Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Politics of International Regime Complexity

  • Karen J. Alter (a1) and Sophie Meunier (a2)


The increasing density of international regimes has contributed to the proliferation of overlap across agreements, conflicts among international obligations, and confusion regarding what international and bilateral obligations cover an issue. This symposium examines the consequences of this “international regime complexity” for subsequent politics. What analytical insights can be gained by thinking about any single agreement as being embedded in a larger web of international rules and regimes? Karen Alter and Sophie Meunier's introductory essay defines international regime complexity and identifies the mechanisms through which it may influence the politics of international cooperation. Short contributions analyze how international regime complexity affects politics in specific issue areas: trade (Christina Davis), linkages between human rights and trade (Emilie Hafner-Burton), intellectual property (Laurence Helfer), security politics (Stephanie Hofmann), refugee politics (Alexander Betts), and election monitoring (Judith Kelley). Daniel Drezner concludes by arguing that international regime complexity may well benefit the powerful more than others.



Hide All
Abbott, Kenneth, and Snidal, Duncan. 1998. Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1): 332.
Abbott, Kenneth, and Snidal, Duncan. 2003. Pathways to international cooperation. In The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation, ed. Benvenisti, E. and Hirsch, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aggarwal, Vinod K. 1998. Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages and Nesting. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Aggarwal, Vinod, and Fogarty, Edward. 2005. The limits of interregionalism: The EU and North America. Journal of European Integration 27 (3): 20.
Aggarwal, Vinod K., and Morrison, Charles E., eds. 2001. Asia-Pacific Crossroads: Regime Creation and the Future of APEC.
Aggarwal, Vinod K., and Spiegel, Mark M.. 1997. Debt games: Strategic interaction in international debt rescheduling. Journal of Economic Literature 35 (4): 1.
Alison, Graham. 1969. Conceptual models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. American Political Science Review 63 (3): 689718.
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie. 2006. Banana splits: Nested and competing regimes in the Transatlantic Banana Trade Dispute. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (3): 362–82.
Alter, Karen J., and Vargas, Jeannette. 2000. Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies: EC law and UK gender equality policy. Comparative Political Studies 33 (4): 316–46.
Amaral, L.A.N., and Ottino, J.M.. 2004. Complex networks: Augmenting the framework for the study of complex systems. European Physical Journal B 38: 147–62.
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (2): 24.
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert. 1986. Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. In Cooperation Under Anarchy, ed. Oye, K.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 1999. The politics, power and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization 53 (4): 699732.
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World : International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY & London: Cornell University Press.
Bob, Clifford. 2002. Merchants of morality. Foreign Policy March/April: 3645.
Busch, Marc L. 2007. Overlapping institutions, forum shopping, and dispute settlement in international trade. International Organization 61 (4): 735–61.
Carpenter, Charli. 2007. Studying issue (non)-adoption in transnational advocacy networks. International Organization 61 (3): 643–67.
Cogan, Jacob Katz. 2008. Competition and control in international adjudication. Virgina Journal of International Law 48 (2): 411–49.
Cohen, Antonin, and Madsen, Michael Rask. 2007. Cold War law: Legal entrepreneurs and the emergence of a European legal field (1946–1965). In European Ways of Law, ed. Gessner, V. and Nelken, D.. Oxford: Hard.
Davis, Christina. 2007. Forum choice in trade disputes: WTO adjudication, negotiation, and U.S. trade policy. In Annual Meeting of the International Political Economy Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. 2002. Global Prescriptions : The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Diehl, Paul F., Ku, Charlotte, and Zamora, Daniel. 2003. The dynamics of international law: The international of normative and operating systems. International Organization 57: 4375.
Dooley, Kevin J., and Van de Ven, Andrew H.. 1999. Perspective—Explaining complex organizational dynamics. Organization Science : A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences 10 (3): 15.
Evans, Peter B., Jacobson, Harold K., and Putnam, Robert D.. 1993. Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gould, Roger V. 2003. Uses of network tools in comparative historical research. In Comparative Historic Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haas, Ernst. 1964. Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Haas, Ernst. 1990. When Knowledge Is Power: Three Models of change in International Organizations, Studies in International Political Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 136.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2004. “Forum Shopping for Human Rights: The Transformation of Preferential Trade.” Presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC, September 1–4.
Harrington, Brooke, and Fine, Gary. 2000. Opening the “black box”: Small groups and twenty-first century. Social Psychology Quarterly 63 (4): 312–23.
Harrington, Brooke, and Fine, Gary. 2006. Where the action is: Small groups and contemporary sociological theory. Small Group Research 37 (1): 116.
Hawkins, Darren, and Jacoby, Wade. 2006. How agents matter. In Delegation under Anarchy: Principals, Agents and International Organizations, ed. Hawkins, D., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D., and Tierney, M. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, Darren, Neilson, Daniel, Tierney, Michael J., and Lake, David A.. 2006. Delegation under Anarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Helfer, Laurence R. 1999. Forum shopping for human rights. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148: 285399.
Helfer, Laurence R. 2004. Regime shifting: The TRIPS agreement and the new dynamics of international intellectual property making. Yale Journal of International Law 29: 181.
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty; Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jacobs, Alan, and Teles, Steven. 2007. The perils of market-making: The case of British pensions. In Creating Competitive Markets: The Politics of Regulatory Reform, ed. Landy, M. K., Levin, M. A., and Shapiro, M. M.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Janis, Irving Lester. 1972. Victims of Groupthink; A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton.
Jones, Bryan D., Boushey, Graeme, and Workman, Samual. 2006. Behavioral rationality and the policy processes: Toward a new model of organizational information processing. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, ed. Moran, M., Rein, M., and Goodin, R. E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jupille, Joseph, and Snidal, Duncan. 2006. “The Choice of International Institutions: Cooperation, Alternatives and Strategies.” July 7. Available at SSRN:
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Small States in World Markets : Industrial Policy in Europe. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kingsbury, Benedict. 1999. Is the proliferation of international courts and tribunals a systemic problem? New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31: 679–96.
Macy, Michael W., and Willer, Robert. 2002. From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 143–66.
Madsen, Michael Rask. 2007. From Cold War instrument to supreme European court: The European Court of Human Rights at the crossroads of international and national law and politics. Law & Social Inquiry 32 (1): 137–59.
Mansfield, Edward, and Reinhardt, Eric. 2003. Multilateral determinants of regionalism: The effects of GATT/WTO on the formation of preferential trading arrangements. International Organization 57 (4): 829–62.
Morel, Benoit, and Ramanujam, Rangaraj. 1999. Perspective—Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences 10 (3): 16.
Newman, Abraham. 2008. Building transnational civil liberties: Transgovernmental entrepreneurs and the European Data Privacy Directive. International Organization 62 (1): 103–30.
Pedahzur, Ami, and Perliger, Arie. 2006. The changing nature of suicide attacks—A social network perspective. Social Forces 84 (4): 19872008.
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Powers, Kathy, Goertz, Gary, Willerton, John P., and Vashchilko, Tatiana. 2007. “Treaty Nestedness and Complex Security Institutions” July 7, available at SSRN:
Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics; the logic of two level games. International Organization 42 (3): 427–60.
Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David. 2004. The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization 58 (2): 277309.
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2003. International law and social movements: Towards transformation—A typology of relations between social movements and international institutions. American Society of International Legal Proceedings 97 (2003): 301–05.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Snyder, Jack L., and Jervis, Robert. 1993. Coping with Complexity in the International System. Pew Studies in Economics and Security. Boulder: Westview Press.
Uzzi, Brian. 1997a. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (March): 3567.
Uzzi, Brian. 1997b. Towards a network perspective on organizational decline. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 17 (7/8): 111–55.
Walders, Lawrence W., and Pratt, Neil C.. 2003. Trade remedy litigation—Choice of forum and choice of law. Saint Johns Journal of Legal Commentary 18 (fall): 5174.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Watts, Duncan J. 2003. Six Degrees : The Science of a Connected Age. 1st ed.New York: Norton.
Young, Oran. 1996. Institutional linkages in international society: Polar perspectives. Global Governance 2 (1): 124.
Zanini, Michele. 2002. Middle Eastern terrorism and netwar. Peace Research Abstracts 39 (2): 155306.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed