Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Political Science and the Public Sphere Today

  • Rogers M. Smith
Abstract

The potential of political science to contribute to debates over public issues has long been hindered by tensions in the discipline's goals of achieving scientific rigor while also serving America's democracy. Those tensions have been exacerbated by recent trends in American higher education working to separate research and teaching activities and to rely more on external donors to finance both. Collectively these trends suggest that political science faces growing pressures to steer away from unpopular topics in both research and teaching, and to abandon the traditional teacher/scholar model of academic careers. It is advisable for the discipline both to seek more actively to promote engagement between different forms of political science scholarship in order to achieve cumulative knowledge that is pertinent to important political issues, and to preserve and strengthen its commitments to effective teaching about politics.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Arum, Richard, and Roksum, Josipa. 2011. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Associated Press. 2015. “Obama Proposes Publicly Funded Community Colleges for All.” January 9. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2015/01/09/us/politics/ap-us-obama.html.
Basken, Paul. 2013. “Senate Moves to Limit NSF Spending on Political Science.” Chronicle of Higher Education, March 21. http://chronicle.com/article/Senate-Moves-to-Limit-NSF/138027/.
Beard, Charles A. 1993. “Politics.” In Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States, eds. Farr, James and Seidelman, Raymond. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bender, Thomas, and Schorske, Carl E., eds. 1997. American Academic Culture in Transformation: Fifty Years, Four Disciplines. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Berrett, Dan. 2011. “Want to Be a Good Researcher? Try Teaching.” Chronicle of Higher Education, August 18.
Bok, Derek. 2007. Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bond, Jon R. 2007. “The Scientification of the Study of Politics: Some Observations on the Behavioral Evolution in Political Science.” Journal of Politics 69: 95.
Carey, Kevin. 2010. “That Old College Lie.” Democracy 15, Winter, w.democracyjournal.org/15/6722.php?page=all.
Flaherty, Colleen. 2015. “Going After the Donors.” Inside Higher Ed, January 30. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/01/30/steven-salaitas-long-anticipated-lawsuit-against-u-illinois-includes-twist.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Geiger, Roger L. 2004. Knowledge and Money: Research Universities and the Paradox of the Marketplace. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
George, Robert P. 1995. Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ginsberg, Benjamin. 2011. The Fall of the Faculty: The Rise of the All-Administrative University and Why It Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
Glenn, David. 2009. “Senator Proposes an End to Federal Support for Political Science.” Chronicle of Higher Education, October 7.
Green, Donald P., and Gerber, Alan S. 2008. Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Your Voter Turnout. 2d ed.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Hacker, Andrew, and Dreifus, Claudia. 2010. Higher Education? How Colleges Are Wasting Our Money and Failing Our Kids—and What We Can Do about It. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Skocpol, Theda. 2006. “Restoring the Tradition of Rigor and Relevance to Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics at http://www.apsanet.org/Files/Task%20Force%20Reports/PSJan06JacobSkocpol.pdf.
Kaase, Max. 2011. “Should Political Science Be More Relevant? A Comment on the Paper by John E. Trent.” European Political Science 10: 228231.
Kirkpatrick, David D. 2009. “The Conservative-Christian Big Thinker.” New York Times, December 20, MM24.
Laitin, David D. 2005. “The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science.” Politics & Society 31: 179.
Lupia, Arthur, and Aldrich, John H. 2014. “Improving Public Perceptions of Political Science’s Value.” Report of the Task Force on Improving Public Perceptions of Political Science’s Value. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Monroe, , , Kristen Renwick, ed. 2005. Perestroika: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Nielsen, , Kleis, Rasmus. 2012. Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Putnam, Robert D. 2003. “The Public Role of Political Science.” Presidential Address. Perspectives on Politics 1(2): 249255.
Putnam, Robert D. 2003. Better Together: Restoring the American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Scott, , Vecchiarelli, Joanna, and Smith, Rogers M. 2010. “Teaching: The Issues Perestroika Neglected.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43(4): 751.
Shear, Michael D. 2014. “Colleges Rattled as Obama Seeks Rating System.” New York Times, May 25, A1.
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. “Still Blowing in the Wind: The American Quest for a Democratic, Scientific Political Science.” In American Academic Culture in Transformation: Fifty Years, Four Disciplines, eds. Bender, Thomas, and Schorske, Carl E.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Smith, Rogers M. 2002a. “Putting the Substance Back in Political Science.” Chronicle of Higher Education, April 5, sec. 2: Chronicle Review 47: B10–11.
Smith, Rogers M 2002b. “Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics?” PS: Political Science and Politics 35(2): 199201.
Smith, Rogers M. 2005. “Of Means and Meaning: The Challenges of Doing Good Political Science.” In. Perestroika: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science, ed. Renwick Monroe, Kristen. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Smith, Rogers M. 2014. “Ideas and the Spiral of Politics: The Place of American Political Thought in American Political Development.” American Political Thought 3(1): 126136.
Smith, Rogers M. 2015. Political Peoplehood. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Soss, Joe, Meghan, Condon, Matthew, Holleque, Amber, Wichowsky. 2006. “The Illusion of Technique: How Method-Driven Research Leads Welfare Scholarship Astray.” Social Science Quarterly 87: 798807.
Stainburn, Samantha. 2010. “The Case of the Vanishing Full-Time Professor.” New York Times, January 3, 2010, ED6
Tarrow, Sidney G. 2008. “Polarization and Convergence in Academic Controversies.” Theory and Society 37: 513–36.
Trent, John E. 2011. “Should Political Science Be More Relevant? An Empirical and Critical Analysis of the Discipline.” European Political Science 10: 191209.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed