Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The ‘Tribal Politics’ of Field Research: A Reflection on Power and Partiality in 21st-Century Warzones


Can fieldwork still be done in today’s most violent warzones? We contend that long-held methodological principles about power and impartiality do not hold in today’s conflict-ridden environments. Research of this kind can still be pursued, but only if the scholar’s place is reconceived as one of limited power and unavoidable partiality. We argue that those still able to do fieldwork in sites of increasing danger do so by virtue of building their own ‘tribes,’ forming and joining different social micro-systems to collect data and, in some cases, survive. Field research must, therefore, be recognized as its own form of foreign intervention. In considering the future of political science research in the most challenging war-torn settings, we examine the risks and opportunities that accompany ‘tribal politics’ of this kind and underline the importance of reflecting on our own positionality in the process of knowledge production.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The ‘Tribal Politics’ of Field Research: A Reflection on Power and Partiality in 21st-Century Warzones
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The ‘Tribal Politics’ of Field Research: A Reflection on Power and Partiality in 21st-Century Warzones
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The ‘Tribal Politics’ of Field Research: A Reflection on Power and Partiality in 21st-Century Warzones
      Available formats
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Francis Kofi Abiew . 2012. “Humanitarian Action under Fire: Reflections on the Role of NGOs in Conflict and Post-Conflict Situations.” International Peacekeeping 19(2): 203–16.

Jaqueline Adams . 1998. “The Wrongs of Reciprocity: Fieldwork among Chilean Working-Class Women.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 27(2): 219–41.

Ariel Ahram . 2013. “Iraq in the Social Sciences: Testing the Limits of Research.” Journal of the Middle East and Africa 4: 251–66.

Séverine Autesserre . 2014. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kate Baldwin . 2016. “The Paradox of Chiefs.” In The Paradox of Traditional Chiefs in Democratic Africa, 319. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sultan Barakat and Sue Ellis . 1996. “Researching under Fire: Issues for Consideration When Collecting Data and Information in War Circumstances, with Specific Reference to Relief and Reconstruction Projects.” Disasters 20(2): 149–56.

Molly Bingham and Steve Connors . 2013. “Reporting the Story: Thoughts for Reporting on Violent Groups in a Turbulent Environment.” In Research Methods in Conflict Settings: A View from Below, edited by Dyan Mazurana , Karen Jacobsen , and Lacey Gale , 169220. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Philippe Bourgois . 1990. “Confronting Anthropological Ethics: Ethnographic Lessons from Central America.” Journal of Peace Research 27(1): 4354.

Charli Carpenter . 2012. “‘You Talk of Terrible Things So Matter-of-Factly in This Language of Science’: Constructing Human Rights in the Academy.” Perspectives on Politics 10(2): 363–83.

Joan Cassell . 1980. “Ethical Principles for Conducting Fieldwork.” American Anthropologist 82(1): 2841.

Anuradha Chakravarty . 2012. “‘Partially Trusting’ Field Relationships Opportunities and Constraints of Fieldwork in Rwanda’s Postconflict Setting.” Field Methods 24(3): 251–71.

David Chandler . 2006. “Back to the Future? The Limits of Neo-Wilsonian Ideals of Exporting Democracy.” Review of International Studies 32: 475–94.

Kamari M Clarke . 2010. “Toward a Critically Engaged Ethnographic Practice.” Current Anthropology 51(S2): S301–S12.

Jeffrey H Cohen . 2000. “Problems in the Field: Participant Observation and the Assumption of Neutrality.” Field Methods 12(4): 316–33.

Nissim Cohen and Tamar Arieli . 2011. “Field Research in Conflict Environments: Methodological Challenges and Snowball Sampling.” Journal of Peace Research 48(4): 423–35.

Daniel Corstange . 2016. “Anti-American Behavior in the Middle East: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Lebanon.” Journal of Politics 78(1): 311–25.

Arnaud Dandoy and Marc-Antoine Pérouse de Montclos . 2013. “Humanitarian Workers in Peril? Deconstructing the Myth of the New and Growing Threat to Humanitarian Workers.” Global Crime 14(4): 341–58.

Alexander De Juan and André Bank . 2015. “The Ba‘athist Blackout? Selective Goods Provision and Political Violence in the Syrian Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research 52(1): 91104.

Alex de Waal . 2009. “Mission without End? Peacekeeping in the African Political Marketplace.” International Affairs 85(1): 99113.

Caroline M Dillman . 1977. “Ethical Problems in Social Science Research Peculiar to Participant Observation.” Human Organization 36(4): 405–07.

Tessa Diphoorn . 2012. “The Emotionality of Participation: Various Modes of Participation in Ethnographic Fieldwork on Private Policing in Durban, South Africa.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 42(2): 201–25.

Jesse Driscoll . 2015. Warlords and Coalition Politics in Post-Soviet States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kim V. L England . 1994. “Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research.” The Professional Geographer 46(1): 8089.

Pierre Englebert and Denis M. Tull . 2008. “Postconflict Reconstruction in Africa: Flawed Ideas about Failed States.” International Security 32(4): 106–39.

Gary Alan Fine . 1993. “Ten Lies of Ethnography: Moral Dilemmas of Field Research.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22(3): 267–94.

Lee Ann Fujii . 2010. “Shades of Truth and Lies: Interpreting Testimonies of War and Violence.” Journal of Peace Research 47(2): 231–41.

Fawaz A Gerges . 2009. The Far Enemy: Why Jihad Went Global. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Alice Goffman . 2014. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

J. Paul Goode . 2010. “Redefining Russia: Hybrid Regimes, Fieldwork, and Russian Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 8(4): 1055–75.

Gemma Van Der Haar , Annelies Heijmans , and Dorothea Hilhorst . 2013. “Interactive Research and the Construction of Knowledge in Conflict-Affected Settings.” Disasters 37(1): 2035.

Maureen Hays-Mitchell . 2001. “Danger, Fulfillment, and Responsibility in a Violence-Plagued Society.” Geographical Review 91(1–2): 311–21.

Tobias Hecht . 1998. At Home in the Street: Street Children of Northeast Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Geraint Hughes and Christian Tripodi . 2009. “Anatomy of a Surrogate: Historical Precedents and Implications for Contemporary Counter-Insurgency and Counter-Terrorism.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 20(1): 135.

Jeffrey C Isaac . 2015. “For a More Public Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 13(2): 269–83.

Ian Charles Jarvie . 1969. “The Problem of Ethical Integrity in Participant Observation.” Current Anthropology 10(5): 505–08.

Carole Gaar Johnson . 1982. “Risks in the Publication of Fieldwork.” In The Ethics of Social Research: Fieldwork, Regulation, and Publication, edited by Joan Sieber , 71–91. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Mary Kaldor . 2013. “In Defence of New Wars.” Stability: International Journal of Security and Development 2(1), 4: 116.

David Kilcullen . 2005. “Countering Global Insurgency.” Journal of Strategic Studies 28(4): 597617.

J. Christopher Kovats-Bernat . 2002. “Negotiating Dangerous Fields: Pragmatic Strategies for Fieldwork Mid Violence and Terror.” American Anthropologist 104(1): 208–22.

Austin Long . 2008. “The Anbar Awakening.” Survival 50(2): 6794.

Romain Malejacq . 2016. “Warlords, Intervention, and State Consolidation: A Typology of Political Orders in Weak and Failed States.” Security Studies 25(1): 85110.

Mahmood Mamdani . 2010. “Responsibility to Protect or Right to Punish?” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 4(1): 5367.

Dyan Mazurana and Lacey Andrews Gale . 2013. “Preparing for Research in Active Conflict Zones.” In Research Methods in Conflict Settings: A View from Below, edited by Dyan Mazurana , Karen Jacobsen , and Lacey Gale , 277–92. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dyan Mazurana , Karen Jacobsen , and Lacey Gale , ed. 2013. Research Methods in Conflict Settings: A View from Below. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Michael McCann . 2016. “Labor Scholarship And/as Labor Activism.” Perspectives on Politics 14(2): 432–41.

Sarah Moser . 2008. “Personality: A New Positionality?” Area 40(3) (September): 383–92.

Michael W Mosser . 2010. “Puzzles versus Problems: The Alleged Disconnect between Academics and Military Practitioners.” Perspectives on Politics 8(4): 1077–86.

Dipali Mukhopadhyay . 2014. Warlords, Strongman Governors, and the State in Afghanistan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marina Ottaway . 2003. “Promoting Democracy after Conflict: The Difficult Choices.” International Studies Perspectives 4(3): 314–22.

Roland Paris . 2004. At War’s End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.

N. Patrick Peritore . 1990. “Reflections on Dangerous Fieldwork.” The American Sociologist 21(4): 359–72.

Roger D Petersen . 2011. Western Intervention in the Balkans: The Strategic Use of Emotions in Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Michael Price , Robert A. Rubinstein , and David H. Price . 2012. “‘Material Support’: US Anti-Terrorism Law Threatens Human Rights and Academic Freedom.” Anthropology Today 28(1): 35.

Oliver P Richmond . 2006. “The Problem of Peace: Understanding the ‘Liberal Peace.’” Conflict, Security & Development 6(3): 291314.

Philip Carl Salzman . 2002. “On Reflexivity.” American Anthropologist 104(3): 805–13.

Jacob Shapiro and Nils B. Weidmann . 2015. “Is the Phone Mightier than the Sword? Cell Phones and Insurgent Violence in Iraq.” International Organization 69(2): 247–74.

Astri Suhrke . 2007. “Reconstruction as Modernisation: The ‘post-Conflict’ Project in Afghanistan.” Third World Quarterly 28(7): 12911308.

Charles Tilly . 2005. Trust and Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

David Trigger , Martin Forsey , and Carla Meurk . 2012. “Revelatory Moments in Fieldwork.” Qualitative Research 12(5): 513–27.

Murray L Wax . 1977. “On Fieldworkers and Those Exposed to Fieldwork: Federal Regulations and Moral Issues.” Human Organization (36): 321–28.

Lisa Wedeen . 2010. “Refletions on Ethnographic Work in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 13(1): 255–72.

Elisabeth Jean Wood . 2006. “The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones.” Qualitative Sociology 29(3): 373–86.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 31
Total number of PDF views: 388 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1541 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th December 2016 - 17th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.