Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-zmlw7 Total loading time: 0.247 Render date: 2021-06-14T07:05:49.301Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Trump-ing Foreign Affairs: Status Threat and Foreign Policy Preferences on the Right

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2019

Abstract

President Trump is often at odds with the conservative establishment over a range of issues, not least of which is foreign policy. Yet it remains unclear whether supporting “Trumpism” is commensurate with coherent foreign policy views that are distinct from conventionally conservative positions. We evaluate whether the foreign policy views of Trump’s supporters, both in the voting public and among activists, differ from those of other Republicans. We use the 2016 ANES to examine Republican primary voters and the new 2016 State Convention Delegate Study to assess Republican activists. In doing so, we reveal systematic differences in foreign policy preferences between Trump supporters and more establishment conservatives. We demonstrate that the status-threat model need not be confined to domestic politics. Indeed, it may be extended to explain foreign policy preferences on the political right, that of Trump’s supporters in the present case. In doing so, we also find evidence that status threat may well be the source of fracture in the Republican Party.

Type
Special Section: Consequences
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

A list of permanent links to Supplemental Materials provided by the authors precedes the References section.

*

Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GNCDZR

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L.. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60(3): 634–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?Journal of Politics 70(2): 542–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., Rickershauser, Jill, and Rohde, David W.. 2007. “Fear in the Voting Booth: The 2004 Presidential Election.” Political Behavior 29(2): 197220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 718–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. and Rohde, David W.. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection. In Congress Reconsidered. 7th ed., eds. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 269–92.Google Scholar
Allitt, Patrick. 2009. The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities throughout American History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
American National Election Studies, University of Michigan, and Stanford University. “ANES 2016 Time Series Study.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2017-09-19. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36824.v2Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2018. “Partisanship in the Trump Era.” Journal of Politics 80(4): 1483–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, Michael C. 2018. “Donald Trump’s Approval Rating Inches Higher, Buoyed by Republican Support.” Wall Street Journal, July 22. https://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trumps-approval-rating-inches-higher-buoyed-by-republican-support-1532293201.Google Scholar
Blair Center. 2015. “Tea Party Distinguished by Racial Views and Fear of the Future: Findings from the Blair-Rockefeller poll.” Diane D. Blair Center of Southern Politics and Society. https://blaircenter.uark.edu/polling-data-reports/2010-poll/tea-party/Google Scholar
Blum, Rachel. 2018. “Anti-Elitism or Economics? The Tea Party and Shifting Fault Lines in the GOP.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, 31 August .Google Scholar
Blum, Rachel. Forthcoming. Party Takeover: The Tea Party and Party Factions in the U.S. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence and Hutchings, Vincent L.. 1996. “Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer’s Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context.” American Sociological Review 61(6): 951–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cherlin, Andrew. 2016. “The Downwardly Mobile for Trump.” New York Times , August 25. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/25/opinion/campaign-stops/the-downwardly-mobile-for-trump.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Conway, M. Margaret and Feigert, Frank B.. 1968. “Motivations, Incentive Systems, and the Political Party Organization.” American Political Science Review 62(4): 1159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, Dale. 1996. “Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations.’’ International Security 20(4): 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Maureen A. and Richeson., Jennifer 2014. “On the Precipice of a ‘Majority–Minority’ America: Perceived Status Threat from the Racial Demographic Shift Affects White Americans’ Political Ideology. Psychological Science 25(6): 1189–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dueck, Colin. 2006. Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Devos, Thierry and Banaji, Mahzarin R.. 2005. “American = White?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88(3): 447466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Economist. 2016. “What Donald Trump Thinks about Trade.’’ November 9. https://www.economist.com/united-states/2016/11/09/how-donald-trump-thinks-about-trade.Google Scholar
Federico, Christopher M. and Golec de Zavala, Agnieszka. 2018. “Collective Narcissism and the 2016 US Presidential Vote.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82(1): 110–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley and Karen Stenner, . 1997. “Perceived threat and authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 18(4): 741–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
FiveThirtyEight. 2019. “Tracking Congress in the Age of Trump.” Retrieved January 19, 2019. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-trump-score/.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jo. 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101(3): 327–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frum, David. 2017. “Conservatism Can’t Survive Donald Trump Intact.” The Atlantic, December 19. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/12/conservatism-is-what-conservatives-think-say-and-do/548738/.Google Scholar
Gadarian, Shana Kushner. 2010. “Foreign Policy at the Ballot Box: How Citizens Use Foreign Policy to Judge and Choose Candidates.” Journal of Politics 72(4): 1046–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, Bryan and Morris, Irwin. 2018. Reactionary Republicans: How the Tea Party in the House Paved the Way for Trump’s Victory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, Matt and Hopkins, David A.. 2015. “Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats: The Asymmetry of American Party Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 13(1): 119–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Matt and Hopkins, David A.. 2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. 1963. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Herrera, Richard. 1992. “The Understanding of Ideological Labels by Political Elites: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 45(4): 1021–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1965. The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Colin, López-Rodríguez, Lucía Fessler, Daniel M. T., Vázquez, Alexandra, and Gómez, Ángel. 2017. “Gulliver’s Politics: Conservatives Envision Potential Enemies as Readily Vanquished and Physically Small.” Political Psychology 8(6): 670–78.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. and Rosenau, James N.. 1996. “Liberals, Populists, Libertarians, and Conservatives: The Link between Domestic and International Affairs.” International Political Science Review 17(1): 2954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2000. “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection.” In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, eds. Bond, Jon R. and Fleisher, Richard 9–30. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 339–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabaservice, Geoffrey. 2012. Rule and Ruin: The Downfall of Moderation and the Destruction of the Republican Party, from Eisenhower to the Tea Party. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karol, David and Miguel, Edward. 2007. “The Electoral Cost of War: Iraq Casualties and the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics 69(3): 633–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Katy. 2017. “Why Trump’s Supporters Will Never Abandon HimBBC News, August 23. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41028733.Google Scholar
Keele, Luke. 2005. “The Authorities Really Do Matter: Party Control and Trust in Government.” Journal of Politics 67(3): 873–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, Russell. 1953: The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot . Washington, DC: Regnery Press.Google Scholar
La Raja, Raymond J., and Shaffner, Brian F.. 2015. Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C. and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 786802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., Green, John C., Herrera, Richard, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review 104(2): 324–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, Gabriel. 2012. Follow the Leader: How Voters Respond to Politicians Policies and Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Robert and Campbell, Donald. 1972. Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes, and Group Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Raab, Earl. 1978. The Politics of Unreason: Right-Wing Extremism in America, 1790–1970. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
MacLean, Nancy. 1994. Behind the Mask of Chivalry: The Making of the Second Ku Klux Klan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacWilliams, Matthew C. 2016. “Who Decides When the Party Doesn’t: Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Trump.” PS: Political Science and Politics 49(4): 716–21.Google Scholar
Major, Brenda, Blodorn, Alison, and Major Blascovich, Gregory. 2016. “The Threat of Increasing Diversity: Why Many White Americans Support Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 21(6): 931–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manza, Jeff and Crowley, Ned. 2017. “Working Class Hero? Interrogating the Social Bases of the Rise of Donald Trump.” The Forum, May 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “`I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 128–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, James A. 1995. “Nomination Politics and Ideological Polarization: Assessing the Attitudinal Effects of Campaign Involvement.” Journal of Politics 57(1): 101–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. The Realignment of National Politics and Income Distribution. Washington, DC: AEI PressGoogle Scholar
McClosky, Herbert, Hoffman, Paul, and O’Hara, Rosemary 1960. “Issue Conflict and Consensus among Party Leaders and Followers.” American Political Science Review 54(2): 406–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGirr, Lisa. 2001. Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New Right . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McVeigh, Rory. 2009. The Rise of the Ku Klux Klan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Gary and Schofield, Norman. 2003. “Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 97(2): 245–60.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. and Kent Jennings, M.. 1986. Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana. 2018. “Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 15(19): E4330E4339.Google Scholar
Nincic, Miroslav and Hinckley, Barbara. 1991. “Foreign Policy and the Evaluation of Presidential Candidates.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35(2): 333–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noel, Hans. 2013. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut and Sidman, Andrew H.. 2007. “Mission Accomplished: The Wartime Election of 2004.” Political Behavior 29(2): 175–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1962. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Parker, Christopher S. and Barreto, Matt A.. 2014. Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40(3): 825–50.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F. 2017. “Social Psychological Perspectives on Trump Supporters.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology 5(1): 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Philip H., Lilie, Stuart A., and Elliot Vittes, M.. 1993. “Hard Issues, Core Values and Vertical Constraint: The Case of Nuclear Power.” British Journal of Political Science 23(1): 2950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratto, Felicia, Jim Sidanius, Stallworth, Lisa M. and Malle, Benjamin F.. 1994. “Social Dominance Orientation: A Personality Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes.’’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67(4): 741763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbun, Brian. 2007. “Uncertain about Uncertainty: Understanding the Multiple Meanings of a Crucial Concept in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 51(3): 533–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbun, Brian. 2008. “Does One Right Make a Realist? Conservatism, Neoconservatism, and Isolationism in the Foreign Policy Ideology of American Elites.” Political Science Quarterly 123(2): 271–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbun, Brian. 2013. “Steeped in International Affairs? The Foreign Policy Views of the Tea Party.” Foreign Policy Analysis 9(1): 2137.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian, Kertzer, Joshua D. Reifler, Jason Goren, Paul and Scotto, Thomas J.. 2016. “Taking Foreign Policy Personally: Personal Values and Foreign Policy Attitudes.” International Studies Quarterly 60(1): 124–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Katie. 2018. “John McCain Calls Trump’s Press Conference with Putin ‘One of the Most Disgraceful Performances by an American President’.” CNN, July 16. http://time.com/5339932/john-mccain-statement-trump-putin-meeting/.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven and Hansen, John. 1993. “Mobilization, Participation, and American Democracy.” New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton. 1982. Conservatism in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, Kyle L. and Abramowitz, Alan I.. 2004. “Ideological Realignment and Active Partisans in the American Electorate.” American Politics Research 32(3): 285309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, John, Tesler, Michael and Vavrek, Lynn. 2018. Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1991. National Identity. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, Bret. 2017. “Trump’s Foreign Policy: The Conservatives’ Report Card.” New York Times, July 21. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/21/opinion/trumps-foreign-policy-the-conservatives-report-card.html.Google Scholar
Stone, Walter J. and Abramowitz, Alan I.. 1983. “Winning May Not Be Everything, But It’s More Than We Thought.” American Political Science Review 77(4): 945–56.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Lehman Schlozman, Kay and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Blum and Parker Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: File

Blum and Parker supplementary material

Blum and Parker supplementary material 1

Download Blum and Parker supplementary material(File)
File 2 MB
3
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Trump-ing Foreign Affairs: Status Threat and Foreign Policy Preferences on the Right
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Trump-ing Foreign Affairs: Status Threat and Foreign Policy Preferences on the Right
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Trump-ing Foreign Affairs: Status Threat and Foreign Policy Preferences on the Right
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *