Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-qdp55 Total loading time: 0.401 Render date: 2021-12-05T17:41:56.616Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Legitimacy in Autocracies: Oxymoron or Essential Feature?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2018

Abstract

Legitimacy is a key concept in political science. It has deep normative roots in democratic theory and refers usually to righteous, just, fair, and therefore acceptable rule. However, non-democracies also try to create a following among their citizens. They also engage in justifying their rule through politicization, be it of religion, ethnicity, or ideologies ranging from left-wing communism to right-wing nationalism. Against this backdrop, I pose the question: does it make sense to use the concept of legitimacy for both types of regimes, democracies and autocracies alike? Or, do we overstretch the concept when transplanting it to the non-democratic realm? And, empirically, how can we assess to what degree a non-democracy is viewed as legitimate by its citizens? I aim therefore at defining what legitimacy and legitimation is in autocratic settings; drawing a semantic map of rival concepts like support, trust, and loyalty; and tackling concrete challenges in measuring this elusive concept.

Type
Special Section: The Persistence of Authoritarianism
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arriola, Leonardo R. 2009. “Patronage and Political Stability in Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 42(10): 1339–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Rodney. 2001. Legitimating Identities: The Self-Presentations of Rulers and Subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetham, David. 1991. The Legitimation of Power. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark, Jamal, Amaney, and Mazur, Kevin. 2015. “Explaining Divergent Revolutionary Coalitions: Regime Strategies and the Structuring of Participation in the Tunisian and Egyptian Revolution.” Comparative Politics 48(1): 124.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Michael. 1993. The Origins of Democratization in Poland: Workers, Intellectuals, and Oppositional Politics, 1976–1980. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jidong, Pan, Jennifer, and Xu, Yiqing. 2016. “Sources of Authoritarian Responsiveness: A Field Experiment in China.” American Journal of Political Science 60(2): 383400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 1986. Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2007. “State Repression and Political Order.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrov, Martin K. 2014. “What the Party Wanted to Know: Citizen Complaints as a ‘Barometer of Public Opinion’ in Communist Bulgaria.” East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 28(2): 271–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinas, Elias and Northmore-Ball, Ksenia. 2017. “The Ideological Shadow of Authoritarianism.” Presented at the New Politics of Authoritarianism conference, Oxford, March 15, 2017.Google Scholar
Dukalskis, Alexander. 2017. Authoritarian Public Sphere: Legitimation and Autocratic Power in North Korea, Burma, and China. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dukalskis, Alexander and Gerschewski, Johannes. 2017. “What Autocracies Say (and What Citizens Hear): Proposing Four Mechanisms of Autocratic Legitimation.” Contemporary Politics 23(3): 251–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James S., He, Baogang, Luskin, Robert C., and Siu, Alice. 2010. “Deliberative Democracy in an Unlikely Place: Deliberative Polling in China.” British Journal of Political Science 40(2): 435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 1994.”Political Concepts and Ideological Morphology,” Journal of Political Philosophy 2(2): 140–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 2009. “Languages of Political Support: Engaging with the Public Realm.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12(2): 183202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Carl Joachim. 1957. Totalitäre Diktatur. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Dieter and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 2009. “David Easton: The Theory of the Political System.” In Masters of Political Science, ed. Campus, Donatella and Pasquino, Gianfranco. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer and Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2009. “Elections under Authoritarianism.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer and Przeworski, Adam. 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies 40(11): 1279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara and Zaller, John. 1989. “Sources of Popular Support for Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 33(2): 319–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. 1999. “What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences.” Polity 31(3): 357–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerschewski, Johannes. 2013. “The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Co-optation in Autocratic Regimes.” Democratization 20(1): 1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 2013. “Loyalty and Morality.” In Loyalty. Ed. Levinson, S., Parker, J., and Woodruff, P.. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Graeme. 2015. Building an Authoritarian Polity: Russia in Post-Soviet Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilley, Bruce. 2009. The Right to Rule: How States Win and Lose Legitimacy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2009. “Point of Departure: Intension and Extension.” In Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. ed. Collier, D. and Gerring, J.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grauvogel, Julia and Soest, Christian von. 2014. “Claims to Legitimacy Matter: Why Sanctions Fail to Instigate Democratisation in Authoritarian Regimes.” European Journal of Political Research 53(3): 635–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Rongbin. 2015. “Defending the Authoritarian Regime Online: China’s ‘Voluntary Fifty-Cent Army.’” China Quarterly (224): 1006–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1999. “Do We Want Trust in Government.” In Democracy and Trust, ed. Warren, Mark E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Noland, Marcus. 2011. Witness to Transformation. Refugee Insights into North Korea. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Haldenwang, Christian von. 2017. “The Relevance of Legitimation: A New Framework for Analysis.” Contemporary Politics 23(3): 269–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Baogang and Warren, Mark E.. 2011. “Authoritarian Deliberation. The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development.” Perspectives on Politics 9(2): 269–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Declines in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1993. “Exit, Voice, and the Fate of the German Democratic Republic: An Essay in Conceptual History.” World Politics 45(3): 173202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbig, Heike. 2013. “Ideology after the End of Ideology: China and the Quest for Autocratic Legitimation.” Democratization 20(1): 6181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbig, Heike and Gilley, Bruce. 2010. “Reclaiming Legitimacy in China.” Politics & Policy 38(3): 395422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaase, Max. 1999. “Interpersonal Trust, Political Trust and non-Institutionalised Political Participation in Western Europe.” West European Politics 22(3): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kailitz, Steffen and Stockemer, Daniel. 2015. “Regime Legitimation, Elite Cohesion and the Durability of Autocratic Regime Types.” International Political Science Review 38(3): 332–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, Holger L. and Hainmueller, Jens. 2009. “Opium for the Masses: How Foreign Media Can Stabilize Authoritarian Regimes.” Political Analysis 17(4): 377–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter and Fuchs, Dieter, eds. 1995. Citizen and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.” World Politics 44(1): 748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur(1997) Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret and Stoker, Laura. 2000. “Political Trust and Trustworthiness.” Annual Review of Political Science 3(1): 475507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret, Sacks, Audrey, and Tyler, Tom. 2009. “Conceptualizing Legitimacy. Measuring Legitimacy Beliefs.” American Behavioral Scientist 53(3): 354–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2008. “Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies 41(4/5): 715–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesky, Edmund and Schuler, Paul. 2010. “Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegates Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament.” American Political Science Review 104(3): 482502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquez, Xavier. 2015. “The Irrelevance of Legitimacy.” Political Studies 64(1): 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, ed. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Kane, Rosemary H. T. 1993. “Against Legitimacy.” Political Studies 41(3): 471–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakulski, Jan. 1986. “Legitimacy and Mass Compliance: Reflections on Max Weber and Soviet-Type Societies.” British Journal of Political Science 16(1): 3556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas. 2014. “The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism.” British Journal of Political Science 44(3): 631–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigby, Thomas Henry and Fehér, Ferenc. 1982. Political Legitimation in Communist States. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64(4): 1033–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G. 1984. Social Science Concepts. A Systematic Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, ed. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Conmpetition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas 2011. “Concept Formation.” In International Encyclopedia of Political Science, ed. Badie, Bertrand, Berg-Schlosser, Dirk, and Morlino, Leonardo. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas 2013. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1993. “Obligation, Loyalty, Exile.” Political Theory 21(2):,181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Benjamin. 2005. “Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party Rule.” World Politics 57(3): 421–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2009. “Power Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 53(2): 477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan W(2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stromseth, Jonathan, Malesky, Edmund M., and Gueorguiev, Dimitar. 2017. China’s Governance Puzzle: Enabling Transparency and Participation in a Single-Party State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thyen, Kressen and Gerschewski, Johannes. 2017. “Legitimacy and Protest under Authoritarianism: Explaining Student Mobilization in Egypt and Morocco during the Arab Uprising.” Democratization. Online First. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2017.1314462.Google Scholar
Truex, Rory. 2017. “Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits.” Comparative Political Studies 50(3): 329–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1992. “Measuring Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 86(1): 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978 [1922]. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2005 [1922]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Die Wirtschaft und die gesellschaftlichen Ordnungen und Mächte. Nachlass, ed. Hanke, Editha. Vol. 22–4 Max Weber Gesamtausgabe. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 1999. Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weßels, Bernhard. 2016. “Democratic Legitimacy. Concepts, Measures, Outcome.”In How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy, ed. Ferrín, Monica and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Würtenberger, Thomas. 1982. “Legitimität, Legalität.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, ed. Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart. Vol. 3. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
29
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Legitimacy in Autocracies: Oxymoron or Essential Feature?
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Legitimacy in Autocracies: Oxymoron or Essential Feature?
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Legitimacy in Autocracies: Oxymoron or Essential Feature?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *