Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-6g96d Total loading time: 0.204 Render date: 2022-07-06T07:10:47.849Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Gender, Diversity, and Organizational Change: The Boy Scouts vs. Girl Scouts of America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Barbara Arneil
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia. E-mail: arneil@interchange.ubc.ca

Abstract

After growing for decades, the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts both experienced a dramatic drop in membership during the 1970s. Since then their membership patterns have diverged as the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) continues to decline and the Girl Scouts of the USA (GSUSA) has reached near record numbers. These patterns raise two questions: Why the decline? And why the divergence? On the cause of decline, I argue that a younger civil rights generation, informed by a new set of post-materialist values, did not join traditional organizations like the BSA and GSUSA because their values were deemed to be outdated. The challenge for traditional organizations therefore was how to respond. Using path dependency theory, I argue that BSA and GSUSA—shaped by their own unique origins and identities—responded very differently to the critical juncture of the civil rights generation, which in turn explains the subsequent divergence in membership patterns from the 1980s onward. While the BSA rejects such changes in order to defend traditional values, the GSUSA, which established a commitment to challenging gender norms from its birth, embraces the new values and adapts virtually every aspect of its organizational identity to this new generation. As young people see themselves reflected back in the values endorsed by the GSUSA, its membership resurges, while the BSA continues to decline. I conclude by drawing out larger theoretical lessons on the meaning of change in American civil society in light of an increasingly diverse population.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

African American Registry. 2009. http://www.aaregistry.com/detail.php?id=2781, accessed September 2009.Google Scholar
Arneil, Barbara. 1999. Politics and Feminism. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Arneil, Barbara. 2006. Diverse Communities: The Problem with Social Capital. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auster, Carol J. 1985. Manuals for Socialization: Examples from Girl Scout Handbooks 1913–1984 Qualitative Sociology: 8 (4): 359–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baden-Powell, Robert. 2004. Scouting for Boys, First Edition, 1908. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 2002. Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bensman, Todd. 2000. “Scout Exec Admits Rolls Falsified—Official signed Rosters Under Orders, Lawyer Says.” The Dallas Morning News, May 24.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Bill. 2001. Girl Scouts on the Firing Line. Lesbian News 27 (4): 52–4.Google Scholar
Block, Nelson R. 1993. “William Harcourt: Scoutmaster to the World.” The Journal of Scouting History. http://www.trussel.com/prehist/crump/hillcour.htm, accessed September, 2009.Google Scholar
Blum, Debra. 2006. Boy Scouts Lose Battle in California's High Court. The Chronicle of Philanthropy 18 (12): 55.Google Scholar
Boy Scouts of America National Council. 2002. “BSA Board Affirms Traditional Leadership Values.” February 6. http://www.scouting.org/Media/PressReleases/2002/020206.aspxGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, David. 2000. “Scout Council Defies Homosexual Ban.” World Net Daily, October 11. http://www.wnd.com/index.php/index.php?pageId=484Google Scholar
Cappocia, Giovanni, and Klemen, R. Daniel. 2007. The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics 59 (3): 341369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, The Labour Movement and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Colloredo-Mansfeld, Rudi 1998. ‘Dirty Indians,’ Radical Indígenas, and the Political Economy of Social Difference in Modern Ecuador. Bulletin of Latin American Research 17 (2): 185205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deloria, Philip J. 1999. Playing Indian. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Donohue, William. 1994. Culture Wars against the Boy Scouts. Culture and Society 31 (May–June): 5968.Google Scholar
Driedger, Leo, and Mezoff, Richard. 1981. Ethnic Prejudice and Discrimination in Winnipeg Schools. Canadian Journal of Sociology 6 (1): 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, David. 2001. “Scouts Divided.” Newsweek August 6: 44–56.Google Scholar
Girl Guides of Canada. 2008. “History of Guiding.” http://www.girlguides.ca/default1.asp?ID=1183, accessed March 15, 2008.Google Scholar
Girl Scouts of the USA. n/d. “Juliette Gordon Low Biography.” http://www.girlscouts.org/who_we_are/history/low_biography/, accessed October 2009.Google Scholar
Girl Scouts of the USA 2000. Annual Report. New York: Girl Scouts of the USA.Google ScholarPubMed
Girl Scouts of the USA. 2001. “News Release.” January 11. http://www.girlscouts.org, accessed June, 2002.Google Scholar
Girl Scouts of the USA. 2003. Annual Report. New York: Girl Scouts of the USA.Google ScholarPubMed
Girl Scouts of the USA. 2004. “Kathy Cloninger Celebrates First Anniversary as CEO.” October 24. http://www.girlscouts.org/news/stories/2004/cloninger_anniversary.asp, accessed October, 2009.Google Scholar
Girl Scouts of the USA. 2007a. The Architecture of Inclusion. http://www.girlscouts.org/who_we_are/leadership/the_architecture_of_inclusion.pdf, accessed Oct. 2009.Google Scholar
Girl Scouts of the USA. 2007b. Annual Report. New York: Girl Scouts of the USA.Google ScholarPubMed
Gitlin, Todd. 1996. The Twilight of Common Dreams: Why America is Wracked by Culture Wars. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Hinds, Michael deCourcy. 1991. “In Tests of Who Can Join, Scouts Confront Identity.” New York Times June 23: A12.Google Scholar
Hofman, John. 1972. Readiness for Social Relations between Arabs and Jews in Israel Journal of Conflict Resolution 16(2): 241–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hunter, James Davison. 2000. The Death of Character. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 2004. Who Are We: The Challenges to America's National Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kastor, Elisabeth. 1984. “Breaking the Cookie Mold.” The Washington Post, March 16: B5.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 2005. When Affirmative Action was White: An Untold Story of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Keane, J. Carey. 1991. “Internal Memorandum of the Boy Scouts of America, June 24, 1991 to Regional Directors, Area Directors, Scout Executives and Division Directors from J. Carey Keane, National Director of Relationships/Marketing.” http://www.bsa-discrimination.org/html/bsa_gay_policy.html#1991.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsitz, Joan 1977. Growing Up Forgotten: A Review of Research and Programs Concerning Early Adolescence. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Lopez, Kathryn Jean. 2000. The Cookie Crumbles: The Girl Scouts Go PC. National Review 52 (20): 30.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Heather. 2000. Why the Boy Scouts Work. City Journal 10 (1): 1427.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Robert. 1993. Sons of the Empire: The Frontier and the Boy Scout Movement 1890–1918. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarquhar, Neil. 2007. “To Muslim Girls, Scouts offer a Chance to Fit In.” New York Times, November 28: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/28/us/28girlscout.html.Google Scholar
Macleod, David. 1983. Building Character in the American Boy: The Boy Scouts, YMCA and Their Forerunners, 1870–1920. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2002. The Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, Daniel. 2002. The Supreme Court's Latest Resolution of the Conflict between Freedom of Association and Public Accommodations Laws: Boy Scouts of America v Dale and it Implications In and Out of the Courtroom. Villanova Law Review 47 (2): 387421.Google Scholar
Mechling, Jay. 2001. On My Honor: Boy Scouts and the Making of American Youth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 1998. Dividing Citizens: Gender and Federalism in New Deal Public Policy. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2005. “National Briefing: South: Alabama: Inquiry Into Scouts' Rolls.” January 26.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2006. “Scouting Group Inflated Roster, Inquiry Shows.” June 4.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Joyce. 2001. “Gay Critics Continue to Pursue Boy Scouts.” Washington Times, June 28: A1.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Touchstone Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhea, Joseph. 2001. Race Pride and the American Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1998. Achieving Our Country. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Michael. 1986. The Character Factory: Baden Powell and the Origins of the Scout Movement, London: Collins Springhall.Google Scholar
Sandler, Martin, and Hudson, Deborah. 1998. Beyond the Bottom Line: How to do More with Less in Nonprofit and Public Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2004. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Stephen, Andrew. 2001. “Boy Scouts Fail the Tolerance Test.” New Statesman, August 6: 16.Google Scholar
Taylor, Catharine. 2002. Girl Scouts Extend Multicultural Reach. Advertising Age 73 (3): 1820.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1992. Multiculturalism and “The Politics of Recognition”: An Essay by Charles Taylor. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Mark. n/d. “How to Turn On Your Organization in Tough Times.” Interview with Frances Hesselbein, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ePEErvhlQ8.Google Scholar
Tyre, Peg. 2001. “Where the Girls Are.” Newsweek. 138 (6): 51–2.Google Scholar
Weisinger, Judith, and Salipante, Paul. 2005. A Grounded Theory for Building Ethnically Bridging Social Capital in Voluntary Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 34 (1): 2955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, David. 1974. “Boy Scouts Reveal Program to Stop Cheating on Quotas.” Chicago Tribune, June 11: C10.Google Scholar
Zeiger, Hans. 2005. Get Off My Honor. Nashville, TN: Broadman and Holman Publishers.Google Scholar
Zernike, Kate. 2000. “Scouts' Successful Ban on Gays is Followed by Loss in Support.” New York Times, August 29: A1.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Arneil supplementary material

Explanatory file

Download Arneil supplementary material(File)
File 25 KB
Supplementary material: File

Arneil supplementary material

Girl Scout data

Download Arneil supplementary material(File)
File 72 KB
7
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Gender, Diversity, and Organizational Change: The Boy Scouts vs. Girl Scouts of America
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Gender, Diversity, and Organizational Change: The Boy Scouts vs. Girl Scouts of America
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Gender, Diversity, and Organizational Change: The Boy Scouts vs. Girl Scouts of America
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *