub, Misios, Glazar, Obermayer, Theis, Kocks and Rajewsky2018). These datasets are useful for parasitologists since they can inform conserved aspects of flatworm biology, particularly those of nerve, muscle, reproductive and stem cells, all of which are key foci for flatworm parasitologists interested in parasite control. At the time of writing, two studies, both published as pre-prints, have applied scRNA-Seq to S. mansoni, describing 68 distinct cell populations and the majority of the adult parasite's tissue types (Wendt et al., Reference Wendt, Zhao, Chen, Liu, O'Donoghue, Caffrey and Collins2020), and 11 cell types in the schistosomulum, the first intra-mammalian larval stage of the life cycle (Soria et al., Reference Soria, Lee, Chong, Coghlin, Tracey, Young, Andrews, Hall, Ling, Ng, Rawlinson, Doyle, Leonard, Lu, Bennett, Rinaldi, Newmark and Berriman2019). These studies describe comprehensive cellular transcriptional maps for two important stages of the intra-mammalian schistosome life cycle, providing a source of hypotheses and targets for new anti-schistosomal therapeutics.

Conclusions and future perspectives

The surge in availability of genomic tools for helminth parasites has revolutionized our ability to probe the biology of these pathogenic organisms without having to extrapolate from experiments performed in non-parasitic model systems. Genomics and transcriptomic data have provided new insights into the evolution and comparative genomics of helminth parasites, enabled new understanding of anthelmintic resistance and our ability to measure it in the field, new data on molecular interactions between parasites and hosts, and new molecular biomarkers enabling improved helminth diagnostics. We have also seen the development of transcriptomics towards the first applications of single-cell RNA sequencing in whole flatworms. Ongoing development of functional genomics tools allow us to test hypotheses by editing the genomes and transcriptomes of helminth parasites, bringing new depths of understanding around these fascinating and pathogenically important worms. Future work is set to increase the breadth of genomic data available to us, most notably through the Darwin Tree of Life sequencing project, which aims to sequence all 60 000 eukaryotic species in the UK and Ireland (www.darwintreeoflife.org/). Since many of these organisms are helminth parasites, this project will undoubtedly contribute to our understanding of helminth genomes, and support post-genomic progress in many more medically and economically important species.

Acknowledgements

The BSP Autumn Symposium 2019 was sponsored by Analab, Cambridge University Press, Elsevier, Irish Society for Parasitology, Microscope Services and Sales Ltd, Premier Scientific, QUB Core Technology Units, QUB Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences Athena Swan Initiative, and VWR.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.


References

Abad, P, Gouzy, J, Aury, JM, Castagnone-Sereno, P, Danchin, EGJ, Deleury, E, Perfus-Barbeoch, L, Anthouard, V, Artiguenave, F, Blok, VC, Caillaud, MC, Coutinho, PM, Dasilva, C, De Luca, F, Deau, F, Esquibet, M, Flutre, T, Goldstone, JV, Hamamouch, N, Hewzi, T, Jaillon, O, Jubin, C, Leonetti, P, Magliano, M, Maier, TR, Markov, GV, McVeigh, P, Pesole, G, Poulain, J, Robinson-Rechavi, M, Sallet, E, Segurens, B, Strinbach, D, Tytgat, T, Ugarte, E, van Ghelder, C, Veronico, P, Baum, TJ, Blaxter, M, Bleve-Zacheo, T, Davis, EL, Ewbank, JJ, Favery, B, Grenier, E, Henrissat, B, Jones, JT, Laudet, V, Maule, AG, Quesneville, H, Rosso, MN, Schiex, T, Smant, G, Weissenbach, J and Wincker, P (2008) Genome sequence of the metazoan plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Nature Biotechnology 26, 909915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahringer, J (ed.) (2006) Reverse genetics. In WormBook, (ed.), The C. elegans Research Community. WormBook, doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.47.1, Available at http://www.wormbook.org.Google Scholar
Arunsan, P, Ittiprasert, W, Smout, MJ, Cochran, CJ, Mann, VH, Chaiyadet, S, Karinshak, SE, Sripa, B, Young, ND, Sotillo, J, Loukas, A, Brindley, PJ and Laha, T (2019) Programmed knockout of liver fluke granulin attenuates virulence of infection-induced hepatobiliary morbidity. Elife 8, e41463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avramenko, R, Redman, EM, Lewis, R, Yazwinski, TA, Wasmuth, JD and Gilleard, JS (2015) Exploring the gastrointestinal ‘nemabiome’: deep amplicon sequencing to quantify the species composition of parasitic nematode communities. PLoS One 10, e0143559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avramenko, RW, Redman, EM, Lewis, R, Bichuette, MA, Palmeira, BM, Yazwinski, TA and Gilleard, JS (2017) The use of nemabiome metabarcoding to explore gastro-intestinal nematode species diversity and anthelmintic treatment effectiveness in beef calves. International Journal for Parasitology 47, 893902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avramenko, RM, Bras, A, Redman, EM, Woodbury, MR, Wagner, B, Shury, T, Licciolo, S, Windeyer, MC and Gilleard, JS (2018) High species diversity of Trichostrongyle parasite communities within and between Western Canadian commercial and conservation bison herds revealed by nemabiome metabarcoding. Parasites & Vectors 11, 299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berriman, M, Haas, BJ, LoVerde, PT, Wilson, RA, Dillon, GP, Cerqueira, GC, Mashiyama, ST, Al-Lazikani, B, Andrade, LF, Ashton, PD, Aslett, MA, Bartholomeu, DC, Blandin, G, Caffrey, CR, Coghlan, A, Coulson, R, Day, TA, Delcher, A, DeMarco, R, Djikeng, A, Eyre, T, Gamble, JA, Ghedin, E, Gu, Y, Hertz-Fowler, C, Harai, H, Hirai, Y, Houston, R, Ivens, A, Johnston, DA, Lacerda, D, Macedo, CD, McVeigh, P, Ning, Z, Oliveira, G, Overington, JP, Parkhill, J, Pertea, M, Pierce, RJ, Protasio, AV, Quail, MA, Rajandream, MA, Rogers, J, Sajid, M, Salzberg, SL, Stanke, M, Tivey, AR, White, O, Williams, DL, Wortman, J, Wu, W, Zamanian, M, Zerlotini, A, Fraser-Liggett, CM, Barrell, BG and El-Sayed, NM (2009) The genome of the blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni. Nature 460, 352358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyle, JP, Wu, XJ, Shoemaker, CB and Yoshino, TP (2003) Using RNA interference to manipulate endogenous gene expression in Schistosoma mansoni sporocysts. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 128, 205215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cai, P, Gobert, GN and McManus, DP (2016) MicroRNAs in parasitic helminthiases: current status and future perspectives. Trends in Parasitology 32, 7186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, J, Packer, JS, Ramani, V, Cusanovich, DA, Huynh, C, Daza, R, Qiu, X, Lee, C, Furlan, SN, Steemers, FJ, Adey, A, Waterston, RH, Trapnell, C and Shendure, J (2017) Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science (New York, N.Y.) 357, 661667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlier, J, de Waele, V, Ducheyne, E, van der Voort, M, Vande Velde, F and Claerebout, E (2016) Decision making on helminths in cattle: diagnostics, economics and human behaviour. Irish Veterinary Journal 69, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Q, Zhang, J, Zheng, T, Chen, H, Nie, H, Zheng, B and Gong, Q (2019) The role of microRNAs in the pathogenesis, grading and treatment of hepatic fibrosis in schistosomiasis. Parasites & Vectors 12, 611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claerebout, E and Geldhof, P (2020) Helminth vaccines in ruminants: from development to application. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 36, 159171.Google Scholar
Collins, JJ and Newmark, PA (2013) It's no fluke: the planarian as a model for understanding schistosomes. PLoS Pathogens 9, e1003396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Consortium CeS (1998) Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science (New York, N.Y.) 282, 20122018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da'dara, A and Skelly, PJ (2015) Gene suppression in schistosomes using RNAi. Methods in Molecular Biology 1201, 143164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalzell, JJ, Warnock, ND, McVeigh, P, Marks, NJ, Mousley, A, Atkinson, L and Maule, AG (2012) Considering RNAi experimental design in parasitic helminths. Parasitology 139, 589604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deiner, K, Bik, HM, Machler, E, Seymour, M, Lacoursiere-Roussel, A, Altermatt, F, Creer, S, Bista, I, Lodge, DM, de Vere, N, Pfrender, ME and Bernatchez, L (2017) Environmental DNA metabarcoding: transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Molecular Ecology 26, 58725895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deol, AK, Fleming, FM, Calvo-Urbano, B, Walker, M, Bucimi, V, Gnandou, I, Tukahebwa, EM, Jumu, S, Mwingira, UJ, Alkohlani, A, Traore, M, Ruberanziza, E, Toure, S, Basanez, MG, French, MD and Webster, JP (2019) Schistosomiasis – assessing progress toward the 2020 and 2025 global goals. New England Journal of Medicine 381, 25192528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinguirard, N and Yoshino, TP (2006) Potential role of a CD36-like class B scavenger receptor in the binding of modified low-density lipoprotein (acLDL) to the tegumental surface of Schistosoma mansoni sporocysts. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 146, 219230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, SR and Cotton, JA (2019) Genome-wide approaches to investigate anthelmintic resistance. Trends in Parasitology 35, 289301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, SR, Illingworth, CJR, Laing, R, Bartley, DJ, Redman, E, Martinelli, A, Holroyd, N, Morrison, AA, Rezansoff, A, Tracey, A, Devaney, E, Berriman, M, Sargison, N, Cotton, JA and Gilleard, JS (2019) Population genomic and evolutionary modelling analyses reveal a single major QTL for ivermectin drug resistance in the pathogenic nematode, Haemonchus contortus. BMC Genomics 20, 218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincher, CT, Wurtzel, O, de Hoog, T, Kravarik, KM and Reddien, PW (2018) Cell type transcriptome atlas for the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. Science (New York, N.Y.) 360, eaaq1736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fire, A, Xu, S, Montgomery, MK, Kostas, SA, Driver, SE and Mello, CC (1998) Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391, 806811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, JM, Zhang, Y, Jumar, S and Carlow, CKS (2005) Mining nematode genome data for novel drug targets. Trends in Parasitology 21, 101104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fromm, B, Ovchinnikov, V, Hoye, E, Bernal, D, Hackenberg, M and Marcilla, A (2017) On the presence and immunoregulatory functions of extracellular microRNAs in the trematode Fasciola hepatica. Parasite Immunology 39, e12399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gang, SS, Castelletto, ML, Bryant, AS, Yang, E, Mancuso, N, Lopez, JB, Pellegrini, M and Hallem, EA (2017) Targeted mutagenesis in a human–parasitic nematode. PLoS Pathogens 13, e1006675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghalenoei, H, Bagheri, A, Fakhar, M and Mishan, MA (2020) Circulatory microRNAs: promising non-invasive prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers for parasitic infections. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 39, 395402.Google Scholar
Ghedin, E, Wang, S, Spiro, D, Caler, E, Zhao, Q, Crabtree, J, Allen, JE, Delcher, AL, Guiliano, DB, Miranda-Saavedra, D, Anguiloli, SV, Creasy, T, Amedeo, P, Haas, B, El-Sayed, NM, Wortman, KR, Feldblyum, T, Tallon, L, Schatz, M, Shumway, M, Koo, H, Salzberg, SL, Schobel, S, Pertea, M, Pop, M, White, O, Barton, GJ, Carlow, CKS, Crawford, MJ, Daub, J, Dimmic, MW, Estes, CF, Foster, JM, Ganatra, M, Gregory, WF, Johnson, NM, Jin, J, Komuniecki, R, Korf, I, Kumar, S, Laney, S, Li, BW, Li, W, Lindblom, TH, Lustigman, S, Ma, D, Maina, CV, Martin, DMA, McCarter, JP, McReynolds, L, Mitreva, M, Nutman, TB, Parkinson, J, Peregrin-Alvarez, JM, Poole, C, Ren, Q, Saunders, L, Sluder, AE, Smith, K, Stanke, M, Unnasch, TR, Ware, J, Wei, AD, Weil, G, Williams, DJ, Zhang, Y, Williams, SA, Fraser-Liggett, CF, Slatko, B, Blaxter, ML and Scott, AL (2007) Draft genome of the filarial nematode parasite Brugia malayi. Science (New York, N.Y.) 317, 17561760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilleard, JS (2006) Understanding anthelmintic resistance: the need for genomics and genetics. International Journal for Parasitology 36, 12271239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomez-Morales, MA, Garate, T, Blocher, J, Devleesschauwer, B, Smit, GSA, Schmidt, V, Perteguer, MJ, Ludovisi, A, Pozio, E, Dorny, P, Gabriel, S and Winkler, AS (2017) Present status of laboratory diagnosis of human taeniosis/cysticercosis in Europe. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 36, 20292040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahnel, S, Lu, Z, Wilson, RA, Grevelding, CG and Quack, T (2013) Whole-organ isolation approach as a basis for tissue-specific analyses in Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, e2336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashmi, S, Tawe, W and Lustigman, S (2001) Caenorhabditis elegans and the study of gene function in parasites. Trends in Parasitology 17, 387393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden-Dye, L and Walker, RJ (2014) Anthelmintic drugs and nematicides: studies in Caenorhabditis elegans. In WormBook (ed.), The C. elegans Research Community. WormBook, doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.143.2, Available at http://www.wormbook.org.Google Scholar
Hotez, PJ (2018) Human parasitology and parasitic diseases: heading towards 2050. Advances in Parasitology 100, 2938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howe, KL, Bolt, BJ, Shafie, M, Kersey, P and Berriman, M (2017) Wormbase ParaSite – a comprehensive resource for helminth genomics. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 215, 210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, B, Lee, JH and Bang, D (2018) Single-cell RNA sequencing technologies and bioinformatics pipelines. Experimental & Molecular Medicine 50, 96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Helminth Genomes Consortium (2019) Comparative genomics of the major parasitic worms. Nature Genetics 51, 163174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ittiprasert, W, Mann, VH, Larinshak, SE, Coghlan, A, Rinaldi, G, Sankaranarayanan, G, Chaidee, A, Tanno, T, Kumkhaek, C, Prangtaworn, P, Mentink-Kane, MM, Cochran, CJ, Driguez, P, Holroyd, N, Tracey, A, Rodpai, R, Everts, B, Hokke, CH, Hoffmann, KF, Berriman, M and Brindley, PJ (2019) Programmed genome editing of the omega-1 ribonuclease of the blood fluke, Schistosoma mansoni. Elife 8, e41337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacinto, FV, Link, W and Ferreira, BI (2020) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing: from basic research to translational medicine. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 24, 37663778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamath, RS, Fraser, AG, Dong, Y, Poulin, G, Durbin, R, Gotta, M, Kanapin, A, Le Bot, N, Moreno, S, Sohrmann, M, Welchman, DP, Zipperlen, P and Ahringer, J (2003) Systemic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421, 231237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, RM (2020) Biology, epidemiology, diagnosis and management of anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes of livestock. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 36, 1730.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, RM and Vidyashankar, AN (2012) An inconvenient truth: global warming and anthelmintic resistance. Veterinary Parasitology 186, 7078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwa, MS, Veenstra, JG, Van Dijk, M and Roos, MH (1995) Beta-tubulin genes from the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus modulate drug resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Molecular Biology 246, 500510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, Q, Zhang, Y, Zhu, Y, Chen, J, Dong, C, Tao, Y, He, A, Liu, J and Wu, Z (2018) Identification of long noncoding RNAs in Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma japonicum. Experimental Parasitology 191, 8287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, Y, Zhu, S, Hu, C, Wang, J, Jiang, P, Zhu, L, Li, Z, Wang, S, Zhang, Y, Xu, X and Pan, W (2019) Cross-species suppression of hepatoma cell growth and migration by a Schistosoma japonicum microRNA. Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids 18, 400412.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, J, Zhu, L, Wang, J, Qiu, L, Chen, Y, Davis, RE and Cheng, G (2019) Schistosoma japonicum extracellular vesicle miRNA cargo regulates host macrophage functions facilitating parasitism. PLoS Pathogens 15, e1007817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matoušková, P, Vokrál, I, Lamka, J and Skálová, L (2016). The role of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes in anthelmintic deactivation and resistance in helminths. Trends in Parasitology 32, 481491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, JS, Lustigman, S, Yang, GJ, Barakat, RM, Garcia, HH, Sripa, B, Willingham, AL, Prichard, RK and Basanez, MG (2012) A research agenda for helminth diseases of humans: diagnostics for control and elimination programmes. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, e1601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, CJ, O'Sullivan, CM, Pinloche, E, Wilkinson, T, Morphew, RM and McEwan, NR (2019) Using next-generation sequencing to determine diversity of horse intestinal worms: identifying the equine ‘nemabiome’. Journal of Equine Science 30, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, ER, Aziz, NA, Blanchard, A, Charlier, J, Charvet, C, Claerebout, E, Geldhof, P, Greer, AW, Hertzberg, H, Hodgkinson, J, Höglund, J, Hoste, H, Kaplan, RM, Martínez-Valladares, M, Mitchell, S, Ploeger, HW, Rinaldi, L, von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G, Sotiraki, S, Schnyder, M, Skuce, P, Bartley, D, Kenyon, F, Thamsborg, SM, Vineer, HR, de Waal, T, Williams, AR, van Wyk, JA and Vercruysse, J (2019) 100 questions in livestock helminthology research. Trends in Parasitology 35, 5271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mourão, MM, Dinguirard, N, Franco, GR and Yoshino, TP (2009 a) Phenotypic screen of early-developing larvae of the blood fluke, Schistosoma mansoni, using RNA interference. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 3, e502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mourão, MM, Dinguirard, N, Franco, GR and Yoshino, TP (2009 b) Role of the endogenous antioxidant system in the protection of Schistosoma mansoni primary sporocysts against exogenous oxidative stress. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 3, e550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourão, MM, Bitar, M, Lobo, FP, Peconick, AP, Grynberg, P, Prsdocimi, F, Waisberg, M, Cerqueria, GC, Macedo, AM, Machado, CR, Yoshino, T and Franco, GR (2013) A directed approach for the identification of transcripts harbouring the spliced leader sequence and he effect of trans-splicing knockdown in Schistosoma mansoni. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 108, 707717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niciura, SCM, Tizioto, PC, Moraes, CV, Cruvinel, GG, de Albuquerque, ACA, Santana, RCM, de Souza Chagas, AC, Esteves, SN, Benavides, MV and do Amarante, AFT (2019) Extreme-QTL mapping of monepantel resistance in Haemonchus contortus. Parasites & Vectors 12, 403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, VF, Moares, LAG, Mota, EA, Jannotti-Passos, LK, Coelho, PMZ, Mattos, ACA, Couto, FFB, Caffrey, BE, Marsico, A and Guerra-Sa, R (2018) Identification of 170 new long noncoding RNAs in Schistosoma mansoni. BioMed Research International 2018, 1264697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papaiakovou, M, Gasser, RB and Littlewood, DTJ (2019) Quantitative PCR-based diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminth infections: faecal or fickle? Trends in Parasitology 35, 491500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, TC, Pascoal, VDB, Marchesini, RB, Maia, IG, Magalhaes, LA, Zanotti-Magalhaes, EM and Lopes-Cendes, I (2008) Schistosoma mansoni: evaluation of an RNAi-based treatment targeting HGPRTase gene. Experimental Parasitology 118, 619623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfister, K and van Doorn, D (2018) New perspectives in equine intestinal parasitic disease: insights in monitoring helminth infections. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 34, 141153.Google ScholarPubMed
Plass, M, Solana, J, Wolf, FA, Ayoub, S, Misios, A, Glazar, P, Obermayer, B, Theis, FJ, Kocks, C and Rajewsky, N (2018) Cell type atlas and lineage tree of a whole complex animal by single-cell transcriptomics. Science (New York, N.Y.) 360, eaaq1723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintana, JF, Babayan, SA and Buck, AH (2017) Small RNAs and extracellular vesicles in filarial nematodes: from nematode development to diagnostics. Parasite Immunology 39, e12395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redman, E, Queiroz, C, Bartley, DJ, Levy, M, Avramenko, RW and Gilleard, JS (2019) Validation of ITS-2 rDNA nemabiome sequencing for ovine gastrointestinal nematodes and its application to a large scale survey of UK sheep farms. Veterinary Parasitology 275, 108933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinaldi, G, Morales, ME, Alrefaei, YN, Cancela, M, Castillo, E, Dalton, JP, Tort, JF and Brindley, PJ (2009) RNA Interference targeting leucine aminopeptidase blocks hatching of Schistosoma mansoni eggs. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 167, 118126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruggles, KV, Krug, K, Wang, X, Clauser, KR, Wang, J, Payne, SH, Fenyo, D, Zhang, B and Mani, DR (2017) Methods, tools and current perspectives in proteogenomics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 16, 959981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sangster, NC, Cowling, A and Woodgate, RG (2018) Ten events that defined anthelmintic resistance research. Trends in Parasitology 34, 553563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, H, Gilleard, JS, Jelinski, M, Barkema, HW, Redman, EM, Avramenko, RW, Luby, C, Kelton, DF, Bauman, CA, Keefe, G, Dubuc, J and Uehlinger, FD (2019 a) Prevalence, fecal egg counts, and species identification of gastrointestinal nematodes in replacement dairy heifers in Canada. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 82518263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, H, Avramenko, R, Redman, E, Jelinski, M, Luby, C, Henderson, T, Wagner, B, Gilleard, J and Uehlinger, F (2019 b) Survey of gastrointestinal nematodes in breeding-age heifers on 6 Saskatchewan dairy farms. Canadian Veterinary Journal 60, 13421348.Google ScholarPubMed
Siles-Lucas, M, Morchon, R, Simon, F and Manzano-Roman, R (2015) Exosome-transported microRNAs of helminth origin: new tools for allergic and autoimmune diseases therapy? Parasite Immunology 37, 208214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skelly, PJ, Da'dara, A and Harn, DA (2003) Suppression of cathepsin B expression in Schistosoma mansoni by RNA interference. International Journal for Parasitology 33, 363369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soria, CLD, Lee, J, Chong, T, Coghlin, A, Tracey, A, Young, MD, Andrews, T, Hall, C, Ling, B, Ng, L, Rawlinson, K, Doyle, SR, Leonard, S, Lu, Z, Bennett, HM, Rinaldi, G, Newmark, PA and Berriman, M (2019) Single-cell atlas of the first intra-mammalian developmental stage of the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni. bioRxiv 754713; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/754713Google Scholar
Sotillo, J, Toledo, R, Mulvenna, J and Loukas, A (2017) Exploiting helminth–host interactomes through big data. Trends in Parasitology 33, 875888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taft, AS and Yoshino, TP (2011) Cloning and functional characterization of two calmodulin genes during larval development in the parasitic flatworm Schistosoma mansoni. Journal of Parasitology 97, 7281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinker, SH (2019) Preventative chemotherapy and anthelmintic resistance of soil-transmitted helminths – can we learn nothing from veterinary medicine? One Health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 9, 100106.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, EJR, DaSilva, LF, Pires, DS, Lavezzo, GM, Pereira, ASA, Amaral, MS and Verjovski-Almeida, S (2017) The Schistosoma mansoni genome encodes thousands of long non-coding RNAs predicted to be functional at different parasite life-cycle stages. Scientific Reports 7, 10508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wendt, G, Zhao, L, Chen, R, Liu, C, O'Donoghue, AJ, Caffrey, CR and Collins, JJ (2020) A single-cell RNAseq atlas of the pathogenic stage of Schistosoma mansoni identifies a key regulator of blood feeding. bioRxiv 2020.02.03.932004; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.03.932004Google Scholar
Wheeler, NJ, Agbedanu, PN, Kimber, MJ, Ribeiro, P, Day, TA and Zamanian, M (2015) Functional analysis of Girardia tigrine transcriptome seeds pipeline for anthelmintic target discovery. Parasites & Vectors 8, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, JH, Carlson, SA, Jones, DE and Brewer, MT (2017) Molecular mechanisms for anthelmintic resistance in Strongyle nematode parasites of veterinary importance. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 40, 105115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamanian, M, Cook, DE, Zdraljevic, S, Brady, SC, Lee, D, Lee, J and Andersen, EC (2018) Discovery of genomic intervals that underlie nematode responses to benzimidazoles. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 12, e0006368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zarowiecki, M and Berriman, M (2015) What helminth genomes have taught us about parasite evolution. Parasitology 142(Suppl 1), S85S97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Y, Zheng, H, Chen, X, Zhang, L, Wang, K, Guo, J, Huang, Z, Zhang, B, Huang, W, Jin, K, Tonghai, D, Hasegawa, M, Wang, L, Zhang, Y, Zhou, J, Tao, L, Cao, Z, Li, Y, Vinar, T, Brejova, B, Brown, D, Li, M, Miller, DJ, Blair, D, Zhong, Y, Chen, Z, Liu, F, Hu, W, Wang, ZQ, Zhang, QH, Song, HD, Chen, S, Xu, X, Xu, B, Ju, Z, Cheng, Y, Brindley, PJ, McManus, DP, Feng, Z, Han, ZG, Lu, G, Ren, S, Wang, Y, Gu, W, Kang, H, Chen, J, Chen, X, Chen, S, Wang, L, Yan, J, Wang, B, Lv, X, Jin, L, Wang, B, Pu, S, Zhang, X, Zhang, W, Hu, Q, Zhu, G, Wang, J, Yu, J, Wang, J, Yang, H, Ning, Z, Beriman, M, Wei, CL, Ruan, Y, Zhao, G and Wang, S (2009) The Schistosoma japonicum genome reveals festures of host–parasite interplay. Nature 460, 345351.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 37
Total number of PDF views: 386 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 07th April 2020 - 29th November 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access
Open access
Hostname: page-component-8465588854-gsl7t Total loading time: 0.739 Render date: 2020-11-29T11:10:15.401Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "1", "openAccess": "1", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Sun Nov 29 2020 10:31:22 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Post-genomic progress in helminth parasitology
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Post-genomic progress in helminth parasitology
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Post-genomic progress in helminth parasitology
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *