Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States

  • Kathleen Thelen
Abstract

I use the case of the transportation network company Uber as a lens to explore the comparative politics of the platform economy in Europe and the United States. Within the advanced capitalist world, different countries have responded in very different ways to this new service, from welcome embrace and accommodating regulatory adjustments to complete rejection and legal bans. I analyze Uber’s arrival and reception in the United States, Germany, and Sweden, documenting three very different responses to this disruptive new actor. I show that conflicts over Uber centered on different issues in the three countries. These differences were consequential because the specific regulatory “flashpoints”that Uber provoked mobilized different actors, inspired the formation of different coalitions, and shaped the terms on which conflicts over Uber were framed and fought.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QOOFYS

Above all, she thanks Olivia Bergman for expert research assistance on this project, and Christian Lyhne Ibsen for ongoing input and assistance. Thanks also to Marius Busemeyer, Jens Beckert, and Martin Höpner and colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies for valuable comments on the paper.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Alderman, Liz. 2017. “Uber Is a Taxi Service, the E.C.J. Says, in Major Setback to Firm,” New York Times, December 20, 2017.
Aloisi, Antonio. 2016. “Commoditized Workers: Case Study Research on Labour Law Issues Arising from a Set of ‘On-Demand/Gig Economy’ Platforms.” Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37(3): 653–90.
Armstrong, Benjamin. 2016. “Regulating Uber in U.S. Cities.” Presented at the Radcliffe Workshop on Work and Welfare in the ‘Gig’ Economy, Harvard University, December.
Baccaro, Lucio and Howell, Chris. 2011. “A Common Neoliberal Trajectory.” Politics & Society 39(4): 521–63.
Bennhold, Katrin. 2017. “London’s Uber Ban Raises Questions on Race and Immigration,” New York Times, October 2, 2017.
Berg, Janine. 2016. “Income Security in the On-Demand Economy: Findings and Policy Lessons from a Survey of Crowdworkers,” Comparative Labor Law Policy Journal 37(3): 543–76.
Callaway, Andrew. 2016. “Apploitation in a City of Instaserfs.” Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, January 1.
Chassany, Anne-Sylvaine. 2016. “Uber: A Route Out of the French Banlieues,” Financial Times, March 3.
Collier, Ruth Berins, Dubal, V. B., and Carter, Christopher. 2018. “Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 16(4): [provide final page numbers.]
Dagnino, Emanuele. 2016. “Work in the Sharing Economy. The Position of the EU Commission.” AdaptInternational. June 26.
DeStefano, Valerio. 2016. “The Rise of the ‘Just-in-time Workforce.” Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37(3): 471504.
Ewing, Adam. 2015. Uber Draws Teslas, Therapy out of Taxi Rivals in Sweden,” Bloomberg Technology, January 26, 2015.
Finnveden, Bengt. 1990. “Taxi Deregulation in Sweden.” Ministry of Transport and Communications of Sweden, Stockholm, July 1. Available at http://www.thredbo-conference-series.org/papers/thredbo3/8.%20Finnveden%20pp.115-122.pdf; accessed April 14, 2016.
Friedman, Gerald. 2014. “Workers without Employers: Shadow Corporations and the Rise of the Gig Economy.” Review of Keynesian Economics 2(2): 171–88.
George, Alexander and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gourevitch, Peter. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hacker, Jacob, Pierson, Paul, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2015. “Drift and Conversion.” In Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis, ed. Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, Peter. 2006. “Systematic Process Analysis: When and How to Use It.” European Management Review 3(1): 2431.
Hall, Peter and Soskice, David. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2017. “American Employers as Political Machines.” Journal of Politics 79(1): 105117.
Hirst, Nicholas and Plucinska, Joanna. 2017. “The Uber Opinion: What Does It Mean?” Politico May 11.
Langley, Paul and Leyshon, Andrew. 2017. “Platform Capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation.” Finance and Society 3(1): 1131.
Locke, Richard and Thelen, Kathleen. 1995. “Apples and Oranges Revisited: Contextualized Comparisons and the Study of Comparative Labor Politics.” Politics & Society 23(3): 337–67.
Monopolkommission. 2016. Pressemitteilung [press release]: Monopolkommission untersucht Wettbewerb im Bereich der Sharing Economy und bei digitalen Finanzdienstleistungen. Bonn/Berlin. September 20.
Olsson, Amy Rader. 2016. “Taxi och samåkning: i dag, i morgon och i övermorgon.” Report to the Ministry of Infrastructure. (November). Stockholm. SOU 2016:86.
Prassl, Jeremias and Risak, Martin. 2016. “Uber, Taskrabbit, & Co: Platforms as Employers? Rethinking the Legal Analysis of Crowdwork.” Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37(3): 619–52.
Rahman, K. Sabeel and Thelen, Kathleen. 2018. “Broken Contract: The Rise of the Networked Firm and the Transformation of Twenty-First Century Capitalism,” Unpublished manuscript, MIT.
Rogowski, Ronald and Kayser, Mark Andreas. 2002. “Majoritarian Electoral Systems and Consumer Power: Price-Level Evidence from the OECD Countries. American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 526–39.
Sisson, Patrick. 2017. “Uber and Lyft Return to Austin,” Curbed, June 14.
Spector, Julian. 2016. “Why Transit Agencies Are Finally Embracing Uber.” CityLab, April 11.
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2008. Reforming Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swenson, Peter. 2002. Capitalists against Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trumball, Gunnar. 2012. Strength in Numbers: The Political Power of Weak Interests. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tzur, Amit. 2017. “Uber Über Regulation? Regulatory Change Following the Emergence of New Technologies in the Taxi Market.” Regulation & Governance, published online September 21. Available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/rego.12170.
VDV (Verband Deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen). 2016. “VDV-Stellungnahme zum Dialogpapier ‘Digitale Innovationen’.” Cologne, May 23.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Thelen Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed