Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-vbn2q Total loading time: 0.21 Render date: 2021-07-26T15:34:06.788Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

The Geography of Citizenship Practice: How the Poor Engage the State in Rural and Urban India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2020


When and why do poor citizens expect the state to respond to their claims, and how do those expectations shape citizenship practice? Drawing on survey and qualitative research in northern India, our study reveals an expectations gap that complicates widely held views of the urban core versus the rural periphery. The urban poor residing in slums are dramatically less likely to believe that they will get a direct response from an official compared to similarly poor rural residents. Slum residents are also significantly more likely than villagers to report the presence of political brokers, who create mediated channels for claim-making. Reflecting on these patterns, we develop a place-based theory to explain sub-national variation in citizen-state engagement. We focus in the northern Indian context on three interrelated factors that shape the local terrain for citizenship practice: the greater visibility of social welfare provision in villages compared to slums; the greater depth of rural decentralization; and the greater strength of urban party organizations. Extending beyond northern India, we propose an analytical framework for the study of citizenship that examines how citizens’ local experiences of state institutions influence sub-national patterns of participation.

© American Political Science Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


A list of permanent links to Supplemental Materials provided by the authors precedes the References section.


Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at:

They are listed alphabetically. For their valuable comments on this article, they thank Jennifer Bussell, Alice Evans, Erum Haider, Devesh Kapur, Suchi Pande, Sandip Sukhtankar, Pavithra Suryanarayan, Emmanuel Teitelbaum, Tariq Thachil, Priyamvada Trivedi, Milan Vaishnav, Matthew Winters, Adam Ziegfeld, four anonymous reviewers, and seminar participants at the Washington, DC India Politics Workshop; the Center for the Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania; the Ashoka University/University of California–Berkeley Workshop on Political Representation; and the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting.


Appadurai, Arjun. 2004. “The Capacity to Aspire.” In Culture and Public Action , ed. Rao, Vijayendra and Walton, Michael. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Adam Michael. 2016. “Clients and Communities: The Political Economy of Party Network Organization and Development in India’s Urban Slums.” World Politics 68(1): 111–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Adam Michael. 2017. “Neighborhood Associations and the Urban Poor: India’s Slum Development Committees.” World Development 46: 119–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Adam Michael. 2020. Demanding Development: The Politics of Public Goods Provision in India’s Urban Slums. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Adam Michael and Thachil, Tariq. 2018. “How Clients Select Brokers: Competition and Choice in India’s Slums” American Political Science Review 112(4): 775–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auyero, Javier. 2000. Poor People’s Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banda, S., Bhaik, V., Jha, B., Mandelkern, B. and Sheikh, S.. 2014. “Negotiating Citizenship in F Block.” Cities of Delhi Project Report. New Delhi: Centre for Policy Research. ( Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Baviskar, Amita. 2003. “Between Violence and Desire: Space, Power, and Identity in the Making of Metropolitan Delhi.” International Social Science Journal 55(175): 8998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behl, Natasha. 2019. Gendered Citizenship: Understanding Gendered Violence in Democratic India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenschot, Ward. 2010. “Everyday Mediation: The Politics of Public Service Delivery in Gujarat, India.” Development and Change 41(5): 883905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenschot, Ward. 2018. “The Political Economy of Clientelism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Patronage Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 51(12): 1563–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertorelli, Ebony, Heller, Patrick, Swaminathan, Siddharth and Varshney, Ashutosh. 2014. Citizenship in Urban India. The Janaagraha-Brown Citizenship Index Study. ( Scholar
Bhan, Gautam, Goswami, Amlanjyoti and Revi, Aromar. 2014. “The Intent to Reside.” State of the Urban Poor Report. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bohlken, Anjali Thomas. 2016. Democratization from Above: The Logic of Local Democracy in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkerhoff, Derick, Wetterberg, Anna and Wibbels, Erik. 2018. “Distance, Services, and Citizen Perceptions of the State in Rural Africa.” Governance 31: 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussell, Jennifer. 2019. Clients and Constituents: Political Responsiveness in Patronage Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea. 2003. How Policies make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 2004. The Politics of the Governed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chauchard, Simon. 2017. Why Representation Matters: The Meaning of Ethnic Quotas in Rural India. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbridge, Stuart, Williams, Glyn, Srivastava, Manoj and Véron, René. 2005. Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Alice. 2018. “Politicising Inequality.” World Development 110: 360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob and Pierson, Paul. 2019. “Policy Feedback in an Age of Polarization.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 685(1): 828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardgrave, Robert and Kochanek, Stanley. 2008. India. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Harriss, John. 2005. “Political Participation, Representation, and the Urban Poor.” Economic and Political Weekly 40(11): 1041–54.Google Scholar
Heller, Patrick, Mukhopadhyay, Partho, Banda, Subhadra and Sheikh, Shahana. 2015. “Exclusion, Informality, and Predation in the Cities of Delhi.” Centre for Policy Research. ( Scholar
Holland, Alisha. 2018. “Diminished Expectations: Redistributive Preferences in Truncated Welfare States.” World Politics 70(4): 555–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Rob and Manor, James. 2017. Politics and the Right to Work: India’s National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, Saumitra, Rao, Vijayendra and Woolcock, Michael. 2007. “Governance in the Gullies: Democratic Responsiveness and Leadership in Delhi’s Slums.” World Development 35(2): 230–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapur, Devesh and Mehta, Pratap. 2007. Public Institutions in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 1990. Democracy and Discontent: India’s Growing Crisis of Governability. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krishna, Anirudh. 2002. Active Social Capital: Tracing the Roots of Development and Democracy . New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, Anirudh, ed. 2008. Poverty, Participation, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, Anirudh. 2011. “Gaining Access to Public Services and the Democratic State in India.” Studies in Comparative International Development 46: 98117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, Anirudh and Bajpai, Devendra. 2011. “Lineal Spread and Radial Dissipation: Experiencing Growth in Rural India, 1993–2005.” Economic and Political Weekly 46(38): 4451.Google Scholar
Krishna, Anirudh and Schober, Gregory. 2014. “The Gradient of Governance: Distance and Disengagement in Indian Villages.” Journal of Development Studies 50(6): 820–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruks-Wisner, Gabrielle. 2018a. Claiming the State: Active Citizenship and Social Welfare in Rural India. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruks-Wisner, Gabrielle. 2018b. “The Pursuit of Social Welfare: Citizen Claim-Making in Rural India.” World Politics 70(1): 122–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Daniel. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 53(1): 69105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, Richard and Thelen, Kathleen. 1995. “Apples and Oranges Revisited: Contextualized Comparisons and the Study of Comparative Labor Politics.” Politics & Society 23: 337–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLean, Lauren. 2011. “State retrenchment and the exercise of citizenship in Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 44(9): 12381266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manor, James. 2000. “Small-Time Fixers in India’s States.” Asian Survey 40(5): 816–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manor, James. 2010. “What Do They Know of India Who Only India Know?Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 48(4): 505–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1852. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: Die Revolution.Google Scholar
Mathew, George. 1994. Status of Panchayati Raj in the States of India. Delhi: Concept.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne and Soss, Joe. 2004. “The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship.” Perspectives on Politics 2(1): 5573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, Arun Kumar and Dasgupta, Shubhagato. 2014. “Evolution of National Policies for Basic Services, Affordable Housing, and Livelihoods for the Urban Poor.” Inclusive Urban Planning. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1996. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Beacon.Google Scholar
Nathan, Noah. 2019. Electoral Politics and Africa’s Urban Transition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayar, B. R. 2009. The Myth of the Shrinking State. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2002. “Women’s Power at the Ballot Box.” In Voter Turnout Since 1945. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy & Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
National Sample Survey Office. 2014. “Urban Slums in India, 2012.” Report 561. New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.Google Scholar
Post, Alison, Bronsoler, Vivian and Salman, Lana. 2017. “Hybrid Regimes for Local Public Goods Provision.” Perspectives on Politics 15(4): 952–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, Shirin and Lievesley, Geraldine, eds. 2013. Women and the State: International Perspectives. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramanathan, Ramesh. 2007. “Federalism, Urban Decentralization, and Citizen Participation.” Economic and Political Weekly 42(8): 674–81.Google Scholar
Singer, Wendy. 2007. A Constituency Suitable for Ladies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan, Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo and Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukhtankar, Sandip. 2016. “India’s National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme: What Do We Really Know about the World’s Largest Workfare Program?India Policy Forum 13. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Tewari, V. 2002. “An Assessment of SJSRY in Rajasthan.” Delhi: NIUA Report.Google Scholar
Thachil, Tariq. 2018. “Improving Surveys through Ethnography: Insights from India’s Urban Periphery.” Studies in Comparative International Development 53(3): 281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Lily. 2010. “Quantitative Research and Issues of Political Sensitivity in Rural China.” In Contemporary Chinese Politics , ed. Carlson, Allen, Gallagher, Mary, Lieberthal, Keith and Manion, Melanie, 246–65. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2011. Inequality Adjusted Human Development Index for India’s States. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Vaishnav, Milan. 2015. Understanding the Indian Voter. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 1998. Democracy, Development, and the Countryside. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Auerbach and Kruks-Wisner Dataset

Supplementary material: PDF

Auerbach and Kruks-Wisner supplementary material

Auerbach and Kruks-Wisner supplementary material

Download Auerbach and Kruks-Wisner supplementary material(PDF)

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Geography of Citizenship Practice: How the Poor Engage the State in Rural and Urban India
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Geography of Citizenship Practice: How the Poor Engage the State in Rural and Urban India
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Geography of Citizenship Practice: How the Poor Engage the State in Rural and Urban India
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *