Disch, Lisa 2012. Democratic Representation and the Constituency Paradox. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 10, Issue. 03, p. 599.
Viteritti, Joseph P. 2011. Whose Equality? The Discouraging Politics of American Education (and What We Might Do about It). Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 9, Issue. 03, p. 585.
Shapiro, R. Y. 2011. Public Opinion and American Democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 75, Issue. 5, p. 982.
Miles, Matthew R. 2014. Process over outcome: How perceptions of procedural fairness influence conservative support for redistributive taxes. The Social Science Journal, Vol. 51, Issue. 4, p. 615.
Daguerre, Anne 2011. US Social Policy in the 21st Century: The Difficulties of Comprehensive Social Reform. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 45, Issue. 4, p. 389.
Swalwell, Katy 2015. Mind the civic empowerment gap: Economically elite students and critical civic education. Curriculum Inquiry, Vol. 45, Issue. 5, p. 491.
Flavin, Patrick and Franko, William W. 2016. Government's Unequal Attentiveness to Citizens' Political Priorities. Policy Studies Journal,
Grant, John 2014. The End of Critique? Ideology as Replication in Adorno and Jameson. Culture, Theory and Critique, Vol. 55, Issue. 1, p. 1.
Dubrow, Joshua Kjerulf 2015. Political Inequality is International, Interdisciplinary, and Intersectional. Sociology Compass, Vol. 9, Issue. 6, p. 477.
Rigby, Elizabeth and Wright, Gerald C. 2013. Political Parties and Representation of the Poor in the American States. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 57, Issue. 3, p. 552.
Hayes, Thomas J. 2014. Do Citizens Link Attitudes with Preferences? Economic Inequality and Government Spending in the “New Gilded Age”. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 95, Issue. 2, p. 468.
Ellis, Christopher 2013. Social Context and Economic Biases in Representation. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 75, Issue. 3, p. 773.
Erikson, Robert S. 2015. Income Inequality and Policy Responsiveness. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 11.
Lodge, Martin 2013. Crisis, Resources and the State: Executive Politics in the Age of the Depleted State. Political Studies Review, Vol. 11, Issue. 3, p. 378.
Waddell, Brian 2011. Class Politics, American-Style. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 9, Issue. 03, p. 659.
Enns, Peter K. 2015. Relative Policy Support and Coincidental Representation. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 13, Issue. 04, p. 1053.
Abdelal, Rawi 2013. The profits of power: Commerce andrealpolitikin Eurasia. Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 421.
Kulesza, Christopher Witko, Christopher and Waltenburg, Eric 2016. Reform Interrupted? State Innovation, Court Decisions, and the Past and Future of Campaign Finance Reform in the States. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, Vol. 15, Issue. 2, p. 143.
Schlozman, Kay Lehman Jones, Philip Edward You, Hye Young Burch, Traci Verba, Sidney and Brady, Henry E. 2015. Organizations and the Democratic Representation of Interests: What Does It Mean When Those Organizations Have No Members?. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 13, Issue. 04, p. 1017.
Wiist, William H. 2011. Citizens United, Public Health, and Democracy: The Supreme Court Ruling, Its Implications, and Proposed Action. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 101, Issue. 7, p. 1172.
We explore the possibility that the US political system can usefully be characterized as oligarchic. Using a material-based definition drawn from Aristotle, we argue that oligarchy is not inconsistent with democracy; that oligarchs need not occupy formal office or conspire together or even engage extensively in politics in order to prevail; that great wealth can provide both the resources and the motivation to exert potent political influence. Data on the US distributions of income and wealth are used to construct several Material Power Indices, which suggest that the wealthiest Americans may exert vastly greater political influence than average citizens and that a very small group of the wealthiest (perhaps the top tenth of 1 percent) may have sufficient power to dominate policy in certain key areas. A brief review of the literature suggests possible mechanisms by which such influence could occur, through lobbying, the electoral process, opinion shaping, and the US Constitution itself.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.