Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-xbgml Total loading time: 0.27 Render date: 2022-08-11T00:46:23.819Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2010

Kay Lehman Schlozman
Affiliation:
Boston College
Sidney Verba
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Henry E. Brady
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

What is the impact of the possibility of political participation on the Internet on long-standing patterns of participatory inequality in American politics? An August 2008 representative survey of Americans conducted by the Pew Internet and American Life Project provides little evidence that there has been any change in the extent to which political participation is stratified by socio-economic status, but it suggests that the web has ameliorated the well-known participatory deficit among those who have just joined the electorate. Even when only that subset of the population with Internet access is considered, participatory acts such as contributing to candidates, contacting officials, signing a political petition, or communicating with political groups are as stratified socio-economically when done on the web as when done offline. The story is different for stratification by age where historically younger people have been less engaged than older people in most forms of political participation. Young adults are much more likely than their elders to be comfortable with electronic technologies and to use the Internet, but among Internet users, the young are not especially politically active. How these trends play out in the future depends on what happens to the current Web-savvy younger generation and the cohorts that follow and on the rapidly developing political capacities of the Web. Stay logged on …

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, Michael, and Hall, Thad E.. 2004. Point, Click, and Vote. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 2001. “The Likely Consequences of Internet Voting for Political Representation.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 34(3): 11151153.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Stuart Minor. 2006. “Evaluating E-Rulemaking: Public Participation and Political Institutions.” Duke Law Journal 55: 934–35.Google Scholar
Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Benner, Jeffrey. 2002. “Bush Plan ‘Digital Distortion.’Wired. (http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2002/02/50279) (accessed February 16, 2008).Google Scholar
Bennett, Linda, and Bennett, Stephen Earl. 1986. “Political Participation: Meaning and Measurement.” In Annual Review of Political Science, ed. Long, Samuel. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J. 2005. “The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States.” American Politics Research 33(4): 471–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, Samuel, and Krueger, Brian. 2005. “Analyzing the Representativeness of Internet Political Participation.” Political Behavior 27(2): 183216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. 1998. “The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism.” Polity 31(1): 138–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. 1999. “The Internet and Citizen Communication with Government: Does the Medium Matter?Political Communication 16(4): 409–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. 2001. “Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level.” Political Research Quarterly 54(1): 5367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. 2003. Information and American Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, Bruce, and Davis, Richard. 2003. Campaigning Online. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E. 1999. “Political Participation.” In Measures of Political Attitudes, ed. Robinson, John P., Shaver, Philip R., and Wrightsman, Lawrence. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 1999. “Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists.” American Political Science Review 93(1): 153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Andrew. 2006. Internet Politics: States Citizens and New Communications Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Compaine, Benjamin M. 2001. “Declare the War Won.” In The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth, ed. Compaine, Benjamin M.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Conway, Margaret M. 2000. Political Participation in the United States. 3d ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 2006. On Political Equality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Richard. 1999. The Web of Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Richard. 2005. Politics Online: Blogs, Chatrooms, and Discussion Groups in American Democracy. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Davis, Richard. 2009. Typing Politics: The Role of Blogs in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Steve, Elin, Larry, and Reeher, Grant. 2002. Click on Democracy: The Internet's Power to Change Political Apathy into Civic Action. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, Hargittai, Eszter, Celeste, Coral, and Shafer, Steven. 2004. “Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use.” In Social Inequality, ed. Neckerman, Kathryn M.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul, Niemi, Richard G., Hanmer, Michael J., Bederson, Benjamin B., Conrad, Frederick C., and Traugott, Michael W.. 2008. Voting Technology. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Hindman, Matthew. 2009. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Horrigan, John B., and Smith, Aaron. 2007. “Home Broadband Adoption 2007.” Pew Internet and Public Life Project. (http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Broadband%202007.pdf), (accessed February 16, 2008).Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Zeitner, Vicki. 2003. “Internet Use and Civic Engagement.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67(3): 311–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Stephen M. 1998. “The Internet Changes Everything: Revolutionizing Public Participation and Access to Government Information through the Internet.” Administrative Law Review 50: 277337.Google Scholar
Kelly, John. 2009. Review of The Myth of Digital Democracy by Matthew Hindman; Digital Citizenship: The Internet Society and Participation by Karen Mossberger, Caroline J. Tolbert, and Ramona S. McNeal; and Networked Publics edited by Kazys Varnelis. Perspectives on Politics 7(4): 941–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E. 1995. “Attitudes, Opportunities and Incentives: A Field Essay on Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly 48(1): 181209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Sin, Gisela. 2003. “Which Public Goods Are Endangered: How Evolving Communication Technologies Affect ‘The Logic of Collective Action.’Public Choice 117(4): 319–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Michael, and Resnick, David. 2000. Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace ‘Revolution.’ Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Milbrath, Lester W., and Goel, M.L.. 1977. Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics? 2d ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Mossberger, Karen, Tolbert, Caroline J., and McNeal, Ramona S.. 2008. Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mossberger, Karen, Tolbert, Caroline J., and Stansbury, Mary. 2003. Virtual Inequality. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
National Telecommunications, and Information Administration. 2004. A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age. (http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/anol/index.html), (accessed February 16, 2008).Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Junn, Jane, and Stehlik-Barry, Kenneth. 1996. Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, Davis, Zavestoski, Stephen, and Schulman, Stuart W.. 2007. “Democracy and E-Rulemaking: Web-Based Technologies, Participation, and the Potential for Deliberation.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 4(1): 3755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 2002. “Citizen Participation in America: What Do We Know? Why Do We Care?” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V.., New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. 1999. “Civic Participation and the Equality Problem.” In Civic Engagement in American Democracy, ed. Skocpol, Theda and Fiorina, Morris P.. Washington: Brookings.Google Scholar
Shah, Dhavan, Kwak, Nojin, and Holbert, R. Lance. 2001. “‘Connecting’ and ‘Disconnecting’ with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital.” Political Communication 18(2): 141–62.Google Scholar
Thomas, Clayton, and Streib, Gregory. 2003. “The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(1): 83102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., and McNeal, Ramona S.. 2003. “Unraveling the Effects on the Internet on Political Participation?Political Research Quarterly 56(2): 175–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman H.. 1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Anthony G. 2000. Democracy in the Digital Age. New York: Routledge Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Anthony G. 2002. “Civic Participation and Technological Inequality: The ‘Killer Application’ Is Education.” In The Civic Web, ed. Anderson, David M. and Cornfield, Michael. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Williams, Andrew Paul, and Tedesco, John, eds. 2006. The Internet Election: Perspectives on the Web in Campaign 2004. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Xenos, Michael, and Moy, Patricia. 2007. “Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement.” Journal of Communications 57(4): 704–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zukin, Cliff, Keeter, Scott, Andolina, Molly, Jenkins, Krista, and Carpini, Michael X. Delli. 2006. A New Engagement?: Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Schlozman et al. supplementary material

Expanatory file

Download Schlozman et al. supplementary material(File)
File 27 KB
Supplementary material: File

Schlozman et al. supplementary material

SPSS Code for all Results

Download Schlozman et al. supplementary material(File)
File 42 KB
Supplementary material: File

Schlozman et al. supplementary material

Statistical Tests of Differences between Offline and Online Participation

Download Schlozman et al. supplementary material(File)
File 51 KB
224
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *