Skip to main content Accessibility help

Freedom of the Press and Public Responsiveness

  • Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice, Stuart Soroka and Christopher Wlezien


Public responsiveness to policy is contingent on there being a sufficient amount of clear and accurate information about policy available to citizens. It is of some significance then, that there are increasing concerns about limits being placed on media outlets around the world. We examine the impact of these limits on the public’s ability to respond meaningfully to policy by analyzing cross-national variation in the opinion–policy link. Using new measures on spending preferences from Wave 4 of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, merged with OECD data on government spending and Freedom House measures of press freedom, we assess the role of mass media in facilitating public responsiveness. We find evidence that when media are weak, so too is public responsiveness to policy. These results highlight the critical role that accurate, unfettered media can play in modern representative democracy.



Hide All

Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at:



Hide All
Altheide, David L. 1997. “The News Media, the Problem Frame, and the Production of Fear.” Sociological Quarterly 38: 647–68.
Barabas, Jason and Jerit, Jennifer. 2009. “Estimating the Causal Effects of Media Coverage on Policy‐Specific Knowledge.” American Journal of Political Science 53(1): 7389.
Bakshy, Eytan, Messing, Solomon, and Adamic, Lada A.. 2015. “Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science 348(6239): 1130–32.
Béland, Daniel and Schlager, Edella. 2019. “Varieties of Policy Feedback Research: Looking Backward, Moving Forward.” Policy Studies Journal 47(2): 184205.
Bennett, W. Lance, Lawrence, Regina G., and Livingston, Steven. 2008. When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Besley, Timothy and Prat, Andrea. 2006. “Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability.” American Economic Review 96(3): 720–36.
Boydstun, Amber E. 2013. Making the News: Politics, the Media, and Agenda Setting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brooks, Clem and Manza, Jeffrey. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: Public Opinion and the Future of Social Provision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burstein, Paul. 2013. American Public Opinion, Advocacy, and Policy in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, A. Colin, Gelbach, Jonah B., and Miller, Douglas L.. 2011. “Robust Inference with Multiway Clustering.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 29(2): 238–49.
Cook, Fay Lomax and Barrett, Edith J.. 1992. Support for the American Welfare State: The Views of Congress and the Public. New York: Columbia University Press.
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Knutsen, Carl Henrik, Lindberg, Staffan I., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Teorell, Jan, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Steven Fish, M., Cornell, Agnes, Dahlum, Sirianne, Gjerløw, Haakon, Glynn, Adam, Hicken, Allen, Krusell, Joshua, Lührmann, Anna, Marquardt, Kyle L., McMann, Kelly, Mechkova, Valeriya, Medzihorsky, Juraj, Olin, Moa, Paxton, Pamela, Pemstein, Daniel, Pernes, Josefine, von Römer, Johannes, Seim, Brigitte, Sigman, Rachel, Staton, Jeffrey, Stepanova, Natalia, Sundström, Aksel, Tzelgov, Eitan, Wang, Yi-ting, Wig, Tore, Wilson, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v8. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem), Gothenburg, Sweden: V-Dem Institute Project.
Coyne, Christopher J. and Leeson, Peter T.. 2004. “Read All About It! Understanding the Role of Media in Economic Development.” Kyklos 57(1): 2144.
Dalen, Arjen van, de Vreese, Claes, and Albæk, Erik. 2015. “Economic News through the Magnifying Glass.” Journalism Studies 18(7): 890909.
Carpini, Delli, Michael, X., Scott, Keeter and Webb, Sharon. 1997. “The Impact of Presidential Debates.” In Politics and the Press: The News Media and their Influences, ed. Norris, Pippa, pp. 145–64. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner.
Durr, Robert H. 1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?American Political Science Review 87(1): 158–70.
Eichenberg, Richard C. and Stoll., Richard 2003. “Representing Defense: Democratic Control of the Defense Budget in the United States and Western Europe.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47(4): 399422.
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flaxman, Seth, Goel, Sharad, and Rao, Justin M.. 2016. “Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1): 298320.
Fraile, Marta. 2013. “Do Information-Rich Contexts Reduce Knowledge Inequalities? The Contextual Determinants of Political Knowledge in Europe.” Acta Politica 48(2): 119–43.
Friedman, Sharon H., Dunwoody, Sharon, and Rogers, Carol L., eds. 1999. Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science. New York: Routledge.
Garrett, R. Kelly. 2009. “Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate.” Journal of Communication 59(4): 676– 99.
Goggin, Malcolm and Wlezien, Christopher. 1993. “Abortion Opinion and Policy in the American States.” In Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, ed. Goggin, Malcolm, pp. 190202. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Groeling, Tim. 2013. “Media Bias by the Numbers: Challenges and Opportunities in the Empirical Study of Partisan News.” Annual Review of Political Science 16(1): 129–51.
Hasenfeld, Yeheskel and Rafferty, Jane A.. 1989. “The Determinants of Public Attitudes toward the Welfare State.” Social Forces 67(4): 1027–48.
Iyengar, Shanto and Hahn, Kyu S.. 2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication 59(1): 1939.
Iyengar, Shanto and Kinder, Donald R.. 2010. News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jennings, Will. 2009. “The Public Thermostat, Political Responsiveness and Error-Correction: Border Control and Asylum in Britain, 1994–2007.” British Journal of Political Science 39(4): 847– 70.
Jennings, Will and John, Peter. 2009. “The Dynamics of Political Attention: Public Opinion and the Queen’s Speech in the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 838–54.
Lawrence, Regina G. 2000. “Game-Framing the Issues: Tracking the Strategy Frame in Public Policy News.” Political Communication 17(2): 93114.
Leeson, Peter T. and Coyne, Christopher J.. 2007. “The Reformers’ Dilemma: Media, Policy Ownership, and Reform.” European Journal of Law and Economics 23(3): 237–50.
McQuail, Denis. 1997. “Accountability of Media to Society: Principles and Means.” European Journal of Communication 12(4): 511–29.
Messing, Solomon and Westwood, Sean J.. 2014. “Selective Exposure in the Age of Social Media: Endorsements Trump Partisan Source Affiliation When Selecting News Online.” Communication Research 41(8): 1042–63.
Meyrowitz, Joshua. 1994. “Visible and Invisible Candidates: A Case Study in ‘Competing Logics’ of Campaign Coverage.” Political Communication 11(2): 145–64.
Mulgan, Richard. 2003. Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies. New York: Springer.
Neuner, Fabian. G., Soroka, Stuart N., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2019. “Mass Media as a Source of Public Responsiveness.” International Journal of Press/Politics 24(3): 269–92.
Norris, Pippa. 2006. “The Role of the Free Press in Promoting Democratization, Good Governance and Human Development.” Matters 45(4–6): 66.
Pacheco, Julianna. 2013. “The Thermostatic Model of Responsiveness in the American States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 13(3): 306– 32.
Page, Benjamin and Shapiro, Robert. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Patterson, Thomas E. 1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage Books.
Shoemaker, Pamela J. and Vos., Tim P. 2009. Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.
Soroka, Stuart N. 2012. “The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World.” Journal of Politics 74(2): 514–28.
Soroka, Stuart N. and Wlezien., Christopher 2004. “Opinion Representation and Policy Feedback: Canada in Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 37(3): 531–59.
Soroka, Stuart N. and Wlezien., Christopher 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stimson, James A. 1999. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings, 2nd ed. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
Stimson, James A., Mackuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–65.
Stocking, S. Holly and Holstein, Lisa W.. 2008. “Manufacturing Doubt: Journalists’ Roles and the Construction of Ignorance in a Scientific Controversy.” Public Understanding of Science 18(1): 2342.
Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2008. “Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure.” Political Behavior 30(3): 341–66.
Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2010. “Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Communication 60(3): 556–76.
Williams, Christopher J. and Schoonvelde., Martijn 2018. “It Takes Three: How Mass Media Coverage Conditions Public Responsiveness to Policy Outputs in the United States.” Social Science Quarterly 99(5): 1627–36.
Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39(4): 9811000.
Wlezien, Christopher. 2004. “Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy.” Journal of Politics 66: 124.
Wlezien, Christopher. 2017. “Public Opinion and Policy Representation: On Conceptualization, Measurement, and Interpretation.” Policy Studies Journal 45(4): 561– 82.
Wlezien, Christopher and Soroka, Stuart N.. 2011. ”Federalism and Public Responsiveness to Policy.” Publius 41(1):3152.
Wlezien, Christopher and Soroka, Stuart N.. 2012. “Political Institutions and the Opinion–Policy Link.” West European Politics 35(6): 1407–32.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Hiaeshutter-Rice et al. Dataset

Supplementary materials

Hiaeshutter-Rice et al. supplementary material
Hiaeshutter-Rice et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (246 KB)
246 KB
Supplementary materials

Hiaeshutter-Rice et al. supplementary material
Hiaeshutter-Rice et al. supplementary material 2

 Word (82 KB)
82 KB

Freedom of the Press and Public Responsiveness

  • Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice, Stuart Soroka and Christopher Wlezien


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed