Skip to main content

Does the US Media Have a Liberal Bias?: A Discussion of Tim Groseclose's Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind

  • Brendan Nyhan (a1)

In Left Turn: How Liberal Bias Distorts The American Mind, Tim Groseclose argues that media effects play a crucial role in American politics. His case rests on three arguments: (1) that journalists tend overwhelmingly to be liberal rather than conservative; (2) that their innate political bias slants their views in empirically measurable ways; and (3) that this bias fundamentally shapes American politics, by bringing US citizens further to the left than they would naturally be. According to Groseclose, in a world where media bias did not exist, American citizens would on average hold views close to those of Ben Stein or Bill O'Reilly. In such a world, John McCain would have defeated Barack Obama by a popular vote margin of 56%—42% in the 2008 presidential election.

In making these claims, Groseclose draws on his own research, and on recent media scholarship by both political scientists and economists, making the broader claim that peer-reviewed social science—which seeks to deal with problems such as endogeneity and selection bias—should be the starting point for public arguments about the role of the media. His book, then, is clearly an effort to bring social scientific arguments into mainstream debates. Groseclose makes no secret of his conservative political leanings—but recent books from left-leaning political scientists such as Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson are equally unapologetic. It is at least plausible that political scientists' typical unwillingness to engage directly in political arguments has weakened the discipline's capacity for public engagement.

In this symposium a diverse group of contributors have been invited to engage with Groseclose's arguments in ways that bring together specific empirical and/or theoretical points and arguments aimed at the broader “political science public sphere” that Perspectives on Politics seeks to nurture. Contributors were asked to consider these five questions: (1): How do we best measure media effects? (2): If media bias exists, what are its plausible sources? (3): Can one use work on media effects to determine what people's views would be in the absence of such bias? (4): Do you agree that American politics is insufficiently representative, and if so what do you consider the primary sources of this problem? (5): What kinds of political and/or media institutions or practices might enhance democratic discourse?—Henry Farrell, Associate Editor

Hide All
Colbert Stephen. 2006. White House Correspondents' Association Dinner. April 29.
Cook Timothy E. 2005. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
D'Alessio Dave, and Allen Mike. 2000. “Media Bias in Presidential Elections: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Communication 50(4): 133–56.
Dow Jones & Co. 2005. “Dow Jones responds to UCLA media bias ‘study.’” Poynter Forums. December 21., accessed December 22, 2005.
Gasper John. 2011. “Shifting Ideologies? Re-examining Media Bias.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6: 85102.
Gentzkow Matthew, and Shapiro Jesse. 2010. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers.” Econometrica 78(1): 3571.
Greenberg David. 1998. “Right Thinking: An Authorized History of a Foundation That Has Set the Conservative Agenda for 25 Years.” New York Times, May 10.
Groseclose Tim, and Milyo Jeffrey. 2005. “A Measure of Media Bias.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(4): 1191–237.
Hamilton James. 2004. All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Judis John. 2001. The Paradox of American Democracy: Elites, Special Interests, and the Betrayal of the Public Trust. New York: Pantheon Books.
Lichter S. Robert, Rothman Stanley, and Lichter Linda S.. 1986. The Media Elite. Bethesda, MD: Adler and Adler.
Lott John R. Jr., and Hassett Kevin A.. 2004. “Is Newspaper Coverage of Economic Events Politically Biased?” Unpublished manuscript.
Povich Elaine. 1996. Partners and Adversaries: The Contentious Connection Between Congress and the Media. Arlington: Freedom Forum.
Waldman Paul. 2005. “Former fellows at conservative think tanks issued flawed UCLA-led study on media's ‘liberal bias.’” Media Matters for America, December 21,, accessed December 21, 2005.
Washington Examiner. 2007. “Edwin Feulner: The Heritage Foundation's president revolutionized the Washington think tank scene.” October 1., accessed December 22, 2011.
Weaver David Hugh, and Wilhoit G. Cleveland. 1996. The American Journalist in the 1990s: U.S. News People at the End of an Era. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 28
Total number of PDF views: 196 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2409 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.