Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Constructing Freedom: Institutional Pathways to Changing the Gender Division of Labor


In recent years, there has been renewed public discussion regarding the relationship between women’s equality and their traditional responsibility for carework. In this essay, we analyze the structures of choice and constraint that continue to produce the gender division of family labor and thus women's unequal participation in the public sphere. We conceptualize this as a problem of democratic freedom, one that requires building institutional pathways to sustain women's participation. Drawing on Nancy Hirschmann's arguments about processes of social construction and their relation to freedom, we argue that gender inequality in the public sphere means that women are unfree, in the sense that they are not participating as peers in the material and discursive processes of social construction that then help to shape their own desires and decisions. We use that framework to analyze the current landscape in which different subgroups of women make decisions about paid labor and care work. Our goal is to bring into view the way the social construction of desire interacts with the material context to underwrite inequality between women and men and across different groups of women. Gender equality and the project of democracy require participatory parity between women and men in the public sphere. We therefore turn in our last section to an effort to imagine how public policies could construct pathways that can help interrupt and undo the gender division of labor, and thus better support democratic freedom.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Linda Barclay . 2013. “Liberal Daddy Quotas: Why Men Should Take Care of the Children, and How Liberals Can Get Them to Do It.” Hypatia 28: 163–78.

Susan Bickford . 1999. “Reconfiguring Pluralism: Identity and Institutions in the Inegalitarian Polity.” American Journal of Political Science 43(1): 86108.

Michael Bittman , Paula England , Liana Sayer , Nancy Folbre , and George Matheson . 2003. “When Does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work.” American Journal of Sociology 109(1): 186214.

Wendy Brown . 1995. States of Injury. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

M.J. Budig , and P. England . 2001. “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood.” American Sociological Review 66(2): 204–25.

Davina Cooper . 2001. “Against the Current: Social Pathways and the Pursuit of Enduring Change.” Feminist Legal Studies 9(2): 119–48.

Davina Cooper . 2004. Challenging Diversity: Rethinking Equality and the Value of Difference. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Shelley J. Correll , Stephen Benard , and In Paik. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?American Journal of Sociology 112(5): 1297–338.

Lyn Craig . 2007. “Is There Really a Second Shift, and If so, Who Does It? A Time Diary Investigation.” Feminist Review 86: 149–70.

Andrea Doucet . 2009. “Dad and Baby in the First Year: Gendered Responsibilities and Embodiment,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 624: 7898.

Maxine Eichner . 2010. The Supportive State: Families, Government, and America’s Political Ideals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nancy Folbre . 1994. Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint. New York: Routledge.

Nancy Fraser . 2001. “Recognition without Ethics?Theory, Culture & Society 18(2-3): 2142.

Makiko Fuwa , and Philip N. Cohen . 2007. “Housework and Social Policy.” Social Science Research 36: 512–30.

Abbie Goldberg , JuliAnna Smith , and Maureen Perry-Jenkins . 2012. “The Division of Labor in Lesbian, Gay, and Heterosexual New Adoptive Parents.” Journal of Marriage and Family 74: 812–28.

Kristin Goss . 2012. The Paradox of Gender Equality: How American Women’s Groups Gained and Lost Their Public Voice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Ange Marie Hancock . 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5(1): 6379.

Clarissa Rile Hayward . 2000. De-Facing Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cressida J Heyes . 2007. Self-Transformations: Foucault, Ethics, and Normalized Bodies. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mary Romero . 1992. Maid in the U.S.A. New York: Routledge.

Ronald Shaiko . 1996. “Female Participation in Public Interest Nonprofit Governance: Yet Another Glass Ceiling?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 25(3): 302–20.

Dara Strolovich . 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Joan C Tronto . 2002. “The ‘Nanny’ Question in Feminism.” Hypatia 17(2): 3451.

Joan C Tronto . 2005. “Care As the Work of Citizens.” In Women and Citizenship, ed. Marilyn Friedman . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maureen R Waller . 2009. “Family Man in the Other America: New Opportunities, Motivations, and Supports for Paternal Caregiving.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 624: 156–76.

Laurel Weldon . 2011. When Protest Makes Policy: How Social Movements Represent Disadvantaged Groups. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 228 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.