Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-j5sqr Total loading time: 0.275 Render date: 2022-10-01T21:09:30.139Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Populism’s Challenge and the Uncertain Future of Liberal Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2020

Kyong-Min Son*
Affiliation:
University of Delaware

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review Essay
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brenner, Robert. 2002. The Boom and the Bubble: The U.S. in the World Economy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Desilver, Drew. 2018. “For Most U.S. Workers, Real Wages Have Barely Budged in Decades.” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/08/07/for-most-us-workers-real-wages-have-barely-budged-for-decades/.Google Scholar
Ercan, Selen A., and Gagnon, Jean-Paul. 2014. “The Crisis of Democracy: Which Crisis? Which Democracy?Democratic Theory 1(2): 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 2018. “Real Median Household Income in the United States.” https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and Shin, Taekjin. 2004. “The Shareholder Value Society: A Review in Changes in Working Conditions in the U.S., 1976–2000.” In Social Inequality, ed. Neckerman, Kathryn M., 401–32. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Foa, Roberto Stefan, and Mounk, Yascha. 2017. “The Signs of Deconsolidation.” Journal of Democracy 28(1): 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2010. “Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States.” Politics & Society 38(2): 152204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J. 2011. “National Debates, Local Responses: The Origins of Local Concern about Immigration in Britain and the United States.” British Journal of Political Science 41(3): 499524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, Arne L. 2001. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kazin, Michal. 1995. The Populist Persuasion: An American History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Annalyn, Yellin, Tal, and Houp, Will. 2019. “The US Minimum Wage through the Years.” CNN Business. April 9. https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2019/business/us-minimum-wage-by-year/index.html.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. “Populism: What’s in a Name?” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, ed. Panizza, F., 3249. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Lynda. 2013. “Who’s Minding the Kids? Child Care Arrangements: Spring 2011.” U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/p70-135.pdf.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511659935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39(4): 542–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. 2012. “Populism: Corrective and Threat to Democracy.” In Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? ed. Mudde, Cas and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, 205–22. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Benjamin, Merolla, Jennifer L., Shah, Sono, Lemi, Danielle Casarez, Collingwood, Loren, and Ramakrishnan, S. Karthick. 2020. “The Trump Effect: An Experimental Investigation of the Emboldening Effect of Racially Inflammatory Elite Communication.” British Journal of Political Science. First View: 122. doi:10.1017/S0007123419000590.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. Jr., Zelikow, Philip D., and King, David C., eds. 1997. Why People Don’t Trust the Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. 2003. The Vanishing Voter: Public Involvement in an Age of Uncertainty. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Pharr, Susan J., and Putnam, Robert D., eds. 2000. Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691186849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2001. “Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998.” NBER Working Paper no. 8467. https://www.nber.org/papers/w8467.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” In Democracy's Value, ed. Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, Casiano, 2355. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances McCall, and Shapiro, Ian. 2018. Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy for Itself. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.2307/j.ctv6hp3bfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674726383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2019. “Union Membership Rate 10.5 Percent in 2018, down from 20.1 Percent in 1983.” https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2019/union-membership-rate-10-point-5-percent-in-2018-down-from-20-point-1-percent-in-1983.htm?view_full.Google Scholar
Women’s Bureau. 2019. “Facts over Time—Women in the Labor Force.” Department of Labor. https://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/NEWSTATS/facts/women-lf-text.htm.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Populism’s Challenge and the Uncertain Future of Liberal Democracy
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Populism’s Challenge and the Uncertain Future of Liberal Democracy
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Populism’s Challenge and the Uncertain Future of Liberal Democracy
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *