Skip to main content

The Art of Political Science: Spatial Diagrams as Iconic and Revelatory

  • Henry E. Brady (a1)

Spatial diagrams of politics could and should be iconic for political science in much the same way as supply-and-demand curves are in economics. Many fundamental problems of political science can be connected with them, and many different concepts—such as ideological constraint, cross-pressures, framing, agenda-setting, political competition, voting systems, and party systems, to name just a few—can be illuminated through spatial diagrams. Spatial diagrams raise questions and provide insights. They suggest political maneuvers, possible realignments, and political problems. They provide us with revealing images that aid memory and facilitate analysis. They are a powerful way to think about politics, and we could not do better than to feature them in our textbooks, to use them in our research, and to exhibit them as our brand—as our distinctive way of thinking about how the world works

Hide All
Adams, Charles Francis, Haynes, Henry W., Pierce, Edward L., and Hill, Clement Hugh. 1896. “Memoir of Rufus Choate.” Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society (second series) 11: 103105.
Alker, Hayward R. Jr. 1964. “Dimensions of Conflict in the General Assembly.” American Political Science Review 58(3): 642657.
American National Election Studies ( TIME SERIES CUMULATIVE DATA FILE [dataset]. Stanford University and the University of Michigan [producers and distributors], 2010.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rodden, Jonathan, and Snyder, James. 2006. “Purple America.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(2): 97118.
Balkenius, Christian. 1999. “Are There Dimensions in the Brain?” Unpublished manuscript, last modified September 14, 1999. Adobe Acrobat file.
Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bartels, Larry M. 2006. “What's the Matter with What's the Matter with Kansas?Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(2): 201226.
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Beyle, Herman C. 1931. Identification and Analysis of Attribute-Cluster Blocs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Black, Duncan. 1948. “On the Rationale of Group Decision-making.” Journal of Political Economy 56(1): 2334.
Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brady, Henry E. 1990. “Dimensional Analysis of Ranking Data.” American Journal of Political Science 34(4): 10171048.
Brady, Henry E. 1991. “Traits versus Issues: Factor versus Ideal Point Analysis of Candidate Thermometer Ratings.” Political Analysis 2(1): 97129.
Brady, Henry E. 2001. “Trust the People: Political Party Coalitions and the 2000 Election.” In The Unfinished Election of 2000, ed. Rakove, Jack N.. New York: Basic Books.
Brady, Henry E. 2004. “Introduction: Two Paths to a Science of Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 2(2): 295300.
Brady, Henry E.. Stephen Ansolabehere. 1989. “The Nature of Utility Functions in Mass Publics.” The American Political Science Review 83(1): 143163.
Brady, Henry E.. Stephen Ansolabehere., Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and Collier, David. 2009. “Overview of Political Methodology: Post-Behavioral Movements and Trends.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, ed. Goodin, Robert E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brady, Henry E.. Stephen Ansolabehere., Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and Johnston, David Collier. and Richard. 1987. “What's the Primary Message: Horse Race or Issue Journalism?” In Media and Momentum, eds. Orren, Gary and Polsby, Nelson. New York: Chatham House Publishers.
Brady, Henry E.. Stephen Ansolabehere., Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and Kaplan, David Collier. and Richard Johnston. and Cynthia S.. 2009. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Ethnic Identity.” In Measuring Identity, eds. Abdelal, Rawi, Herrera, Yoshiko M., Johnston, Alastair Iain, and McDermott, Rose. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brady, Henry E.. Stephen Ansolabehere., Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and Sniderman, David Collier. and Richard Johnston. and Cynthia S. Kaplan. and Paul M.. 1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” American Political Science Review 79(4): 10611078.
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1971. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1975. “American Politics in the 1970's: Beyond Party?” In The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development, eds. Chambers, William N. and Burnham, Walter Dean. 2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, Angus. 1964. “Voters and Elections: Past and Present.” Journal of Politics 25: 745757.
Campbell, Angus. 1966. “A Classification of the Presidential Elections.” In Elections and the Political Order, eds. Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. New York: John Wiley.
Chambers, William N., and Burnham, Walter Dean, eds. 1967. The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review 98(2): 355370.
Converse, Philip E. 1966. “The Problem of Party Distances in Models of Voting Change.” In The Electoral Process, eds. Jennings, M. Kent and Zeigler, L. Harmon. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Robert. 1955. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Darwin, Charles R. 1846. Geological Observations on South America. Being the Third Part of the Geology of the Voyage of the Beagle, under the Command of Capt. FitzRoy, R.N. during the Years 1832 to 1836. London: Smith Elder and Company.
Davis, Otto A., Hinich, Melvin J., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1970. “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.” American Political Science Review 64(2): 426448.
Downs, Anthony, 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Duverger, Maurice. 1959. Political Parties. 2nd English ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Gärdenfors, Peter. 2000. Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Geanakoplos, John. 1992. “Common Knowledge.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(4): 5382.
Gerring, John. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gerring, John. 1999. “Culture versus Economics: An American Dilemma.” Social Science History 23(2): 129172.
Glimcher, Paul W., Dorris, Michael C., and Bayer, Hannah M.. 2005. “Psychological Utility Theory and the Neuroeconomics of Choice.” Games and Economic Behavior 52: 213256.
Goodin, Robert E. 1975. “Cross-Cutting Cleavages and Social Conflict.” British Journal of Political Science 5(4): 516519.
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 1982 (1787–1788). The Federalist. Reprinted with an introduction by Garry Wills as The Federalist Papers. New York: Bantam.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1904 (1651). Leviathan. Reprinted with notes and ed. by Waller, A.N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, Richard, Blais, André, Brady, Henry E., and Crête, Jean. 1992. Letting the People Decide. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Kaplan, Cynthia S., and Brady, Henry E., 1996, “Estonian Events Data File,” Unpublished Data Set, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Key, V.O. Jr. 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17(1): 318.
Key, V.O. Jr. 1959. “Secular Realignment and the Party System.” Journal of Politics 21(2): 198210.
Laponce, J. A. 1981. Left and Right: The Topography of Political Perceptions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Lijphart, . 1995. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53(1): 164.
Lipset, Seymour Martin., and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, eds. Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein. New York: Free Press.
Locke, John. 1955 (1689). Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent, and End of Civil Government. Reprinted as Of Civil Government: Second Treatise. Chicago: Gateway Editions, dist. Henry Regnery Company.
MacRae, Duncan Jr. 1965. “A Method for Identifying Issues and Factions from Legislative Votes.” American Political Science Review 59(4): 909926.
MacRae, Duncan Jr. 1970. Issues and Parties in Legislative Voting: Methods of Statistical Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
MacRae, Duncan Jr., and Meldrum, James. 1960. “Critical Elections in Illinois: 1888–1958.” American Political Science Review 54(3): 669683.
Mayhew, David. 2002. Electoral Realignments. New Haven: Yale University Press.
McKelvey, Richard D. 1975. “Policy Related Voting and Electoral Equilibrium.” Econometrica 43(5-6): 815843.
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. “A Rational Model of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89: 914927.
Merkl, Peter H. 1969. “Review: Political Cleavages and Party Systems.” World Politics 21(3): 469485.
Morgan, Robert J., 1981. “Madison's Analysis of the Sources of Political Authority.” American Political Science Review 75(3): 613625.
Morgan, Mary S., and Morrison, Margaret, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neto, Octavio Amorim, and Cox, Gary. 1997. “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 149174.
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Odegard, Peter H. 1935. “Political Parties and Group Pressures.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 179: 6881.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 29(2): 357384.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. “D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26(1): 529.
Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1976. “Political Cleavage Structure, Cross-Pressure Processes, and Partisanship: An Empirical Test of the Theory.” American Journal of Political Science 20(1): 123.
Rice, Stuart A. 1928. Quantitative Methods in Politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Roemer, John, Lee, Woojin, and van der Straeten, Karine. 2007. Racism, Xenophobia, and Distribution: Multi-Issue Politics in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rokkan, Stein. 1968. “The Structuring of Mass Politics in the Smaller European Democracies: A Developmental Typology.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 10: 173210.
Rokkan, Stein. 1977. “Towards a Generalized Concept of Verzuiling: A Preliminary Note.” Political Studies 25: 563570.
Russett, Bruce M. 1966. “Discovering Voting Groups in the United Nations.” American Political Science Review 60(2): 327339.
Rustichini, Aldo. 2009. “Neuroeconomics: What Have We Found, and What Should We Search For?Current Opinion in Neurobiology 19: 672677.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Rinehart & Company.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1952. “Political Parties and the Public Interest.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 280: 1826.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1957. “Intensity, Visibility, Direction and Scope.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 51, No. 4 (Dec., 1957), pp. 933942.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Austin: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Schofield, Norman, and Miller, Gary. 2007. “Elections and Activist Coalitions in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 51(3): 518531.
Schubert, Glendon. 1962. “The 1960 Term of the Supreme Court: A Psychological Analysis.” American Political Science Review 56(1): 90107.
Shafer, Byron E., and Claggett, William J.M.. 1995. The Two Majorities: The Issue Context of Modern American Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Spencer, Arthur W. 1914. “The Balkan Question—The Key to a Permanent Peace.” American Political Science Review 8(4): 563582.
Sundquist, James L. 1973. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Michael, and Rae, Douglas. 1969. “An Analysis of Crosscutting between Political Cleavages.” Comparative Politics 1(4): 534547.
Turner, Julius. 1951. Party and Constituency: Pressures on Congress. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
Tversky, Amos. 1977. “Features of similarity.” Psychological Review 84: 327352.
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Brady, Henry E., and Nie, Norman. 1995.American Citizen Participation Study, 1990 [Computer file]. ICPSR06635-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], doi:10.3886/ICPSR06635
Watson, James D., and Crick, Francis. 1953. “A Structure for Deoxyribonucleic Acid.” Nature 171: 737738.
Wilson, James Q. 1990. “Interests and Deliberation in the American Republic, or, Why James Madison Would Never Have Received the James Madison Award.” PS: Political Science and Politics 23(4): 558562.
Zariski, Raphael. 1960. “Party Factions and Comparative Politics: Some Preliminary Observations.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 4(1): 2751.
Zuckerman, Alan. 1975. “Political Cleavage: A Conceptual and Theoretical Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 5(2): 231248.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed