Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-j5sqr Total loading time: 0.476 Render date: 2022-10-05T09:10:40.823Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Americans' Social Policy Preferences in the Era of Rising Inequality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2009

Leslie McCall
Affiliation:
Northwestern University. E-mail: l-mccall@northwestern.edu
Lane Kenworthy
Affiliation:
University of Arizona. E-mail: lane.kenworthy@arizona.edu

Abstract

Rising income inequality has been a defining trend of the past generation, yet we know little about its impact on social policy formation. We evaluate two dominant views about public opinion on rising inequality: that Americans do not care much about inequality of outcomes, and that a rise in inequality will lead to an increase in demand for government redistribution. Using time series data on views about income inequality and social policy preferences in the 1980s and 1990s from the General Social Survey, we find little support for these views. Instead, Americans do tend to object to inequality and increasingly believe government should act to redress it, but not via traditional redistributive programs. We examine several alternative possibilities and provide a broad analytical framework for reinterpreting social policy preferences in the era of rising inequality. Our evidence suggests that Americans may be unsure or uninformed about how to address rising inequality and thus swayed by contemporaneous debates. However, we also find that Americans favor expanding education spending in response to their increasing concerns about inequality. This suggests that equal opportunity may be more germane than income redistribution to our understanding of the politics of inequality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, Alberto, Di Tella, Rafael, and MacCulloch, Robert. 2004. Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics 88: 2009–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
APSA Task Force. 2004. American democracy in an age of rising inequality. Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 651–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2005. Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics 3 (1): 1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy. Princeton and New York: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Berensky, Adam J. 2002. Silent voices: Social welfare policy opinions and political equality in America. American Journal of Political Science 46: 276–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert. 1976. Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowman, Karlyn H. 2000. “No Din Over Dollar Divide.” Chicago Sun-Times, July 31.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2007. “What Americans Think of Taxes.” Presented at the Conference on Taxation in Comparative and Historical Perspective, Northwestern University, May 4–5.Google Scholar
Cunha, Flavio, Heckman, James, and Navarro, Salvador. 2006. Counterfactual analysis of inequality and social mobility. In Mobility and inequality, ed. Morgan, S., Grusky, D., and Fields, G.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
DiNardo, John, Fortin, Nicole M., and Lemieux, Thomas. 1996. Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1992: A semiparametric approach. Econometrica 64: 1001–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1982. Economic self-interest and political behavior. American Journal of Political Science 26: 446–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1987. Evaluation of new inequality items. 1987 NES Pilot Study Report.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1988. Structure and consistency in public opinion: the role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science 32: 416–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Steenbergen, Marco R.. 2001. The humanitarian foundation of public support for welfare. American Journal of Political Science 45: 658–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Zaller, John. 1992. The political culture of ambivalence: ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science 36: 268307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, Lloyd, and Cantril, Hadley. 1968. The Political Beliefs of Americans. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Freeman, Richard B., and Rogers, Joel. 1999. What Workers Want. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschalk, Peter, and Danziger, Sheldon. 2005. Inequality of wage rates, earnings, and family income in the United States, 1975–2002. Review of Income and Wealth 51: 231254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Stanley B. 1996. Private heroism and public purpose. American Prospect 7 (28): 3440.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob. 2006. The Great Risk Shift. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander. 1999. Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer. 1981. What's Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer. 1995. Facing Up to the American Dream. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inequality, and the American dream. 2006. The Economist. June 17–23: 2830.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence, and Skocpol, Theda. 2005. Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Sanford. 1997. Modern Manors: Welfare Capitalism Since the New Deal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jencks, Christopher, Bartlett, Susan, Corcoran, Mary, Crouse, James, Eaglesfield, David, Jackson, Gregory, McClelland, Kent, Mueser, Peter, Olneck, Michael, Schwartz, Joseph, Ward, Sherry, and Williams, Jill. 1979. Who Gets Ahead? The Determinants of Economic Success in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Katz, Lawrence F., and Murphy, Kevin. 1992. Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: Supply and demand factors. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 3578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Michael. 1989. The Undeserving Poor: From the War on Poverty to the War on Welfare. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, and McCall, Leslie. 2008. Inequality, public opinion, and redistribution. Socio-Economic Review 6: 3568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2005. Rising inequality and the politics of redistribution in affluent countries. Perspectives on Politics 3 (3): 449–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluegal, James R., and Smith, Eliot R.. 1986. Beliefs about Inequality: Americans' Views about What Is and What Ought To Be. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kluegal, James R., Mason, David S., and Wegener, Bernd, eds. 1995. Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 2007. The Conscience of a Liberal. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ladd, Carll Everett, and Bowman, Karlyn H.. 1998. Attitudes Toward Economic Inequality. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E. 1986. Market justice, political justice. American Political Science Review 80 (2): 383402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Frank, and Murnane, Richard. 1992. U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature 30 (2): 1333–81.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1996. American Exceptionalism. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Matusow, Allen J. 1984. The Unraveling of America: A History of Liberalism in the 1960s. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
McCall, Leslie, and Kenworthy, Lane. 2009. “Explaining Americans' Beliefs about Income Inequality.” Unpublished ms. Department of Sociology, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Herbert, and Zaller, John. 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, Lawrence M. 2004. The great passivity. Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 671–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 89: 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2007. The transformed welfare state and the redistribution of political voice. In The Transformation of American Politics, ed. Pierson, P. and Skocpol, T.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mishel, Lawrence, Bernstein, Jared, and Allegretto, Sylvia. 2007. The State of Working America, 2006/2007. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Moene, Karl Ove, and Wallerstein, Michael. 2001. Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution. American Political Science Review 95 (4): 859–74.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Robert, Ribar, David, and Wilhelm, Mark. 1998. The decline of welfare benefits in the U.S.: The role of wage inequality. Journal of Public Economics 68: 421–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly J. 2005. “Financing the Welfare State: US Tax Politics in Comparative Perspective.” Unpublished ms., Department of Political Science, George Washington University.Google Scholar
Murphy, Kevin J. 1997. Executive compensation and modern industrial revolution. International Journal of Industrial Organization 15: 417–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2009. Class War? What Americans Really Think about Economic Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2007. “Trends in political values and core attitudes: 1987–2007.” Available at: http://www.people-press.org.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2003. Income inequality in the United States: 1911–1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2007. Income and wage inequality in the United States, 1913–2002. In Top Incomes over the Twentieth Century, ed. Atkinson, Anthony B. and Piketty, Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saris, Willem E., and Sniderman, Paul M., eds. 2004. Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Slaughter, Matthew. 2006. Public opinion, international economic integration, and the welfare state. In Globalization and egalitarian redistribution, ed. Bowles, S., Bardhan, P., and Wallerstein, M.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay L., Page, Benjamin I., Verba, Sidney, and Fiorina, Morris. 2005. Inequalities of political voice. In Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn, ed. Jacobs, L. and Skocpol, T.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Schneider, Sandra K., and Jacoby, William G.. 2005. Elite discourse and American public opinion: The case of welfare spending. Political Research Quarterly 58: 367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Bullock, John. 2004. A consistency theory of public opinion and political choice: The hypothesis of menu dependence. In Studies in Public Opinion, ed. Saris, W. and Sniderman, P.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe, and Schram, Sanford F.. 2007. A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political Science Review 101 (1): 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco R., and Brewer, Paul R.. 2004. The not-so-ambivalent public: Policy attitudes in the political culture of ambivalence. In Studies in public opinion, ed. Saris, W. and Sniderman, P.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Ruy, and Rogers, Joel. 2000. America's Forgotten Majority: Why the White Working Class Still Matters. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, and Orren, Gary. 1985. Equality in America: The View from the Top. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Edward N. 2006. Does Education Really Help? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 2004. Floating voters in U.S. presidential elections, 1948–2000. In Studies in Public Opinion, ed. Saris, W. and Sniderman, P.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
97
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Americans' Social Policy Preferences in the Era of Rising Inequality
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Americans' Social Policy Preferences in the Era of Rising Inequality
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Americans' Social Policy Preferences in the Era of Rising Inequality
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *