Skip to main content Accessibility help

Puzzles versus Problems: The Alleged Disconnect between Academics and Military Practitioners

  • Michael W. Mosser (a1)

In the halls of both academic and government buildings, the stories of the gap between theory and praxis are legion. Practitioners speak of misguided academics and armchair generals criticizing the creation of strategy and the conduct of operations from the safety of their universities. Moreover, and at a more fundamental level, practitioners are frustrated that academics just don't seem to “get” the policy world. Conversely, academics bemoan the fact that practitioners often fail to fully think through the problems they claim need to be solved. If they had, many scholars argue, they would understand that the “solution” to a “problem” either becomes a part of the problem itself, or creates a whole new set of problems. Whether one calls the gap between theory and praxis in international relations a difference, a disconnect, or a divide hardly matters. What matters is discovering whether or not it actually exists, and if so, what is being done to rectify it. I first describe and then challenge the conventional wisdom that irreconcilable differences separate the academy and military practitioners.

Hide All
Buhaug, Halvard, Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Rød, Jan Ketil. 2008. “Disaggregating Ethno-Nationalist Civil Wars: A Dyadic Test of Exclusion Theory.” International Organization 62(3): 531–51.
Center for Global Studies, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. N.d. “Foreign Language and Area Studies Fellowships.” (, accessed May 10, 2010.
Department of the Army. 2010. “Field Manual 5-0: The Operations Process.” Washington, D.C. (March 26).
Echevarria, Antulio J. 2005. “Fourth Generation War and Other Myths.” (, accessed May 10, 2010.
Gates, Robert. M. 2008. “Speech to the Association of American Universities, as delivered by Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, Washington, DC, Monday, April 14, 2008,” (, accessed May 10, 2010.
Gentile, Lt. Colonel Gian. 2008. “Our COIN Doctrine Removes the Enemy from the Essence of War.” (, accessed 10 May 2010.
Glenn, David. 2007. “Anthropology Association Formally Disapproves of Military Program” Chronicle of Higher Education. (, accessed May 10, 2010.
Kem, Jack. 2008. “CGSC Permanent Professor Program: A Modest Proposal.” (, accessed May 10,2010.
Kipp, Jacob W; Lester Grau, Prinslow, Karl, and Smith, Don. 2006. “The Human Terrain System: A CORDS for the 21st Century.” Military Review 86(5): 815.
Muckian, Martin J. 2006–07. “Structural Vulnerabilities of Network Insurgencies: Adapting to the New Adversary.” Parameters 36(4): 1425.
Nau, Henry. 2008. as cited by J. Ann Tickner and Andrei Tsygankov, “Risks and Opportunities of Crossing the Academy/Policy Divide.” International Studies Review 10(1): 155–77.
Nye, Joseph S. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.
Nye, Joseph S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
Nye, Joseph S. 2008. as cited by J. Ann Tickner and Andrei Tsygankov, “Risks and Opportunities of Crossing the Academy/Policy Divide.” International Studies Review 10(1): 155–77.
Peacock, James, Albro, Robert, Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn, Fosher, Kerry, McNamara, Laura, Heller, Monica, Marcus, George, Price, David, and Goodman, Alan. 2007. “AAA Commission on the Engagement of Anthropology with the US Security and Intelligence Communities Final Report November 4, 2007.” (, accessed May 10, 2010.
Petraeus, David H. 2007. “Beyond the Cloister,” The American Interest (July–August 2007). (, accessed May 10,2010.
Roper, Daniel. 2008. “Global Counterinsurgency: Strategic Clarity for the Long War.” Parameters 38(3): 92108.
Roussel, Violaine. 2008. “Occupational Logics and Political Commitment: American Artists Against the Iraq War.” International Political Sociology 1(4): 373–90.
Social Science Research Council. “The Minerva Controversy.” (, accessed May 10, 2010.
U.S. Department of the Army. 2010. “Field Manual 5-0: The Operations Process.” Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
U.S. Department of Defense. “The Minerva Initiative: Funded Research.” (, accessed May 10, 2010.
U.S. Department of Defense. 2008. “First Minerva Research Initiative Awards Announced.” US Department of Defense news release, December 22. (, accessed May 10, 2010.
U.S. Department of Education. 2008. Office of Postsecondary Education, International Education Programs Service. “Title VI Programs: Building a US International Education Infrastructure.” (, accessed May 10, 2010.
U.S. Military Academy, West Point. “Military Faculty Positions: Frequently Asked Questions.” (, accessed August 11, 2010.
Walt, Stephen. 2005. “The Relationship between Theory and Policy in International Relations.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 2348.
Weinberger, Sharon. 2008. [online piece for Wired magazine] entitled “Pentagon's Minerva Initiative Sparks New Anthro Concerns.” (, accessed May 10, 2010.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed